We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,131)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (273)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Response: Dem-Sponsored Loophole In Financial Reform Bill Could Hurt Seniors

    July 9, 2010 by Sheryl J. Moore

    PDF for Setting it Straight with The Huffington Post

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE CAN BE FOUND AT: Dem-Sponsored Loophole In Financial Reform Bill Could Hurt Seniors

    Dear Huffington Post Editor and staff,

    I am an independent market research analyst who specializes exclusively in the indexed annuity (IA) and indexed life markets. I have tracked the companies, products, marketing, and sales of these products for over a decade. I used to provide similar services for fixed and variable products, but I believe so strongly in the value proposition of indexed products that I started my own company focusing on IAs exclusively. I do not endorse any company or financial product, and millions look to us for accurate, unbiased information on the insurance market. In fact, we are the firm that regulators look to, and work with, when needing assistance with these products.

    I am contacting you, as the author of an article that was published at The Huffington Post, “Dem-Sponsored Loophole In Financial Reform Bill Could Hurt Seniors.” This article had an alarming number of inaccurate and misleading statements about indexed annuities in it. I am contacting you in response to these inaccuracies, to ensure that you and your readers have accurate, unbiased information on these products in the future.

    First, indexed annuities have not been referred to as “equity indexed annuities” since the late 1990’s. The insurance industry has been careful to enforce a standard of referring to the products as merely “indexed annuities” or “fixed indexed annuities,” so as not to confuse consumers. This industry wants to make a clear distinction between these fixed insurance products and equity investments. It is the safety and guarantees of these products which appeal to consumers, particularly during times of market downturns and volatility. Your help in avoiding any such confusion is so greatly appreciated.

    Second, Senator Harkin’s amendment to the financial reform bill is not “unrelated to the pending financial reform bill.” The pending bill is intended to protect Americans from future financial hardship. Indexed annuities are the only retirement income product that can guarantee Americans an income they cannot outlive, while still providing a minimum guarantee and protecting from loss as a result of market volatility. In light of this, I think you can see why Senator Harkin’s amendment is quite appropriately associated with the pending financial reform bill.

    Third, indexed annuities do not have a “long association with deception and predation.” I would be very interested in having you send me factual evidence of this claim. Coincidentally, I have data which supports the contrary. See data below from the National Association of Insurance Commissioner’s Closed Complaint Database on annuities:

    TOTAL INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS FOR 2006: 187

    TOTAL INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS FOR 2007: 235

    TOTAL INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS FOR 2008: 220

    TOTAL INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS FOR 2009: 148

    Based on our research, this results in average annual complaints as follows:

    AVERAGE INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS PER COMPANY 2006: 4.35

    AVERAGE INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS PER COMPANY 2007: 4.12

    AVERAGE INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS PER COMPANY 2008: 3.86

    AVERAGE INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS PER COMPANY 2009: 3.29

    So, not only have complaints on these indexed annuities declined annually for the past three years, but the average has declined consistently for the past four years. Conversely, variable annuity complaints (which are overseen by the Securities and Exchange Commission) have always been greater than the number of indexed annuity complaints, and have risen in recent years. Certainly, we do strive for 100% customer satisfaction in the insurance market, but I would contend that an average of only 3.29 complaints annually, per company, is quite reasonable and not indicative of “deceptive” sales practices.

    Fourth, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has no regulatory authority over indexed annuities. Investments (products where consumers risk the loss of principal AND gains) such as stocks, bonds, and mutual funds are regulated by the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Indexed annuities are fixed insurance products; similar to fixed annuities and whole life insurance. These fixed insurance products never put the purchaser’s principal or gains at risk due to market volatility. Indexed annuities, like other fixed insurance products, are regulated by the 50 state insurance commissioners of the United States. Together, they form the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC).

    Fifth, indexed annuities do not “act like securities” at all. The only feature that indexed annuities share with securities is the fact that they both receive excess interest based on the performance of a stock index. However, indexed annuities never give the purchaser an option of investing directly in the market; the excess interest on these products is merely based on the performance of the index. A security actually gives the purchaser the option of investing directly in the market. This makes a HUGE difference because indexed annuity purchasers are never at risk of losing money due to market declines when securities purchasers can and DO lose not only gains, but also their principal investment, when the market falls. Another major difference between the two products is that indexed annuities’ excess interest is limited, where securities’ excess interest are not. The monies that back indexed annuities are held in the insurance companies’ general account. The monies that back securities are held in the insurance companies’ separate accounts. Indexed annuities provide a guaranteed 0% floor and a minimum guaranteed surrender value, securities do not.

    Sixth, the SEC has been given the authority to regulate any entity they wish to declare regulation over via our U.S. Constitution. That doesn’t mean that they will or should.

    Seventh, indexed annuity purchasers are not referred to as “investors.” Only those who purchase securities/investments, which risk loss of principal and gains, are referred to as “investors.” The NAIC does not (and never has) permit the use of the word “investment” nor “investor” with fixed insurance products such as indexed annuities.

    Eighth, purchasers of indexed already have more than “basic protection,” and that includes senior purchasers. It appears that you are unfamiliar with the current regulatory structure that indexed annuities operate under, which is very thorough and effective. The insurance commissioners regulate indexed annuities with rigorous standard non-forfeiture laws, advertising guidelines, suitability regulations, and other rules. The states hold the authority to take sanctions against insurance agents including, but not limited to, license revocation, penalties and fines. An interesting comparison of state and federal regulation exists relative to annuity complaints specifically. If I need to make a complaint on an indexed annuity, the state insurance division has to respond to me within ten days; and I incur no cost in my efforts to resolve the problem. Compare this with the exhaustive complaint process on the securities side; delays, lawyers, and a lot of my money spent. Yes, SEC regulation  is different, but it most definitely is not better than insurance regulation.

    Ninth, I have NEVER heard of anyone “tricking [someone] into purchasing [an indexed annuity] under false pretenses.” I am the foremost authority on indexed annuities, and I have worked with indexed insurance products since shortly after their introduction. I not only work with regulators and litigators on these products, but also with compliance professionals from every company in this market, and I have never heard of this. Certainly, there have been instances of someone purchasing a product that they did not properly understand (which occurs with the purchase of all types of insurance, investment, and banking products). However, I think that your accusation is not only false and inflated, but a little harsh.

    Tenth, neither the SEC nor the North American Securities Administrations Association (NASAA) are reputable sources of information on indexed annuities. In fact, neither the SEC nor NASAA have any regulatory authority or experience with indexed annuities. In addition, the SEC has a vested interest in indexed annuities being regulated as securities so that they can increase their revenue and job security. In the future, if you are looking for a reliable regulatory resource on fixed insurance products (such as indexed annuities), I encourage you to seek out Susan Voss, the insurance commissioner of the state of Iowa. Not only is she credible, but 40.82% of indexed annuity sales flow through Iowa-domiciled insurance companies; for that reason she has become an authority on the products. Let me know if you need her contact information, and I happy to oblige.

    Eleventh, the NASAA “survey” may have identified indexed annuities as ONE of the products used in senior investment fraud in the attached report, but so were certificates of deposit (CDs) and more than a dozen other products. It is important to note that indexed annuities are just a tool in the financial professional’s toolbox. Would you outlaw hammers because a serial murderer used them to plummet their victims? I would think it would be rather difficult to build a house without a hammer…in the same manner, it is not good to damn indexed annuities because you heard a story about someone behaving badly while suggesting an indexed annuity.

    Twelfth, there is no evidence that the currently indexed annuity regulatory structure is not functioning properly. Until someone is able to provide evidence of such, I would suggest that we start questioning why the SEC is trying to expand their regulatory realm. This is the organization that let Bernard Madoff swindle $50 billion from American’s retirement nest eggs. Clear warning signs of Madoff’s fraud began to emerge as much as a decade before he was caught, and yet SEC did nothing. This is the same organization that your organization suggests regulate indexed insurance products? I think you should re-think that philosophy based on this alone.

    Thirteenth, Wall Street is not synonymous with the life insurance industry. Wall Street sells securities products, not life insurance products.

    Fourteenth,  indexed annuities have no “costs.” All annuities have surrender charges whether fixed, indexed, or variable- if this is what you are referring to. There are indexed annuities with surrender charges as short as three years. In addition, EVERY indexed annuity permits penalty-free withdrawals of 10% of the annuity’s value annually. Some even allow as much as 50% of the annuity’s value to be withdrawn in a single year. Moreover, 9 out of 10 indexed annuities provide a waiver of the surrender charges, should the annuitant need access to their money in events such as nursing home confinement, terminal illness, disability, and even unemployment. Couple this with the fact these products pay the full account value to the beneficiary upon death, and I think that you’ll see that consumers have tremendous access to their cash value when they purchase indexed annuities. These are some of the most liquid retirement income products available today!

    Fifteenth, sales “abuses” are not “rampant” in the indexed annuity industry. See the previously mentioned complaint data for support of this.

    Sixteenth, indexed annuities are not “hybrid products” and they do not “combine insurance and securities.” They are fixed annuities; the client’s monies are never at risk of loss from market fluctuations with indexed annuities, as they are with securities.

    Seventeenth, there is no need for anyone to “crack down on abusive financial products” in relation to indexed annuities. The rare instances of abuse here are far less than in the products that the SEC regulates! And need I remind you that these products, in and of themselves, are not bad. No insurance product is. Are financial services products sometimes used in the process of abuse? Yes. However, that does not make the products bad.

    The lack of journalistic integrity with this post is extremely alarming. Don’t you have any regard for the TRUTH? It seems like you decided to post an article based on rumors and anecdotal information alone. At one time, The Huffington Post was a highly-regarded resource. With a habit of posting such blatantly-false pieces with such a lack of fact checking, I have to question the future reputation of your paper. I would suggest that removal or correction of this article would be a step in the right direction.

    Should you have a need for a fact-checking source on fixed insurance products, such as indexed annuities, in the future- please do not hesitate to reach out to us. Thank you.

    Sheryl J. Moore

    President and CEO

    AnnuitySpecs.com

    LifeSpecs.com

    IndexedAnnuityNerd.com

    Advantage Group Associates, Inc.

    (515) 262-2623 office

    (515) 313-5799 cell

    (515) 266-4689 fax

    Originally Posted on July 9, 2010 by Sheryl J. Moore.

    Categories: Negative Media
    currency