We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,131)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (273)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Response: Some Advisers Dismayed By Indexed Annuity Regulation

    July 19, 2010 by Sheryl J. Moore

    PDF for Setting it Straight with WSJ4

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE CAN BE FOUND AT: Some Advisors Dismayed By Indexed Annuity Regulation

     Ms. Maxey,

    I am an independent market research analyst who specializes exclusively in the indexed annuity and indexed life markets. I have tracked the companies, products, marketing, and sales of these products for over a decade. I used to provide similar services for fixed and variable products, but I believe so strongly in the value proposition of indexed products that I started my own company focusing on IAs exclusively. I do not endorse any company or financial product, and millions look to us for accurate, unbiased information on the insurance market. In fact, we are the firm that regulators look to, and work with, when needing assistance with these products.

    I am contacting you, as the author of an article that was published by The Wall Street Journal, “Some Advisors Dismayed By Indexed Annuity Regulation.” This article had a number of inaccurate and misleading statements about indexed annuities in it. I am contacting you in response to these inaccuracies, so that you can address them and ensure that your readers have accurate, unbiased information on these products in the future.

    While your article does not say directly that it is the opinion of WSJ that indexed annuities are used for “inappropriate sales,” it certainly reads that way. In actuality, the indexed annuity industry has had a robust annuity suitability program in place since just after the turn of the century. In addition, consumer complaints are certainly not indicative of inappropriate sales. In fact, they illuminate that the indexed annuity market is much more “suitable” than many other markets. See data below from the National Association of Insurance Commissioner’s Closed Complaint Database on annuities:

    TOTAL INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS FOR 2006: 187

    TOTAL INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS FOR 2007: 235

    TOTAL INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS FOR 2008: 220

    TOTAL INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS FOR 2009: 148

    Based on our research, this results in average annual complaints as follows:

    AVERAGE INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS PER COMPANY 2006: 4.35

    AVERAGE INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS PER COMPANY 2007: 4.12

    AVERAGE INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS PER COMPANY 2008: 3.86

    AVERAGE INDEXED ANNUITY COMPLAINTS PER COMPANY 2009: 3.29

    So, not only have complaints on these indexed annuities declined annually for the past three years, but the average has declined consistently for the past four years. Conversely, variable annuity complaints (which are overseen by the Securities and Exchange Commission) have always been greater than the number of indexed annuity complaints, and have risen in recent years. Certainly, we do strive for 100% customer satisfaction in the insurance market, but I would contend that an average of only 3.29 complaints annually, per company, is quite reasonable and not indicative of “inappropriate sales.”

    Your description of indexed annuities is quite disingenuous. You are quick to say that they “are tied to the performance of stock indexes,” alluding that the product should be sold by those who sell stocks. However, you leave out the fact that indexed annuities have a minimum 0% annual floor and minimum guarantees, like other fixed annuities (which are sold by insurance agents). These features make them insurance, not securities/investments. Indexed annuity purchasers are never directly invested in the market, as these products merely received excess interest based on the performance of an outside stock index, such as the S&P 500. When the index goes down, the client receives zero interest. When the index goes up, they receive a gain subject to a limit. This is a value proposition that those directly invested in the market could only WISH they had when the market collapsed in March of 2008.

    In addition, indexed annuity purchasers are not referred to as “investors.” Investors purchase investments such as stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and variable annuities- products where you can lose principal and gains due to market fluctuations. These products are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Indexed annuities are fixed insurance products; similar to fixed annuities and whole life insurance. These fixed insurance products never put the purchaser’s principal or gains at risk due to market volatility. Indexed annuities, like other fixed insurance products, are regulated by the 50 state insurance commissioners of the United States. Together, they form the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). Only those who purchase securities/investments, which risk loss of principal and gains, are referred to as “investors.” The NAIC does not (and never has) permitted the use of the word “investment” nor “investor” with fixed insurance products such as indexed annuities.

    The Financial Planning Coalition (FPC) is obviously not up-to-speed on the regulation that indexed annuities currently operate under. Indexed annuities have been regulated as fixed insurance products since their introduction to the insurance market on February 5, 1995. There has been no evidence to suggest that the NAIC has done anything but a stupendous job regulating these products. Indeed the currently regulatory structure that dictates the sales of indexed annuities is very effective. The insurance commissioners regulate indexed annuities with rigorous standard non-forfeiture laws, advertising guidelines, suitability regulations, and other rules. The states hold the authority to take sanctions against insurance agents including, but not limited to, license revocation, penalties and fines. An interesting comparison of state and federal regulation exists relative to annuity complaints specifically. If I need to make a complaint on an indexed annuity, the state insurance division has to respond to me within ten days; and I incur no cost in my efforts to resolve the problem. Compare this with the exhaustive complaint process on the securities side; delays, lawyers, and a lot of my money spent. Yes, SEC regulation  is different, but it most definitely is not better than insurance regulation from the consumer’s standpoint. In light of this, the states are in a much better position to provide “investor protection,” than the SEC is.

    It disturbs me that you published Nigel Taylor’s comments without fact-checking them. This is the main reason that indexed annuities have amassed such a negative connotation in the press over the years. “Credible” newsmagazines such as The Wall Street Journal perpetuate misinformation on indexed annuities by publishing inaccurate information. Then, other journals point to WSJ when I correct them and say, “Well, if WSJ says it is true, then it must be!” In reality, very few indexed annuities carry “high sales commissions.” Only seven indexed annuities pay double-digit commissions and sales of these products accounted for less than 2% of total sales for 1Q2010. The average street level commission for indexed annuities is 6.35% as of 2Q2010. This commission is paid one-time, at point-of-sale; please keep this in mind when comparing it to the generous, consistent commissions that are paid on products such as mutual funds. In truth, there is not a single indexed annuity that pays a commission as high as 14%, contrary to what Mr. Taylor says. How scary that such a blatant falsehood could be printed in your journal!

    What is more, Mr. Taylor is also wrong about indexed annuities’ surrender charges. The average surrender charge as of 1Q2010 is ten years, and the average first-year penalty is 10.61% (this penalty declines annually beginning at the end of year one). There are indexed annuities with surrender periods as short as three years and as long as sixteen. There certainly is not any indexed annuity with a surrender charge of 20 years! Again- it is alarming how such a fabrication could make its way into a newspaper that so many Americans look to for information on financial services products! The truth is that indexed annuities do not prevent purchasers from accessing “their money without premature-use charges.” All annuities have surrender charges whether fixed, indexed, or variable. EVERY indexed annuity permits penalty-free withdrawals of 10% of the annuity’s value annually. Some even allow as much as 50% of the annuity’s value to be withdrawn in a single year. In addition, 9 out of 10 indexed annuities provide a waiver of the surrender charges, should the annuitant need access to their money in events such as nursing home confinement, terminal illness, disability, and even unemployment. Couple this with the fact these products pay the full account value to the beneficiary upon death, and I think that you’ll see that consumers have tremendous access to their cash value when they purchase indexed annuities. These are some of the most liquid retirement income products available today!

    If more people understood what surrender charges do for the purchaser, they would appreciate them more. The surrender charge on a fixed, indexed, or variable annuity is a promise by the consumer not to withdraw 100% of their monies prior to the end of the surrender charge period. This allows the insurance company to make an informed decision on which conservative investments to use to make a return on the clients’ premium (i.e. 7-year grade “A” bonds for a seven-year surrender charge annuity or 10-year grade “A” bonds for a ten-year surrender charge annuity). Investing the consumer’s premium payment in appropriate investments allows the insurance company to be able to pay a competitive interest rate to the consumer on their annuity each year. In turn, it also protects the insurance company from a “run on the money” and allows them to maintain their ratings and financial strength. I personally appreciate the value of the surrender charge on an annuity and if more consumers understood them, they would too. Regardless, Mr. Taylor’s uninformed comments are truly unappreciated in terms of commissions and surrender charges on these products.

    I appreciate your desire to provide “both sides of the story” with this article, Daisy. I truly do. However, this article falls short of being accurate and unbiased. I humbly extend my services to you, should you have a need for unbiased, accurate information on indexed insurance products in the future. In the interim, I believe that a correction to this article is warranted. I know that The Wall Street Journal would not want to disseminate such inaccurate information about ANY financial services product. Regardless of what your sources believe, these products are not what they perceive. We appreciate your accurate reporting of the FACTS, and I look forward to hearing from you.

    Thank you.

    Sheryl J. Moore

    President and CEO

    AnnuitySpecs.com

    LifeSpecs.com

    IndexedAnnuityNerd.com

    Advantage Group Associates, Inc.

    (515) 262-2623 office

    (515) 313-5799 cell

    (515) 266-4689 fax

    Originally Posted on July 19, 2010 by Sheryl J. Moore.

    Categories: Negative Media
    currency