We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Should Hartford’s Annuity Holders Be Worried?

    March 24, 2012 by Leslie Scism

     

    Under pressure from hedge-fund titan John Paulson, Hartford Financial Services Group said Wednesday it would exit its annuity business and weigh a sale of a large portion of its life-insurance operations. Hartford will stop new annuity sales on April 27.

    So what does this mean for holders of Hartford annuities?

    In industry parlance, Hartford is putting its annuity operation into “runoff.” The term can sound ominous to a policyholder. But it doesn’t mean the company is setting a block of business into a raft and casting it adrift.

    In Hartford’s instance, it means that the company isn’t going to be selling new annuities. It is discontinuing sales. But it is obligated under state-insurance regulations to protect its existing customers and service their accounts until the day that all of the accounts have been drawn down.

    Transactions like the one proposed by the Hartford are typically subject to approval by state regulators. Their sole interest is to protect policyholders, not to look out for Paulson’s pocketbook or that of any other shareholder.

    So regulators would be expected to  require that the runoff unit remain with the same reserves and backup capital that the regulators previously required to protect existing accountholders.

    “As the Department does with any proposed transaction of this type, we will review it with great diligence to ensure that the commitments to all policyholders are protected,” said Connecticut Insurance Commissioner Thomas B. Leonardi in a statement Wednesday. “To comment on any specifics would be premature and inappropriate at this time.”

    In a statement Wednesday, Moody’s Investors Service changed its outlook to negative from stable for Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance Co.’s “insurance financial strength” rating; it is A3. This is the unit containing the majority of the individual annuity business. Moody’s noted there would remain strong ties between the life and property-and-casualty businesses, and the rating agency expects that Hartford would provide support to the life group in a stress scenario.

    Hartford would be expected to save money by laying off salespeople who market to financial advisers, product-design people, marketing staff and so on. But it would be expected to retain the employees who  handle such things as customers’ money transfers, withdrawal requests, beneficiary changes and  account statements.

    With variable annuities, remember, customers’ money is in mutual-fund-like accounts. These are so-called separate accounts, not the “general” account of the insurer itself. So nothing changes with their money: It stays at the fund manager where it is.

    For people who own Hartford’s fixed annuities or indexed annuities, though, their money is part of the insurer’s general account. But the same applies about regulators looking to ensure that same level of required reserves and backup capital will be there to protect them.

    Copyright 2008 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

    This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit

    www.djreprints.com

    Originally Posted at The Wall Street Journal on March 21, 2012 by Leslie Scism.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency