We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Testing the 4%-a-Year Retirement Rule

    March 10, 2012 by Shefali Anand

    • March 5, 2012
    MIXING IT UP

    Testing the 4%-a-Year Retirement Rule

    The adviser who coined this rule of thumb for withdrawals is watching how it holds up in tough markets
    By SHEFALI ANAND

    The next five years could determine whether a rule of thumb for retirees’ withdrawals from their portfolios remains valid in these turbulent times, says Bill Bengen, a financial planner in Southern California.

    Mr. Bengen is the creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals.

    In a study published in 1994, he said that if retirees withdrew 4% of their nest egg in the first year, and then increased the dollar amount by the inflation rate every year, their savings would easily last 30 years. He assumed that the portfolio was held in a tax-deferred account and was evenly split between large-company stocks and U.S. Treasury bonds.

    In a subsequent study, Mr. Bengen added U.S. small-company stocks to the mix, which increased the portfolio’s volatility and potential return. To adjust for this, he revised the withdrawal rule to 4.5%.

    In recent years, as stocks have become more volatile, many observers have wondered whether Mr. Bengen’s rule still holds. So far, he thinks it does.

    However, he says the next five years could be crucial, particularly for individuals who retired in 2000 and have experienced two major stock-market downturns since then. He expects stock returns to be low for a while; if that is coupled with high inflation rates, “then retirees have a big problem,” he says.

    He doesn’t think a sharply higher inflation rate is likely in the near future, “but you never know,” he says.

    In this column, we feature model portfolios from prominent financial advisers who invest primarily in mutual funds and exchange-traded funds. Mr. Bengen has been a practicing financial planner since 1989 and currently runs a solo practice from his home offices in Eastlake and La Quinta, Calif. He manages $50 million for around 80 clients.

    Mr. Bengen says that retirees whose withdrawals lately have gone up to 5.5% or 6% of the current value of their account should consider taking steps to protect their nest egg.

    One option is to put 10% of their savings into an immediate annuity now, to guarantee an income stream for life, and consider buying another annuity in a couple of years. “You don’t have to go whole hog,” he says, addressing the concern of some retirees that annuitizing all their savings would leave no money for their heirs. If the markets zoom up in the next couple of years, the second annuity might not be needed, he says.

    Alternatively, he says, retirees can look at taking a reverse mortgage, which basically converts a portion of the equity in their home into cash. “Both tools do very similar jobs—they just give you extra cash” to augment investment income, says Mr. Bengen.

    Here, he shares the portfolio of a 60-year-old client, which is representative of his choices for many clients.

    STOCKS: The portfolio has just 32% in stocks, partly because Mr. Bengen has been holding a lot of cash in recent years.

    “The most important thing right now is capital preservation,” he says. He is concerned that large movements of money globally are distorting the stock market.

    “It’s a very uncomfortable time,” he says. To deal with this, he has been very active in recent years in moving in and out of investments as market conditions change.

    He expects stocks to extend their recent gains in the next few months, because he believes central banks will continue to pump money into the global financial system and much of that will find its way into stocks.

    He invests 24% of the portfolio in U.S. stocks, with more than a third of that in the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF, at 9% of the portfolio.

    To provide a cushion for the portfolio, Mr. Bengen buys some funds that invest in dividend-paying stocks. He puts 5% in iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend Index and 2% in Utilities Select Sector SPDR .

    He also uses two funds that can bet against stocks— Marketfield Fund, which can own stocks, bonds, commodities and derivatives, at 3% of the portfolio, and Hussman Strategic Growth, which primarily invests in stocks and derivatives, at 2%.

    One percent of the portfolio is in FPA Crescent, whose manager can buy stocks and bonds or hold cash with the goal of “equity-like return with less risk than the stock market,” according to the fund’s website.

    Mr. Bengen recently made a 2% investment in the stock of Archer Daniels Midland Co., a grain trading and processing company based in Decatur, Ill. He expects strong growth in the food and agriculture industry, plus the shares have a dividend yield of about 2.2%.

    For his foreign-stock allocation, Mr. Bengen invests 8% in the Vanguard MSCI Emerging Markets ETF. “The developing world offers much greater growth opportunity” than developed economies, he says.

    BONDS AND CASH: The portfolio has 47% in bonds and 13% in cash.

    The majority of the bond allocation is in two ETFs from Vanguard Group that invest in high-quality government and corporate bonds. Twenty eight percent of the portfolio is in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF, which owns bonds with an average maturity of seven years, and 7% is in Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF, whose typical bond matures in less than three years.

    Mr. Bengen invests 7% in DoubleLine Total Return Bond, which invests in government-agency and mortgage bonds, including higher-yielding, low-quality bonds.

    He also owns a fund that solely buys low-quality, or junk, bonds, the SPDR Barclays Capital High Yield Bond ETF, at 5%. He likes the fund’s high yield, at 7.3%, and potential price appreciation.

    GOLD: Mr. Bengen has owned a gold fund since 2008. He currently allocates 8% of the portfolio to iShares Gold Trust . He says that in this uncertain environment, with many central banks printing money, gold helps preserve value. Gold also is very valuable as a hedge against the U.S. dollar, he adds.

    Ms. Anand is a personal-finance columnist for The Wall Street Journal, based in New Delhi. Email: shefali.anand@wsj.com.

    Originally Posted at The Wall Street Journal on March 5, 2012 by Shefali Anand.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency