We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Response from NAFA: Indexed Annuities May Be Risky Investments

    April 23, 2012 by Pamela M. Heinrich, Esq.

     

    Click here to read NAFA’s response to Meiselman, Denlea, Packman, Carton, & Eberz P.C.: http://nafa.com/2012/04/18/nafa-responds-to-indexed-annuities-may-be-risky-investments%E2%80%9D/

    Dear Mr. Denlea,

    At the National Association for Fixed Annuities (NAFA), we recognize that the California indexed annuity case referenced in your blog article may signal an opportunity for your firm.  However, if a client contacts you as a result and you start to do some research, you will find that your understanding of indexed annuities is surprisingly flawed.

    Consider the following:

    You said, “The premium paid for an indexed annuity is put in an index fund. The returns are then based on the performance of the entire index.  While stocks in one category may increase, stocks in another may decrease, so an investor should always be prepared to take a loss when investing in an indexed annuity.

    While you are correct that the premium paid for an indexed annuity is invested by the carrier, often in a mix of bonds and stock market index options, you are wrong in stating that the decrease in stocks will lead to a loss in the value of the indexed annuity.  In fact, the value of the annuity never decreases because stocks do.  The insurance company bears ALL of the portfolio’s market risk. If, for example, the S&P 500 index were to fall in value, even crash, the owner of an indexed annuity loses nothing.  At worst, an indexed annuity can credit no interest, but a loss in the market index cannot cause a loss of value in an indexed annuity.

    You said, “Insurance agents like to sell indexed annuities because the commissions they receive from insurers are high.”

    AnnuitySpecs publishes a quarterly industry sales survey on indexed annuities.  Their most recent report indicated that the average sales commission paid on an indexed annuity is 6.3%.  Considering that the average surrender period on an indexed annuity is 10 years, the average agent commission is about 0.63% per year that the client’s money is in the annuity, which is below the typical 1% per year asset fees taken on other financial products.

    You said, “In the California case, one elderly investor paid $14,000, or an 8% commission. If the money had been withdrawn within the first year of ownership, there would have been a penalty equal to 12.5% of the principal.”

    Actually, in the California case, the purchaser paid no commission at all – the issuing insurance carrier paid the agent’s commission.  Commission expenses are built into the annuity’s benefits and limitations, similar to many other services and products that people routinely purchase like life insurance and cars.

    One of those limitations is the surrender charge and its major purpose is to impose a time commitment agreed to and made by the annuitant that allows the insurance carrier to safely invest in the combination of long-term investment vehicles that are necessary to create the attractive blend of safety features and interest-crediting potential that indexed annuities offer.

    Annuity owners who break the time commitment cost the carrier money since it needs to unwind those long-term investments prematurely and potentially at a loss.  Carriers could recoup those losses by charging fees across their entire customer base, but instead they do what is much more equitable – they charge those customers who break their time commitment a surrender charge, thus they effectively reward those customers who abide by their time commitment.

    Ironically, if you would like to put your retirement savings into a financial product where your money has no market risk, then you may find that a fixed indexed annuity could be attractive.  In fact, it is interesting that you didn’t point out that in the California case the $175,000 premium was paid to an insurance company and that the company returned the entire premium without penalty plus the interest earned between the time of purchase and when it was returned to the buyer.

    To find out more about how indexed annuities really work, I encourage you to visit www.fixedannuityfacts.org.

    Sincerely,

     

    Pamela M. Heinrich, Esq. Legal Counsel The National Association for Fixed Annuities

    Originally Posted at NAFA on April 16, 2012 by Pamela M. Heinrich, Esq..

    Categories: Negative Media
    currency