We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,244)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (422)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (804)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • The Annuity Defined … Really?

    June 1, 2012 by Linda Koco

    Posted By: Editor On 5/30/2012 1:01:00 PM

    By Linda Koco
    AnnuityNews

    What is an annuity? Advisors run into that question a lot. Despite the fact that annuities have been around for years, many consumers just don’t get it.

    That lack of understanding gets in the way of good retirement income planning. If people don’t know about, or understand, annuities, why should they consider purchasing one to help finance their retirement years?

    Fortunately, most annuity professionals have their definitions down pat, and they are proficient at simplifying the words and drawing analogies to help a client understand. In addition, they have company materials they can give to the client that provide more information.

    The Internet problem

    Unfortunately, a lot of consumers do their research about insurance products on the Internet, and that bollixes things up. This is because much of the information they get on the net comes from non-annuity industry resources. 

    Today, for instance, a search on “what is an annuity” turned up, on page one, definitions from Wikipedia, the Merriam-Webster – The Free Dictionary and even WiseGEEK. 

    Five definitions did come from financial-related websites — Investopedia, BankRate, Personal Dividends, Money.CNN and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)—but again, these are not annuity industry sources.

    Only two definitions were from insurance entities—the Insurance Information Institute and AXA Equitable.

    The good news is that web surfers who happen to click onto web pages two and up will find plenty of annuity industry definitions. But, if the appetite for information is already sated by reading the page one definitions, a lot of people won’t even bother to click deeper into their search results. It is a known fact that page one of search results gets the most clicks.

    Besides, most people don’t go around thinking, “I want to hear about what the annuity industry has to say about that.”

    This means the annuity industry will not have much success with educating consumers, in its own words, on “what is an annuity” via Internet search.

    Some definitions are flawed

    If the page one definitions are accurate and clear, perhaps this is not a huge problem. But a quick scan through the definitions in the above search reveals that, although most are reasonably accurate, several have flaws.

    For instance, some present terms and concepts in the definition that themselves need defining. For example, the WiseGEEK definition rightly points out that annuities involve distribution of money and are typically part of a retirement plan to ensure a fixed, stable income. But it says this income goes to an “annuitant, or recipient.” That reference to annuitant or recipient will cause a lot of consumer eyes to glaze over. “What is an annuitant?” They will wonder.

    To its credit, the website does highlight the word annuitant, so the curious can click the link to find out. But how what percentage of web visitors will click on through to find out?

    The website does anticipate the problem, and so adds the words “or recipient” right after the word annuitant. It gets a star for doing that. However, the term recipient is still a few heartbeats away from where curious readers might want to be. It is dry and seems to be about someone else.  The content that follows the definition does provide some amplification, but if the reader is already stumped or disengaged, it may be for naught.

    By comparison, annuity professionals typically do not mention the word annuitant to a consumer until much later in the conversation. They have learned, from many years of experience, that this word is hard for most people to swallow. For them, the fewer the technical terms the better, especially early on.

    Making it personal

    Many advisors will introduce the annuity payout idea by using simple terms and making it personal. For instance, they might say the annuity pays an income stream to you.

    The SEC did get that part right. Its annuity definition says that an annuity is “a contract between you and an insurance company that is designed to meet retirement and other long-range goals, under which you make a lump-sum payment or series of payments. In return, the insurer agrees to make periodic payments to you beginning immediately or at some future date.”

    That’s not bad. In fact, it’s pretty good. However the references to making a “lump-sum payment or series of payment” and to the insurer making “periodic payments” sort of gums it up—because this does not say the payments are money.  Naturally, most people know that “payments” entail money. But more people seem to lock onto to the word money than they do to the words making payments. 

    Also missing from the SEC definition is reference to the annuity’s ability to pay the consumer a regular income. It does talk about periodic “payments” but not income. The word choice is unfortunate. It is likely that more consumers can visualize what the product does upon learning that it that pays out a regular income, such as monthly, quarterly, etc. as compared to learning that it will make periodic payments.

    Some of the other definitions use lengthy sentences to express the thoughts when short ones would read more smoothly. A few have legalistic overtones (i.e., “when an insured party…”). One even mentions the A-word, annuitization, right in the definition.  Ugh.

    The point is, several of the annuity definitions don’t hit the consumers where they live, in language they might use in everyday life.   

    An insurance industry definition

    Now consider the following definition from the Insured Retirement Institute, an insurance trade group with deep knowledge of annuities and growing consumer outreach. This definition says an annuity is “an insurance agreement that comes in a number of different forms and can (1) help individuals accumulate money for retirement through tax-deferred savings, (2) provide them with monthly income that can be guaranteed to last for as long as they live, or (3) do both.”

    This definition is absent the “you” terminology but it does talk in terms of money and guaranteed income. Unfortunately, this definition does not pop up on page one of the annuity definition results. That’s really too bad.

    There was a time, in the 1990s, that some financial writers tried to define a particular type of annuity — the variable annuity — as a basket of mutual funds in a tax-deferred wrapper. That roiled a lot of industry experts since the definition made no mention of insurance, guarantees, or monthly income. But it hung on for quite a while, because it was like a “handle” — short and sweet, easy to say and remember.

    That nomenclature has now faded. However, figuring out how to define the annuity accurately and clearly to consumers continues to be a problem. It’s great that industry insiders get it, but potential annuity buyers need to get it, too.

    Linda Koco, MBA, is a contributing editor to AnnuityNews, specializing in life insurance, annuities and income planning. Linda can be reached at linda.koco@innfeedback.com.

    © Entire contents copyright 2012 by InsuranceNewsNet.com Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reprinted without the expressed written consent from InsuranceNewsNet.com.

    Originally Posted at AnnuityNews on May 30, 2012 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency