We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,128)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (272)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Is Washington endorsing annuities?

    January 24, 2013 by Stan Haithcock

    Is Washington endorsing annuities?

     

    In recent weeks, I have been inundated by annuity industry promotional pieces that reference the Government Accounting Office and their supposed endorsement of annuities.

     

    If you haven’t heard this pitch, you will, so it’s important to know exactly what those GAO studies say, why they said it, and what specific types of annuity strategies they’re talking about.

     

    Last week, I was at an event where I heard a phenomenal presentation by Dr. Larry Arnn, president of Hillsdale College . One of the more interesting things he said was that our country has had to deal with three huge events in its history; the Civil War, World War II, and our current struggle with the national debt.

     

    The ongoing debt issue is one that we are obviously still in the process of solving, and might be the reason that the GAO is “suggesting” that people need to consider annuities for their additional lifetime income needs in order to lessen the government’s perceived responsibility to fill that gap.

     

    We all know that Social Security was never implemented to provide all of a person’s retirement income, and the GAO is now suggesting that you consider creating a lifetime income stream with either some or all of your retirement lump sum.

     

    This is a rational thought, but one that also indicates the needed adjustments (i.e. cuts) to Social Security benefits as we know them today. A logical guess as to why the GAO is suggesting that the public now consider annuities is because the need people to start taking more responsibility for their own lifetime income needs, and not just rely on Social Security and the government. Imagine that!

     

    One of the GAO reports concerning both annuities and Social Security is titled, “Ensuring Income throughout Retirement Requires Difficult Choices.” Here are a couple of key points and GAO suggestions within this report.

     

    •Convert your pension/retirement plan to a lifetime income annuity in lieu of taking a lump sum.

     

    •At least half of a person’s retirement savings should be placed into a lifetime income annuity.

     

    Here’s what this GAO report didn’t say that you need to understand. The GAO did not recommend deferred products like variable annuities or equity indexed annuities for income now needs. They were only talking about single premium immediate annuities (which they call a lifetime income annuity) within this specific report for that solution. Single Premium Immediate Annuities (SPIA’s) are the most efficient, lowest commission, pro-customer annuity strategy for lifetime income when payments are needed to start immediately.

     

    SPIA’s are pretty much commodity products where insurance carriers bid to provide your lifetime income stream. There are about 50 real carriers that are competitive in this arena, and you should have your agent use quoting systems like CANNEX so that you can see a full listing of the best national quotes for your specific age and life expectancy.

     

    The GAO also released a report this past December called, “Annuities with Guaranteed Lifetime Withdrawals Have Both Benefits and Risks, but Regulation Varies Across States.” Title brevity is not the GAO’s strong suit to say the least!

     

    This study was geared more toward deferred annuities that have attached income riders. Income riders are contractually guaranteed benefits that you attach to a deferred annuity (and pay an annual fee for), and those benefits can only be used for lifetime income and can’t be accessed in a lump sum. Income riders should be used for your lifetime income to start at a later date, or what I call target date income planning. What the report did not address are the new Longevity Annuity strategies that are now competing with income riders.

     

    Below are a few main points from this report:

     

    •Annuities with guaranteed lifetime withdrawals can help ensure that you do not outlive your assets.

     

    •Consumers can benefit by having a steady income stream of income while maintaining access to their assets for unexpected or other expenses.

     

    Income riders are the hottest thing going in the annuity industry right now (for both good and bad reasons), and work perfectly for target date income planning when the customer understands exactly how they work and fit within a portfolio. Just like quoting single premium immediate annuities, you should also receive multiple income rider quotes as well because lifetime payouts vary with each carrier and product, and there is a lot of confusion created by how income riders are presented and sold.

     

    As I have said before, annuities should be used as transfer of risk solutions and owned for their contractual guarantees only.

     

    Annuities aren’t new to the investment world, and were originally designed over 2,000 years ago during the Roman era to provide lifetime income payments. Enough of the history lesson, but you need to know that annuities have been around for a very long time as a solution for lifetime income.

     

    With these two studies, it looks like Washington in now trying to transfer the risk of lifetime income as well in order to lessen the dependency on government payments.

     

    Whether you need income right now, or income to start at a later date, annuities can provide the additional lifetime income that you need to maintain your retirement lifestyle. Thanks to Washington (and the GAO) for the annuity plug. Anything to help people better understand the proper role and use of annuities is appreciated.

     

    That role and use is lifetime income.

    Originally Posted at Market Watch on January 22, 2013 by Stan Haithcock.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency