We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,131)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (273)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Why there is no conflict of interest between financial planners and clients

    January 24, 2013 by David Lewis

    If an advisor values his business and his clients, then how do his personal interests clash with those of his clients? Answer: They don’t.

     

    It’s not uncommon for industry organizations to claim that financial planners must balance “conflicts of interest” when working with clients. For example, the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards states, in it’s code of ethics, “Fairness requires impartiality, intellectual honesty and disclosure of material conflicts of interest.”

     

    What does the CFP board consider a conflict of interest?

     

    “Conflict(s) of interest exist when a CFP Board designee’s financial, business, property and/or personal interests, relationships or circumstances reasonably may impair his/her ability to offer objective advice, recommendations or services.”

     

    In other words, the CFP board believes that an advisor’s personal interests can clash with the client’s and interfere with his ability to offer objective advice. Is this true? Not really.

     

    The importance of context

     

    There are no conflicts of interest among rational individuals. That’s because rational people take a long-term view of things and consider the impact of their decisions over the course of their entire life.

     

    The context of human life is 70 years, 80 years, perhaps more. Pursuing your self-interest means pursuing what is necessary for life, your entire life. These needs include both physical needs (i.e. food and water) and psychological needs (i.e. happiness, which could include an endless number of material or spiritual values). In no case would a rational individual take actions that allegedly benefit him in the short-term at the expense of his life 20 or 30 years from now. In fact, any such short-term benefit isn’t really a benefit at all.

     

    If an advisor values his business and his clients, then how do his personal interests clash with those of his clients? Answer: They don’t.

     

    The vanishing conflict

     

    One example frequently used to demonstrate a conflict of interest is the charging of commissions on products like life insurance or mutual funds. Because the advisor earns a commission on the sale of a product like life insurance, it’s said that the recommendation puts the advisor’s interests at odds with the client’s. After all, why wouldn’t the advisor seek out the highest commission at the expense of the client? He stands to make a lot of money from some of these products.

     

    But why do rational advisors go into business? To make money. To build a client base. It’s not in their best interest to harm their clients. If they do, they’ll earn a bad reputation and eventually go out of business. Taking advantage of clients is career suicide. Just ask Bernie Madoff.

     

    Does that mean that advisors should never sell highly commissionable whole life insurance? Universal life insurance? Variable life? No, not at all. Selling on commission poses no inherent harm to the client. It’s true that high-commissioned life insurance products often result in a lower cash value benefit for the client, but this isn’t always at odds with the client’s best interest. When a client does business with a financial advisor, and the client discloses the values he wishes to pursue, the advisor has to earn the client’s business by helping him achieve his values. This is really what matters most. If the client is able to successfully achieve his values, the advisor’s pay is irrelevant. If the advisor makes a lot of money in the process, good for him.

     

    Moreover, just like in any other industry, the advisor has a moral right to seek the highest pay he can earn in his business, just as the client has a moral right to negotiate for the lowest possible fees and expenses by shopping around. When both the advisor and the client can agree on the terms of the business transaction, then both of their interests are served. The so-called “conflict of interest” vanishes, regardless of whether the adviser is paid by commission, fee and commission, or fee only.

    Originally Posted at ProducersWEB on January 24, 2013 by David Lewis.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency