We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Vapor on paper: Coming to an annuity near you

    April 28, 2013 by Sheryl J. Moore

    The insurance division in the great state of Iowa (a.k.a. the indexed annuity capital of the world) will soon set forth a new regulation on annuity illustrations. This regulation, a directive that I’ve aided in crafting for nearly eight years, will actually hamper my company’s ability to make money.

    Illustrations ‑ lengthy documents that are generated by specialized software ‑ project how an insurance contract may perform over a period of time. These projections actually provide a year-by-year demonstration of how the insurance contract’s guaranteed minimum values will perform on a worst-case scenario basis, as well as how the non-guaranteed (current) values might perform on a best-case scenario basis. Seem like I’m a little bearish on illustrations? I have good reason to be.

    My career in the insurance industry began nearly 15 years ago and one of my first responsibilities was servicing orphaned Universal Life insurance policies that had been sold with illustrations showing 12 percent crediting rates. Translation: life insurance policies that no longer had agents servicing them, where the credited rate had dropped to the minimum, a whopping 8 percent decline over a period of 10 years or so (never mind that the insurance charges had often escalated conversely, further compounding the problem). Usually the customers that I spoke to were nearly elderly, often on fixed incomes, ill to the point that they were no longer insurable, and in a position where they were going to be forced to pay thousands to keep their life insurance, or risk losing their coverage because of an extreme change between what was projected in their illustration and what actually occurred.

    A $12.00 check

    From there, I went to work on a project where I helped to explain to life insurance purchasers why they received unsolicited checks in the mail (averaging $12.00 ‑ yes, I did get the decimals right on that one), as payment for a class action lawsuit settlement. Not surprisingly, the lawsuit was based on the premise that the projections of policy values on Whole Life insurance illustrations never came to fruition.

    Later I became the illustration software developer for the home office I was employed by. I actually programmed life insurance products into the illustration software that insurance agents still use today. Since then, I’ve spent years working with compliance departments, attorneys, regulators and legislators. Although just a small segment of the areas that I work with in this industry, the segment is large enough for a profound realization on the concept of illustrations.

    A chasm

    Class action lawsuits based on the chasm between actual and projected on those insurance illustrations have become nothing more than a “cost of doing business” in the life insurance industry. Every company selling cash value life insurance has been a victim with nary an exception. In fact, when performing an Internet search on “cash value life insurance illustration” for a definition for this article, the first hit is for a website that helps to prosecute companies for “unreasonable” illustrations.

    While illustrations can be a helpful tool, I feel that they are more of a liability than an aide. And when you consider that historically annuity illustrations have been provided by third-party vendors like me (but without my background, experience and credentials), it all combines into a recipe for disaster. Should someone without a degree be calculating projected values on these contracts? How safe do you think you are if your projections don’t have disclosures about the market’s performance not being an indicator of future policy results, etc.?

    Ultimately, the insurance company must have control over the illustrated values on insurance contracts; accuracy, proficiency and compliance must be safeguarded. And when these illustrations become available, they must be used with care. While life insurance could spare some reputation in the ‘90s, the annuity industry has had to fight for what very little we have to offer today.

     

    Originally Posted at LifeHealthPro on April 19, 2013 by Sheryl J. Moore.

    Categories: Sheryl's Articles
    currency