We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • New York Life Exec: Life Settlement Industry Should Strive for Standardization and Consumer Protections

    October 31, 2013 by Angelo Lewis, Senior Associate Editor, Best's Review

    NEW ORLEANS – States should work harder to institute consumer protections, standardization and methodologies when it comes to the life-settlement market, according to Scott Berlin, senior vice president at New York Life. He spoke with Best’s News Service at the American Council of Life Insurers Annual Conference in New Orleans.

    Q: If you could just first of all explain to us what a Medicaid viatical settlement is. If you want to start with what is a life settlement, we’ll just break it down.

    A: We’ll start with what a life settlement is. Life settlements were born out of the old viatical settlement market where there are private companies out there buying life insurance contracts from people who have impaired health because the intrinsic value of the life insurance contract is a lot greater when someone has impaired health because they are closer to death and closer to collecting on that policy, so there’s a lot of value in the contract and companies called life settlement companies are out there purchasing life insurance contracts. Viatical Medicaid life settlement is a new idea where people who are going on Medicaid sell their life insurance contracts to a viatical company with the proceeds of that settlement being used to pay for long-term care-type services to defray the cost of Medicaid.

    Q: In June, Texas became the first state to adopt the Medicaid Life Settlement Law, allowing state residents to use the proceeds to pay for private long-term care expenses. I was wondering if this is just a state thing or will there be implications for future Medicaid asset valuation?

    A: At the state level, what they’re attempting to do is to allow people to get value out of their life insurance contract without having to cash them in; with the proceeds being used to pay for Medicaid services. At the federal level, this will require an exemption because federal law does not recognize the Medicaid settlements as something that can be disqualified from the qualification for Medicaid.

    Q: What are the risks accompanying these Medicaid viatical settlements?

    A: Well, I think the risk is really inherent in the life settlement industry the way it’s constituted today. There’s very little consumer protection involved in life settlements. The way the market works today, the senior individual is required to negotiate with the life settlement company. There’s no standardization of practice and, if fact, two people who are the same age, who have the same health and the same policy can get two different offers from the same company based on how well they negotiate. So today it’s a little bit like buying a used car. You need to know how to negotiate and how far you can push the settlement company. And also there’s very little competition. There’s only one or two actively pursuing this market, so fair value economics haven’t yet kicked into this market. So it’s a little bit of buyer beware and I think that the states would do well to institute consumer protections into the process such as state filings of methodology and valuation of liabilities and things like that, similar to the way the insurance industry is regulated today.

    Q: So basically the life settlement industry is not regulated like the insurance industry is regulated?

    A: That’s correct. There’s not the same type of consumer protections in the settlement laws of the states. They do have certain regulations on the books but they’re not comprehensive enough.

    Q: Now, Scott, in your presentation you alluded to some options beside these types of contracts if people didn’t want to go this route. The broad question is how does this growth of this industry, at least the viatical settlement industry, how does that affect life insurers in terms of their product development? As you know, there hasn’t been a great history between the two industries.

    A: I don’t think that there’s a great impact any more. I would say if you went back five or 10 years, there was a situation where life insurance companies, particularly reinsurance companies, underestimated the mortality at the very advanced ages and therefore the pricing of senior life insurance contracts may have been subsidized by other areas of the business. As the life settlement industry came in and started to arbitrage that opportunity what’s happened is that the life insurance rates for seniors has gone up. Like any arbitrage opportunity that winds up getting closed. So I think that whatever was going to happen has happened already. Rates are higher and the arbitrage doesn’t exist anymore, at least not on a mass basis. But going forward I don’t think insurance companies are impacted one way or the other because we’re in the business of paying claims. That’s what we do. And whether we pay the claim to a beneficiary or we pay the claim to a life settlement company who has taken the policy over is really immaterial to the direct writer.

    Q: Do you have any closing comments about the subject?

    A: I think it’s a good idea to look for ways to cover and defray Medicaid costs, and certainly there are valuable contracts that are assets that people own so they should be informed on the options that they have with their policies, but it’s also very important that states take a step back and make sure that there’s adequate consumer protections in place to insure that they don’t get caught up with foul play. The way it works today is the deal that you get is very much based on how well you negotiate with the company and for the insurance industry that’s probably not an appropriate practice.

    The full interview with Berlin is available at http://www.ambest.com/v.asp?v=berlin1013

    (By Angelo Lewis, Senior Associate Editor, Best’s Review, Angelo.Lewis@ambest.com)

    Originally Posted at A.M. Best on October 30, 2013 by Angelo Lewis, Senior Associate Editor, Best's Review.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency