We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Industry Representatives to FIO: Move Cautiously Before Moving to Change Regulatory System

    February 6, 2014 by Jeff Jeffrey, Washington Bureau manager: jeff.jeffrey@ambest.com

    WASHINGTON – Insurance industry representatives told House lawmakers Feb. 4 that the Federal Insurance Office should help to fix inefficiencies in the regulation of the marketplace. But many of those who testified before the House Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance said the FIO should not move to establish “one-size-fits-all” regulations that could hamper competition both in the United States and internationally.

    Representatives of eight industry trade organizations testified before the subcommittee about a FIO report released in December that made a series of recommendations for ways to modernize the U.S. insurance regulatory system.

    The report drew praise from industry representatives for calling on Congress to pass the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers Reform Act, which deals with multistate licensing for insurance agents and brokers. The NARAB II bill, as it has become known, would create a nonprofit board that would allow insurance agents and brokers to obtain certification to operate on a multistate basis.

    FIO Director Michael McRaith also drew praise from representatives of the property/casualty for recommending that state regulators promote more free-market competition in pricing and that states better coordinate market conduct examinations.

    During the portion of the hearing dedicated to McRaith’s testimony, the FIO director said the federal government may be able to promote greater uniformity among the states in some aspects of insurance regulation (Best’s News Service, Feb 3, 2014).

    In addition to NARAB II, the former Illinois insurance commissioner cited producer licensing, product approval, reinsurance captives and mortgage insurance as areas where state regulators have failed to bring their regulations in line with one another, despite years of complaints from the industry about inefficiencies in the oversight process.

    However, the FIO should move cautiously in negotiations with international insurance supervisors, many of whom have sought to impose bank-centric regulations on the industry, industry representatives said.

    “A number of international standards are developed based on a different mission or market structure than those applicable in the U.S., for example shifting focus to protecting investors or employers, or the need to set a higher bar against failures because of the absence of the safety net of guaranty funds,” said Robert Restrepo Jr., head of State Auto Insurance Cos., who testified on behalf of the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “Imposing the same regulatory standards and trip wires on every country when the underlying regulatory missions and systems are fundamentally different is not always in the best interests of American consumers. ”

    The FIO has come out in support of an International Association of Insurance Supervisors proposal to include a global capital standard in the Common Framework for the Supervision of Internationally Active Insurance Groups.

    Industry trade groups have said imposing such a standard could put U.S. insurers at a competitive disadvantage when operating overseas.

    That said, J. Stephen “Stef” Zielezienski, senior vice president and general counsel for the American Insurance Association, said the FIO could prove instrumental in developing a single U.S. position that removes barriers to U.S. competitiveness.

    “This is certainly easier said than done due to existing constitutional and statutory limitations that apply to those charged with developing, negotiating, and implementing any new rules for a complicated set of issues, including capital standards, accounting rules, the designation of Globally Systemically Important Insurers and group-wide supervision,” Zielezienski said. “The stakes are high and we must all be pulling in the same direction to get it right.”

    Franklin Nutter, president of the Reinsurance Association of America, said the FIO has taken positive steps in its effort to develop covered agreements with other countries to find more efficient ways to regulate reinsurers doing business from outside the United States. The FIO is currently working with Treasury Secretary Jacob “Jack” Lew and the U.S. Trade Representative to develop covered agreements. “Once achieved, these covered agreements will facilitate reinsurance transactions to support economic activity and recovery in the U.S. as well as in foreign countries,” Nutter said.

    Jon Jensen, chairman of government affairs for the Independent Insurance Agents and brokers of America, said his organization largely agrees with the FIO report that insurance regulation could be improved and modernized in certain areas, but that any federal action should be targeted and limited with day-to-day regulation left in the hands of state officials.

    “The report recommends the use of targeted and limited federal intervention to address problems that the states are unable to resolve on their own,” Jensen said. “The report notes that federal action of this kind should be limited to those instances where demonstrated deficiencies exist, where there is a national interest in addressing a particular problem, and where state officials are unable — as a result of practical hurdles or collective action challenges — to resolve the challenges themselves.”

    Also testifying were:

    — Anthony Cimino, interim head of government affairs and vice president for insurance and trade for the Financial Services Roundtable.

    — Paul Ehlert, president of Germania Farm Mutual Insurance Association, on behalf of the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies.

    — Gary Hughes, executive vice president and general counsel for the American Council of Life Insurers.

    — Scott Sinder, a partner at Steptoe & Johnson, on behalf of the Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers.

    During the portion of the hearing dedicated to McRaith’s testimony, the FIO director said the federal government may be able to promote greater uniformity among the states in some aspects of insurance regulation (Best’s News Service, Dec. 12, 2014).

    The former Illinois insurance commissioner cited producer licensing, product approval, reinsurance captives and mortgage insurance as areas where state regulators have failed to bring their regulations in line with one another, despite years of complaints from the industry about inefficiencies in the oversight process. However, McRaith’s support of an expanded federal role in some aspects of the industry was met with criticism from some lawmakers on the panel, who argued the state-led system has proven itself to be capable of handling even the worst financial crises, like the one seen in 2008.

    (By Jeff Jeffrey, Washington Bureau manager: jeff.jeffrey@ambest.com)

    Originally Posted at A.M. Best on February 5, 2014 by Jeff Jeffrey, Washington Bureau manager: jeff.jeffrey@ambest.com.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency