2014 Electronic communications compliance report: What you need to know as a financial advisor
June 26, 2014 by Amy McIlwain
Smarsh, a cloud-based archiving solution for financial advisors, recently released their annual Electronic Compliance Survey Report. In its fourth year, the Smarsh survey seeks to identify trends and concerns in financial services.This year’s results reinforce the shift in attitude toward an acceptance of more types of electronic messages (and the compliance ramifications).
In 2013, failure to meet electronic messaging compliance obligations was the number one source of FINRA fines. Noncompliance is an increasingly expensive proposition, increasing by 132 percent during the last survey period.
The SEC will target firms registered for more than three years that have not yet been examined. How can you prepare for exams? Here is what you need to know.
Navigating complexity: How does compliance keep pace?
The number of electronic messaging channels that firms allow employees to use for business purposes has nearly doubled in the past three years and compliance programs are not keeping pace. From email to instant messaging, social media and more, the number of message types archived has nearly doubled in three years from 2.2 to 4.2; however, there is still a large gap between messaging types in use and those being archived.
LinkedIn continues to be the most highly requested electronic messaging platform, followed by instant messaging, text/SMS messaging and Twitter. Compliance officers expect resources devoted to the oversight of electronic communications to have little change in the next year, so with more communications to manage but little resources to do so, compliance pros are looking to technology to help them gain efficiencies.”Don’t ignore text messaging
Often a casual communication method between friends and family, text/SMS messaging is becoming prolific in the financial services world. Investors want to text their advisors from their mobile phone, in fact more than 39 percent already to so. Despite the widespread availability of text messaging, however, it is not receiving the same level of attention from compliance departments as email or social media. Over two-thirds of firms that allow text messaging do not have a solution in place for retention and oversight.The lack of attention to text/SMS messaging exposes firms to risks, especially with the wide adoption of mobile devices by advisors. As firms begin to leverage more sophisticated technology, the next evolution in supervision will enable firms to correlate data so that text message conversations will become a critical element of risk-based surveillance.
RIAs need to be prepared
More than half of RIAs (53 percent) are concerned about their ability to produce data upon request, compared to 29 percent of BDs. When asked about their concerns related to exams, BDs and RIAs both indicated their largest concern is increased scrutiny/enforcement by regulators. However, RIAs have had less rigorous supervision requirements under the Investment Advisor Act of 1940.The SEC accounted an initiative to increase the number of exams in 2014, targeting 2,200 registered firms that have never faced an SEC exam. These exams will focus on compliance programs, filings and disclosures, marketing, portfolio management and safekeeping of client assets. For both RIA and BD firms not subjected to a recent exam, it is helpful to understand the experience of firms examined in the last year.The top message types requested are:
- Website pages
- Instant messages
- Bloomberg or Reuters messages
- Social media
- Email marketing
- Text/SMS messages
