We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • ACLI Chief: Regulators Should Keep Consumers in Mind When Setting New Rules

    October 23, 2014 by Jeff Jeffrey

    As the federal government and international regulators move forward with efforts to enact new rules for the insurance industry, they should not “lose sight of” the reason rules are implemented in the first place — to help the consumer, said American Council of Life Insurers President and Chief Executive Officer Dirk Kempthorne.

    During ACLI’s annual conference in Washington, D.C., Kempthorne talked to Best’s News Service about the Federal Reserve’s new role as an insurance regulator, the prospect of new capital standards being implemented and what the November election might mean for the industry.

    Q: What are you hearing from your members here at ACLI’s annual conference?

    A: When you consider the American Council of Life Insurers, this state-based industry, when you take those member companies that are designated as [systemically important financial institutions], those that are deemed to be internationally active insurance groups, those that may have a thrift — we’re at about 60% of our premium volume that is now regulated beyond state regulation. And so, what are the ramifications of that, what are the implications of that?

    One of the things we stress in all of these meetings is let’s please not lose sight of why all of this takes place. It’s to help people, the consumer. I have appreciated hearing from CEOs over the last two days, saying, “We need to find ways to simplify this.”

    We really do need to find that, and how do you couple technology with that as well?

    Q: You mentioned talking to CEOs. There was a panel this morning where regulation was a big topic. What jumped out at you from that panel?

    A:You heard from them, one being a reinsurer, one being a SIFI, one being one of the major providers of long-term care, so you see the mix that is here, and yet you see the common themes of, with regards to capital standards, let’s get them right. With regards to regulation, let’s not forget why we’re doing this, for the people.

    Q: The ACLI conference is happening at the same time as the conference being held by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors in Amsterdam. What do you think about the regulatory developments on the international stage in combination with new federal regulations?

    A: It’s interesting. [The IAIS] is now removing what was called “observer status.” So in a world of transparency, they now want to have not as many people in the rooms. So we need to determine what is the best means by which we can continue to communicate, educate, collaborate with these regulators, so that we do not get unintended consequences…We ought to get this right. There are so many steps necessary to get there.

    Also throw into this mix that you have the G-20 that created the Financial Stability Board, which now is saying to the IAIS, “We want you to come up with a variety of things, whether it’s capital standards, group supervision, whatever the case may be.” I think sometimes the IAIS is now borrowing that name of FSB and saying, “In the name of FSB, we must do this.”

    Q: You talked about the level of transparency at the IAIS. But transparency has also been an issue at the Financial Stability Oversight Council. What do you think about all the conversations that are so important to the industry and to the consumers that are taking place in what the industry has said is a closed-door fashion?

    A: Let’s take a look at some of the entities that are involved, such as the Fed. The Fed, which now has this new responsibility to regulate those systemically important financial institutions, the SIFIs. We recently met with Fed Governor [Daniel] Tarullo. I had met with him prior to that. But in the second meeting, we included six of our CEO member companies. The Fed, to their credit, said, “We regulate banks. This idea of regulating insurance institutions is new.” And so from that meeting, we now have established work sessions.

    Along with that, we need to get a correction to what has been called the Collins Amendment, which again has unintended consequences. But the Fed attorneys determined that the language that Sen. [Susan] Collins put in now requires the Fed to have the same bank standards on life insurance. It doesn’t work. The Fed has said so. Treasury has said so. We finally got it out of the Senate, in a very partisan atmosphere on Capitol Hill, we got it out of the Senate 100 to 0 on a unanimous consent request. We have 219 co-sponsors in the House. I think we’ll get the solution, ultimately. But the Fed has said, “We need that so we can demonstrate that there is absolutely a difference between a bank and a life insurance company.” That will help them in that FSOC role.

    While we may not be able to be in on all of the FSOC meetings, those members we can have discussions, work sessions.

    Q: Finally, we have an election coming up. There is the possibility of flipping the Senate. Some have said that if the Senate flips, it could change the calculus for a lot of the industry’s priorities. What are your thoughts?

    A: Retirement security, financial well-being of citizens, really is not a partisan issue. You look back at Sen. Rob Portman, [Ohio-Republican] what he’s done. And you look at a variety of things that have been bipartisan in their nature, we think that we can find bipartisanship. We meet with both sides.

    And who knows what will happen, whether the Republicans will take the Senate? If they do, again we’re going to be there. We’re going to be talking with them about solutions for the future. But, Jeff, as you know, the next thing they’ll say is, “The election is over. But the presidential race is now starting.” So is that another two years that we write off as gridlock? In the meantime, people are continuing to age. They still have their needs. So you need to have a vibrant, robust industry. That’s what we’re about.

    Originally Posted at A.M. Best on October 22, 2014 by Jeff Jeffrey.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency