We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • SEC Putting Retirement Savings On The Front Burner In 2015

    January 19, 2015 by Linda Koco, linda.koco@innfeedback.com

    The examinations office of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is putting retirement savings on the front burner for 2015.

    In its annual priority list for examinations, the SEC Office of Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) named matters “of importance to retail investors and investors saving for retirement” as its top priority for exams of registered investment advisors (RIAs).

    OCIE’s scrutiny in this area will include “whether the information, advice, products and services being offered is consistent with applicable laws, rules and regulations.”

    The office named other priorities too. For example, “assessing issues related to market-wide risk” was second on the 2015 priority list, and identification and examination of registrants “that may be engaged in illegal activity” was third.

    The first priority

    But it is the first priority — retail retirement matters — that may draw the attention of RIAs and those who work with them. That is because retirement products and plans represent a growing portion of RIA business.

    OCIE indicated that the registered entities it examines include RIAs, investment companies, broker/dealers, clearing agencies, municipal advisors, transfer agents, exchanges and self-regulatory organizations. (Priorities for exams of the last two appear in another document.)

    Insurance and financial professionals who do not come under this purview may want to stay abreast of issues the OCIE is spotlighting anyhow. That is because federal and state regulators do communicate with one another on matters of mutual interest and concern, so regulatory thinking spreads.

    In general, the SEC office noted that it is planning various examination initiatives to assess risks to retail investors that can arise from recent retirement trends such as:
    •Offers to retail investors of new products and services that were formerly characterized as alternative or institutional. Examples include private funds, illiquid investments, and structured products intended to generate higher yields in a low-interest rate environment.
    •Offers to retail investors of information, advice, products, and services that help them plan for, and live in, the retirement years. The OCIE identified these offers as coming from the “financial services industry,” but does not indicate any particular wing of the industry.

    As for specific areas of retirement focus, the office lists six “trends” it is watching. These are: Fee selection and reverse churning, sales practices, suitability, branch offices, alternative investment companies, and fixed income investment companies. The first three are of particular interest to insurance and financial advisors.

    Fees

    “Financial professionals serving retail investors are increasingly choosing to operate as an investment advisor or as a dually registered investment advisor/broker-dealer, rather than solely as a broker-dealer,” OCIE said. The fee structures for these advisors can vary from fees based on assets under management, hourly fees, performance-based fees, wrap fees and unified fees, it said.

    So, when an advisor offers a variety of structures, “we will focus on recommendations of account types and whether they are in the best interest of the client at the inception of the arrangement and thereafter,” OCIE said.

    This focus will include “fees charged, services provided and disclosures made about such relationships.”

    The fee structures used at the retail level have been a matter of growing interest and concern to the SEC. In December, the SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy issued an “Investor Bulletin” alerting investors to the “miscellaneous fees” that some brokers have been charging.

    These can range from postage and handling charges, administrative service fees, clearing and transfer fees, execution facility fees, and others. “It is a good idea to pay attention not only to the commissions your broker charges, but to other fees as well.” the bulletin said.

    Ten months earlier, in February, the same office issued an “Investor Bulletin” on how fees and expenses affect investment portfolios. The document urged investors to “look at your account opening documents, account statements, confirmations and any product-specific documents to see the types and amount of fees you are paying. Fees impact your investment, so it’s important you understand them.”

    The February bulletin gives examples of transaction and ongoing fees to check out. “Transaction fees” include commissions, markups, sales loads, surrender charges, it said. “Ongoing fees” include investment advisory fees, annual operating expenses, 401(k) fees, and annual variable annuity fees.

    These bulletins gain context from remarks that OCIE Director Andrew J. Bowden made in a speech he gave last March. He said his office has been looking at “the trend among dually registered firms to move their clients’ assets from commission-based brokerage accounts to fee-based wrap accounts that offer advice and no-commission trading for one bundled asset-based fee.”

    The move into fee-based wrap accounts has become “a widespread practice,” he told the Investment Adviser Association Compliance Conference in Arlington, Va., according to published remarks appearing on the SEC website.

    “A lot of people have jumped into the pool. We fear that the rationalization that ‘everyone is doing it’ may be adversely affecting people’s thinking about how some of these arrangements are in the best interest of their clients.”

    The stakes for investors and advisors are high, he added. So is “the risk that the gold coins are clouding their vision.”

    Sales Practices

    Concerning sales practices in the retirement area, the OCIE’s priority list says the SEC office will be assessing whether registrants are using “improper or misleading practices” in rollovers. Specifically, the focus will be on practices “when recommending the movement of retirement assets from employer-sponsored defined contribution plans into other investments and accounts, especially when they pose greater risks and/or charge higher fees.”

    Suitability

    Here, the OCIE plans to will evaluate registered entities’ recommendations or determinations to invest retirement assets into complex or structured products and higher yield securities. This will include “whether the due diligence conducted, the disclosures made and the suitability of the recommendations or determinations are consistent with existing legal requirements.”

    The focus is on the retail level

    The three “trend” areas mentioned previously, and the three others (branch offices, alternative investment companies and fixed income investment companies) involve retirement matters at the retail investor level in some fashion.

    By way of comparison, in 2014, OCIE named “fraud detection and prevention” as its top priority. Retirement-related matters did show up on OCIE’s exam priority list last year, but they ranked in sixth place. The retirement focus then was on “retirement vehicles and rollovers.” For example, the office said it would examine “the sales practices of investment advisors targeting retirement-age workers to roll over their employer-sponsored 401(k) plan into higher cost investments.”

    How the heightened focus on retirement in 2015 will impact the retail retirement marketplace remains to be seen. But the fact that the subject is now at the top of the OCIE exam priority list suggests the industry will heighten its own focus too.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on January 16, 2015 by Linda Koco, linda.koco@innfeedback.com.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency