We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • As more states recognize gay marriage, planning traps still await couples

    January 27, 2015 by Liz Skinner

    Supreme Court could agree to rule on one of many appeals cases by this summer, and largely clear things up

    Retirement and other financial planning is still a mine-field for many same-sex couples, especially those living in the 14 states that continue to bar gay couples from wedding.

    Even as the legalization of same-sex marriages has swept across the United States in the 19 months since the Supreme Court largely proclaimed the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional, the state and federal agencies that oversee taxes, employee benefits and Social Security are applying their own rules in providing benefits — and they’re not consistent with each other.

    “There’s still a lot of complexity and traps for the unwary,” said Robert Fishbein, vice president and corporate counsel for Prudential Financial, at a Capitol Hill briefing Wednesday. “And it’s changing every day.”
    In fact, a game-changing decision could be initiated as early as Friday.

    The Supreme Court will decide in the next week or so, possibly Friday, whether to hear arguments in any of the appeals cases that involve same-sex marriage. A Michigan case where two female nurses are fighting that state’s ban is thought the most likely to be considered by the high court, Mr. Fishbein said.

    Adding even more uncertainty, a federal judge on Thursday ruled that Michigan has to recognize the 300 same-sex marriages that were performed in that state on the one day gay marriage was legal last year. The following day a federal appeals court stayed the court decision that had overturned the Michigan ban on same-sex marriage.

    An ultimate Supreme Court decision that declares the unconstitutionality of state same-sex marriage bans would eliminate much of the complexity in financial planning for same-sex couples and families. Such a decision would not be handed down by the justices before this summer.

    “A decision could be a global resolution that would give a common approach for taxes, Social Security and other benefits,” Mr. Fishbein said.

    The justices also could wait to review the cases until their next term, which begins in early October. The court hears oral arguments in about 75 to 80 cases a year, a small portion of the 10,000 petitions it receives each year.

    Last October, the Supreme Court denied review of all the cases it had been asked to consider that struck down gay marriage bans, thus allowing same-sex marriage in those states and others that are bound by the decisions of those circuit courts.

    To date, 36 states and Washington, D.C. allow same-sex marriages, and thus residents there have the federal benefits and responsibilities of all married couples. They represent about 70% of the nation’s population.

    The 14 states that still ban same-sex couples from marrying are: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee and Texas.

    The biggest challenge in retirement planning today is a result of the Social Security Administration only recognizing marriages among couples who live in a state that allows such unions, regardless of the state the couple may have been married in, said Aaron Tax, director of federal government relations for services and advocacy for GLBT Elders (SAGE).

    Therefore, couples in those 14 states are not eligible for spousal and survivor benefits from Social Security, and lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgender older Americans are among those who need them most, Mr. Tax said.

    Older LGBT men and women are twice as likely to be single and four times as likely to be childless, compared to the average older American, he said.

    The Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Treasury, which oversee federal income taxes and individual retirement accounts, have said those in legal same-sex marriages will receive equal treatment as those in heterosexual marriages, no matter which state they live in. However, couples living in the 14 states without gay marriage rights may still have to file state income taxes as single.

    Couples can also amend previous year federal income tax returns, but before doing so should evaluate whether their salary together will push them into a higher tax bracket and thus result in more taxes being owed, Mr. Fishbein said.

    The Department of Labor, which enforces most of the nation’s retirement plan laws, has said the state in which a couple resides or where the employer is based does not matter; its rules recognize spousal benefits for same-sex couples. It’s unclear, however, how such benefits should be handled for transactions that occurred before the June 2013 Supreme Court ruling on DOMA, Mr. Fishbein said.

    Jodee Winterhof, vice president of policy and political affairs for the Human Rights Campaign, said the nation needs comprehensive legislation from Congress that would “close the gap between what couples have in different states.”

    She said she’s optimistic some portions of a measure could even move during the current Congress, which began a two-year session last week.

    “The uncertainty is the biggest problem,” Ms. Winterhof said. “People are asking, ‘When will this change in my state?’ and that’s a stress for people as far as what they may be able to do in planning for retirement or death.”

    Originally Posted at InvestmentNews on January 21, 2015 by Liz Skinner.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency