We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • DOL Secretary Questioned Over Proposed Fiduciary Duty Rule

    July 22, 2015 by Frank Klimko

    Lawmakers questioned U.S. Department of Labor Secretary Thomas Perez over the possible unintended consequences of a proposed rule that would extend conflict of interest fiduciary duty requirements to brokers and dealers — including those who provide consumer retirement advice.

    U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., chairman of the Senate Labor subcommittee on Employment and Workplace Safety, said the proposed rule could make it harder to deliver the retirement advice that many Americans need.

    “The new rules would most limit the access to the advice for those people that need it most,” Isakson said. “I think this is a solution in search of a problem. We have heard that one-third of personal advisers would have to leave the business because of the rule.”

    Perez said the rule changes advances retirement security and preserves consumers’ choice on how to plan for retirement, invest their savings and meet their financial goals.

    “The rule is about putting the best interest of consumer first when they are getting help in retirement,” Perez said. “Some assume that this rule already exists, but there is no rule to that.”

    Because the department has been flooded with comments on the proposed rule, it will extend the comment period and hold three days of public hearings next month to address concerns about how it is written, Perez said. The department is working to make amendments to the rule and is open to advice, particularly from industry groups, Perez said.

    “The majority of folks are trying to do good things in this space,” Perez said. “Our goal is to align the best interest of the customers with those of advisers and firms. This is about guard rails and not strait jackets.”

    Industry groups and trade associations expressed dismay with the proposed rule. The Americans for Annuity Protection this week launched a grass-roots campaign for brokers and dealers to derail it (Best’s News Service, July 20, 2015).

    And, the American Council of Life Insurers said the issuance and sale of variable annuities is already regulated more comprehensively than most financial products for retirement through a network of state and federal laws and mandates.

    “Variable annuities are highly regulated products, uniquely providing consumers with guaranteed lifetime income,” Gary Hughes, ACLI executive vice president and general counsel, said in a public comment to the DOL. “For many, this product constitutes an important component of their retirement portfolio.”

    The National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors was cool to the proposed rule, which it said needed more work.

    “In its current form, the proposed rule presents major — and in some cases insurmountable — obstacles for NAIFA members serving middle-market retail investors,” NAIFA wrote in its comments to DOL. “NAIFA does not oppose a ‘best interest’ fiduciary standard for its members. However, any new standard must be operationalized in a fashion that is workable for Main Street advisers and their clients.”

    The fiduciary-duty rule was first proposed, and then withdrawn by DOL in 2010. It was published this year in the Federal Register on April 20. The DOL and the Securities and Exchange Commission are proposing the changes as a way to protect workers and retirees against receiving conflicted investment advice.

    Supporters of the rule change note that the retirement landscape is much different today than it was when the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 was enacted. Over the past few decades, there has been a major shift from defined benefit plans to defined contribution plans in the private sector. Most 401(k) and IRA account balances are modest, and rising life expectancy and health care costs can mean that retirees could outlive their retirement savings, New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli said in a public submission to DOL.

    Originally Posted at AM Best on July 21, 2015 by Frank Klimko.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency