We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • MetLife CEO: Adviser Network Sale, Possible US Retail Spinoff Still on Despite SIFI Victory

    April 28, 2016 by Frank KIimko

    NEW YORK – MetLife Inc. will still sell its adviser network and either spinoff, sell or seek a public offering of its U.S. retail unit as part of a strategy to increase profitability, despite earning a victory in its fight to shed its systemically important financial institution designation, Chief Executive Officer Steve Kandarian said in his annual shareholders letter.

    “When we announced our decision to seek judicial review of FSOC’s (Financial Stability Oversight Council) decision, there were many who said we had little chance of winning,” said Kandarian. “But we believed strongly that FSOC’s designation was ‘arbitrary and capricious’.”

    Kandarian was referring to a federal court decision unsealed earlier this month. A judge rescinded the systemically important financial institution designation for the largest U.S. insurer, agreeing with MetLife’s arguments it was arbitrarily singled out for enhanced prudential supervision (Best’s News Service, April 19, 2016).

    Although the legal victory was significant, Kandarian said the company intended to follow through on two important downsizing moves — announced before the ruling — that will allow it to focus on profit making for investors. MetLife agreed in February to sell a distribution network of about 4,000 advisers to Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. and will continue to seek a spinoff, sale or public offering of a U.S. retail unit (Best’s News Service, Feb. 25, 2016).

    “The prospect of U.S. retail being part of a SIFI was a significant factor in the planned separation given that higher capital requirements would have made it difficult to price our products competitively,” Kandarian said. “While we are pleased that the (federal) district court has removed the SIFI designation from the entire company, the reasons for pursuing the U.S. retail separation have not changed.”

    An independent new company would have greater focus, enjoy more flexibility in products and operations, and avoid the potential for increased regulatory burdens, he said. And, the separation should also bring significant benefits to MetLife as the company shifts toward businesses with lower capital requirements and greater cash generation potential.

    “While the separated business would be largely a pure-play retail life and annuity manufacturer,” Kandarian said, “we believe MetLife would appeal to those who favor more predictable and rising free cash flow.”

    Generating more free cash flow is an overarching company mission, Kandarian said.

    “We are willing to part with a business that represents approximately 20% of operating earnings because, as part of MetLife, it could not generate the level and predictability of free cash flow that we demand,” Kandarian said. “We cannot yet provide a specific target for MetLife’s free-cash-flow ratio post-separation, but we have said it should be better than the 55%-to-65% target we provided to investors in December 2015.”

    On the lawsuit, the U.S. Treasury Department has said it will appeal the ruling and Treasury Secretary Jacob “Jack” Lew recently penned an opinion article in the Wall Street Journal defending the work of FSOC.

    “Opponents of financial reform are cheering a court decision to rescind the Financial Stability Oversight Council’s designation of MetLife for heightened regulatory supervision,” Lew wrote. “Leaving aside whether the decision will be overruled on appeal, efforts to depict the court’s decision as a positive for our financial system are mistaken and dangerously ignore the lessons of the financial crisis.”

    It is the only SIFI designee to bring such a legal challenge. The other insurance companies so designated are American International Group Inc. and Prudential Financial Inc.

    Operating units of MetLife have current Best’s Financial Strength Ratings of either A (Excellent) or A+ (Superior).

    Midday April 26, shares of MetLife Inc. (NYSE: MET) were trading at $46.80, up 1.21% from the previous close.

    (By Frank Klimko, Washington correspondent, BestWeek: Frank.Klimko@ambest.com)

    BN-NJ-4-26-2016 1154 ET #

    Originally Posted at AM Best on April 26, 2017 by Frank KIimko.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency