We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • The Next Generation of Life Insurance

    April 26, 2016 by Frank Chechel, FSA

    Whole Life or Indexed UL… Why not ask Coke or Pepsi?

    Whole Life or Indexed Universal Life? That is one of the first questions that comes to mind when I think about the life insurance marketplace in 2015.

    Let me explain why. Whole Life continues to be the top selling life insurance product by premium, as it has been for many years. However, Indexed UL has experienced explosive sales growth since the 2008 financial crisis and now stands as the next most popular life insurance product after Whole Life1.

    Both products are generally sold for death benefit protection today with potential for cash value accumulation and retirement income down the road. Whole Life touts robust death benefit, premium and cash value guarantees along with steady dividend2 performance, while Indexed UL touts equity linked upside performance combined with some level of downside protection.

    Both products resonate

    As the sales numbers demonstrate, both products resonate with a broad cross-section of insurance consumers. However, despite the overwhelming popularity of both products, I have rarely met an insurance agent that sells both product types.

    Agents generally live in one camp or the other, presenting only Whole LIfe or only Indexed UL to the vast majority of their clients. Asking the question “Whole Life or Indexed UL” to an agent in 2015 amounts to asking them whether they like “Coke or Pepsi”.

    But why do agents, and ultimately clients, need to settle for either/or? Isn’t there a way for carriers to offer agents and clients a better solution, combining the best of both worlds?

    Interestingly, carriers have been experimenting with this notion for some time, going back to the 1990’s. Generally, the concept has been to create a new variation of Whole Life paid-up additions (PUA’s).3 The dividend performance of traditional PUA’s would be replaced by the performance of the S&P 500 or another popular equity market index.

    At least one carrier developed a “variable paid- up addition” for their Whole Life contract in the late 1990’s, tying the cash value performance of the variable PUA to the movement of the S&P 500 equity index. Unfortunately, sales of this product were hampered by the “dot com bust” and the unlimited downside risk inherent with this design.

    But why do agents, and ultimately clients, need to settle for either/or? Isn’t there a way for carriers to offer agents and clients a better solution, combining the best of both worlds?

    Oftentimes, an innovation fails or succeeds, not based on the idea itself, but based on entering the marketplace at the appropriate time. As consumers, agents and carriers emerge from the 2008 crisis and have become familiar with the concept of “indexed” insurance products, we believe that now may be the perfect time to reimagine a new type of WL PUA – an “indexed PUA”.

    This innovation would work as follows:

    • Indexed PUA’s would receive a positive or negative adjustment to the traditional dividend based on the performance of the S&P 500 index, subject to a cap and floor.
    • This adjustment would only be available on PUA’s, thus ensuring that the base Whole Life policy guarantees4 are not impacted by equity market volatility.
    • Clients would have the ability to adjust their allocation between traditional and indexed PUA’s over time as their needs change.

    To be fair, this solution may not necessarily work for all clients. There will be many clients that will still prefer a traditional WL product or traditional Indexed UL.

    However, given the significant size of the Whole Life and Indexed UL marketplaces, we believe the time is ripe for carriers and agents to begin offering a “best of both worlds” indexed PUA solution to their clients. This concept could be attractive to many of today’s insurance buyers, providing attractive Whole Life guarantees along with the opportunity for index linked upside potential.

     

     

     

    1 Based on 2014 LIMRA life insurance sales data.

    2Dividends are not guaranteed. They are declared annually by Guardian’s Board of Directors.

    3Paid-up Additions (PUA) are purchases of additional insurance (death benefit) that have a cash value. These purchases are made with dividends and/or a rider that allows the policyholder to pay an additional premium over and above the base premium. This creates the growth of death benefit and cash values in a participating whole life policy. Adding large amounts of paid-up additions may create a Modified Endowment Contract (MEC). A MEC is a type of life insurance contract that is subject to last-in-first-out (LIFO) ordinary income tax treatment, similar to distributions from an annuity. The distribution may also be subject to a 10% federal tax penalty on the gain portion of the policy if the owner is under age 59 ½. The death benefit is generally income tax free.
    4All whole life insurance policy guarantees are subject to the timely payment of all required premiums and the claims paying ability of the issuing insurance company. Policy loans and withdrawals affect the guarantees by reducing the policy’s death benefit and cash values.
    2015-14412 Exp. 11/17

     

    Mr. Chechel is a 2nd Vice President at The Guardian Life Insurance Company, leading the Individual Life Product Management team. This team’s responsibilities include life product strategy, competitive intelligence, new product development and life product support. Visit guardianlife.com

    Originally Posted at Advisor Magazine on April 20, 2016 by Frank Chechel, FSA.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency