We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • DOL Rule May — Or May Not — Be Cause Of Drastic VA Sales Drop

    September 14, 2016 by Ben Mattlin

    In the first half of 2016, overall sales of variable annuities slumped 22 percent to $53.5 billion, the lowest total since 1998. This marks the first time VA sales have amounted to less than $30 billion in two consecutive quarters since 2002.

    This, in part, led LIMRA to some pessimistic projections. For all of 2016, the insurance industry institute predicted in mid-August, VA sales would show a decline of between 15 percent and 20 percent compared to 2015 levels — and drop another 25 percent to 30 percent next year.  

    More startling still, perhaps, it forecast an about-face in fixed indexed annuity sales, often seen as a direct beneficiary of declining VA sales. Indexed annuity sales may be expected to grow between 15 percent and 25 percent this year over last, marking the ninth consecutive year of sales growth, but they’re anticipated to plunge 30 percent to 35 percent next year. Some think fixed index annuities are benefiting from the same appeal as structured notes, implicit guarantees.

    What lies behind these dreary sales predictions? The simple answer is the new DOL fiduciary standard, which will render both VAs and indexed annuities subject to the Best Interest Contract Exemption guaranteeing full disclosure of fees and other terms. This could have a chilling effect on VAs and their closest competitors in the annuities world, indexed annuities. But is that explanation too simple?

    One industry expert who spoke on condition of anonymity thinks there are more factors at work. “It’s a perfect storm. The market is having its second-longest bull run in history, which has made people overly confident. They no longer think they need the downside protection that VAs offer,” he said. Continued low interest rates are also a contributing factor, because they keep people in the market, buoying share prices. “The bang for the buck that you can get from any type of protection is less attractive than it was in a higher interest rate environment.”

    This isn’t necessarily prudent, however. A market correction of at least 20 percent is a near certainty, though no one can say exactly when, and a variable annuity can be one of the best ways for retirees to protect some of their assets from such a downturn. But, this analyst observed, it can be difficult to convince someone to fix a hole in the roof if it hasn’t rained in six months. People generally take action after the fact, when it’s already too late.

    Yet it’s also true that the DOL ruling has unnerved many retirees and advisors alike. To avoid regulatory hurdles and potential lawsuits, providers are erring on the side of caution — limiting new product innovations and, in some cases, limiting availability.  This is ironic, since the new fiduciary standard was intended to increase confidence in retirement products. Some even expected a jump in VA sales as a result. But so far at least, it seems many purveyors of VAs plan to avoid the liability risk.

    Another result of increased fiduciary scrutiny is the termination of many L-share VAs.  L-shares are the type that come with short surrender periods, meaning they can be sold without penalty after, say, four years as opposed to the typical B-share’s seven-year waiting period.  In return, L-shares charge higher fees and an ongoing, trailing commission to brokers. Regulators had already expressed concern about these fees not being fully disclosed or in clients’ best interests. Last February, before the new DOL rules were issued, Commonwealth Financial Network announced it would stop selling L-share VAs.  Then, in August, both Jackson National Life Insurance Co. and Pruco Life Insurance Co., an annuity unit of Prudential Financial, eliminated the share class.

    On the other hand, VAs with a level fee structure — essentially paying the advisor, the broker-dealer, and all affiliates the same rate (as long as there are no third-party payments for, say, recommendations) — may be on the rise. They aren’t new, but they have the benefit of effectively neutralizing potential conflicts of interest and so are more likely to pass muster with the fiduciary authorities. “I wish we could have more gravitation toward levelized compensation,” mused the anonymous advisor, explaining that if the same percentage were charged across all products, clients would know that their advisors are only recommending what they truly think is best, not what pays the highest or quickest compensation.

    With all this change in the VA market following the DOL ruling, it’s surprising that one recent study found that two-thirds of advisors believe the new regulatory standard won’t have any impact — positive or negative — on the use of variable annuities.

    Originally Posted at Financial Advisor on September 14, 2016 by Ben Mattlin.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency