We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • When it comes to annuities, why words matter

    December 7, 2016 by N/A

    Annuities continue to be misunderstood, oversold, and actually needed by the demographic tidal wave of baby boomers wanting contractually guaranteed solutions. Using just the word “annuity” to describe a category of many unique products is a semantic travesty.

    The professor knows

    Bo Knows according to Nike. John Knows when it comes to annuities. I am referring to my colleague, John Olsen, as the industry’s “annuity professor” and involuntary ombudsman for all things in the annuity world. His books and commentary should be must reads for both consumers and agents alike. I recently had a conversation with John, and his poignant comments on how annuities should be presented and described was both simple and efficient. Because there as so many types, John demands that you should use more than just the word “annuity” to describe the vast array of products available. According to John, when you use the word annuity, you need to add one to three additional words to describe the specific strategy.

    Below are some specific annuity product descriptions that John is referring to, and the reason that is misleading and incomplete to use only the word “annuity.”

    • Single Premium Immediate Annuity
    • Deferred-Income Annuity
    • Qualify Longevity Annuity Contract
    • Multi-Year Guarantee Annuity
    • Fixed-Index Annuity
    • Variable Annuity
    • Charitable Gift Annuity

    Most of these product names are self-explanatory from how the specific strategy works. For example, a Single Premium Immediate Annuity provides income now based on your life expectancy for an up-front lump sum provided to the carrier. Using just the word “annuity” is not sufficient. That’s like saying “restaurant” for all eating establishments. What kind of restaurant? Annuity? What kind of annuity?

    “I hate all annuities” is an intellectually lazy statement

    This popular knee-jerk comment is a good marketing strategy if you are trying to convert annuity assets to a fee-based platform and is an easy response for advisers not interested recommending specific annuity types in lieu of their master of the universe market growth strategies. Hating all annuities is like hating all restaurants or all mutual funds. Some are good, some are bad, but not all are bad.

    Annuities are contracts and transfer-of-risk strategies that solve for four primary solutions; lifetime income, principal protection, legacy, confinement care/LTC. If you do not need to contractually solve for one or more of those goals, then you do not need an annuity. It’s that simple.

    Looking for annuity-industry leadership please

    A quick solution for the fractured annuity industry is to hire John Olsen as the “CEO of Annuities” to oversee everything. Because that makes so much sense, it will never happen, so maybe the industry should start combating the misuse of the word “annuity” to inappropriately describe all the different strategies available.

    As I continue to wear my “Got Guarantees” T-shirt, the annuity industry also needs to embrace the contractual guarantees message and transfer of risk benefits that these different annuity types provide. Regardless of the sales pitch, annuities are not pure market growth products. Never have been, and never will be. The focus should be on contractual guarantees in my opinion. Annuities are not investments. They are contracts.

    DOL messaging opportunity

    With Trump’s surprising win, the annuity industry (especially indexed annuity promoters) seems to be prematurely celebrating the possible demise of the Department of Labor’s (DOL) pending rule scheduled to be fully implemented in January of 2018. I hope that the annuity industry is too far down the road to return to the Wild West sales messaging that seemed to go unregulated and unchecked. There is an opportunity now for the bar to be raised across the board, and the industry to re-brand and re-frame the consumer message.

    The first step should be to educate and inform the consumer that using just the word “annuity” is a mistake, and that there are many types available that each have unique benefit propositions. Words matter when describing most financial product categories, and especially true when it comes to the diverse world of annuity products.

    Originally Posted at MarketWatch on December 6, 2016 by N/A.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency