We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • 5 questions still lingering on Trump’s fiduciary order

    February 6, 2017 by Andrew Welsch

    President Trump’s hotly anticipated action on the fiduciary rule landed with a bang, but it wasn’t quite what some anticipated (or feared). Here’s a breakdown of what the president did, and what may happen next.

    What actually happened?

    Trump signed a memorandum on Friday that instructs the Department of Labor to begin a review of the fiduciary rule.

    Has the fiduciary rule been delayed?

    Not yet. Trump’s memo did not explicitly order a delay, but the Labor Department issued a statement saying it would consider its legal options to do so in order to comply with the president’s instructions. The original implementation date is set for April 10.

    So what does Trump’s memorandum do?

    It lays down the rules for reversing the rule.

    Trump asked the Labor Department to evaluate whether the regulation would harm investors’ access to retirement products or advice; whether the rule would disrupt the financial advice industry; and whether it would cause an increase in litigation.

    If the department concludes the answer is yes to any of those questions, then the Labor Department is to start a new rule-making process to rescind and replace the fiduciary rule. It doesn’t specify what a new rule should be.

    Trump adds that one his administration’s priorities is to “empower Americans to make their own financial decisions,” and if the Labor Department finds the rule to be at odds with that goal, then it should rescind the rule.

    What’s the likelihood it will be overturned?

    The bar is set very low.

    “It appears that they could, for example, find that retirement savers still have access to advice, that costs are coming down, that quality of advice is going up, that firms are adapting to the rule, and that the rule is working as intended, but also find that the risk of litigation is rising and conclude that the rule needs to be reconsidered,” says Barbara Roper, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America.

    If the Labor Department does rescind the rule, then it will issue a new one and there will be a new comment period, similar to the one last year.

    Will the SEC now craft a fiduciary rule?

    It’s not likely.

    The agency has been authorized to craft a fiduciary rule under Dodd-Frank since 2010. But it’s failed to do so each year. Last year, former SEC Chair Mary Jo White blamed a lack of resources and consensus. Trump’s pick to replace her has yet to be confirmed — and the president has to appoint two additional commissioners to fill out the five seats.

     

    Further complicating matters, Trump has ordered a review of Dodd-Frank’s rules and Congressional Republicans are thinking about repealing the law. It’s not clear if the SEC’s mandate to craft a fiduciary regulation would remain.

    Moreover, Trump has signaled his administration’s goal is to remove regulations. Last week, he went so far as to sign an executive order instructing government departments and agencies that they must rescind two regulations for each new one introduced.

    In short, there’s still a lot left to be decided.

    Andrew Welsch is senior editor of On Wall Street.

    Originally Posted at Financial Planning on February 6, 2017 by Andrew Welsch.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency