We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Committee votes to keep states in charge of indexed annuities

    July 9, 2010 by Mark Schoeff Jr.

    SEC no longer in the picture; rarity: liberal Democrats line up with Republicans in vote

    By Mark Schoeff Jr.

    June 24, 2010 5:26 pm ET

    Legislation that would dramatically overhaul financial regulation will include a provision that maintains state regulation of equity-indexed annuities.

    House members of a House-Senate conference committee negotiating a final bill approved Thursday an amendment offered by Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, that was not part of either the House or Senate versions of the financial-reform bill. Senate conferees passed Mr. Harkin’s measure Tuesday.

    The proposal clarifies that the funds are insurance products that should be overseen by states rather than securities that should be regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    The SEC promulgated Rule 151A, which brings EIAs under its jurisdiction. But the agency delayed implementation because the regulation is the subject of a lawsuit filed by a consortium of insurance companies. The U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia sent the rule back to the SEC for further work.

    Supporters of the Harkin amendment argue that the SEC should not extend its reach to what they call an insurance product. EIAs are complex instruments that guarantee an income linked to a securities index.

    “States do an excellent job of regulating the insurance industry,” said Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala.

    Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of both the House Financial Services Committee and the House-Senate conference, opposed the Harkin proposal. In an unusual vote breakdown, most rank-and-file Democrats sided with most Republicans to approve the amendment over the objections of Democratic leaders.

    “This is not state versus federal,” Mr. Frank said. “This is investment products versus insurance products. The dual regulation is a better way to go.”

    Supporters of SEC oversight said that EIAs are vulnerable to abuse by unscrupulous salespeople who prey on vulnerable customers, such as elderly investors, who don’t have access to their money unless they pay huge penalties.

    “Stripping the SEC of the power to regulate equity-indexed annuities really undermines the intent of the financial-reform legislation,” said Kevin Keller, chief executive of the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. “We feel it’s a real loss for consumer protection.”

    Past problems with the annuities have been addressed by a suitability standard developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, according to Mr. Harkin. The model regulation requires that an agent selling the product obtain information about a customer’s age, income, financial experience, investment horizon and liquidity needs, among other factors.

    Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., countered that Mr. Harkin’s amendment short-circuits the appeals court, which said that the SEC could regulate annuities but failed to account for how its rule would affect market efficiency, competitiveness and capital formation.

    “The Harkin amendment would effectively trump the court’s decision,” Mr. Reed said Tuesday. “There have been repeated abuses of this product.”

    In the meeting of the conference Wednesday, Rep. Scott Garrett, R-N.J., defended the performance of the annuities.

    “No one has lost a penny of account value,” Mr. Garrett said.

    The economic slowdown also played a part in the conference debate on regulation of the annuities. Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., said that undermining state regulation could drive individual insurance salesmen and small insurance companies out of business, adding to unemployment rolls.

    “A lot of it’s about jobs,” Mr. Meeks said.

    Beyond the debate over who should regulate the products was a disagreement over whether the Harkin amendment was germane to the regulatory bill and should have been considered in the conference.

    “This is a major amendment of securities law without any hearings or debate,” Mr. Reed said. “I don’t think this is the proper place to make such a change.”

    Originally Posted at Investment News on June 24, 2010 by Mark Schoeff Jr..

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency