We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • SEC Presses for Better Disclosure on VA Living Benefits

    November 5, 2011 by Arthur D. Postal

    November 3, 2011 By Arthur D. Postal 

    WASHINGTON—The Securities and Exchange Commission is paying close attention to the disclosures related to variable annuities that contain living benefit features.

    These concerns include the disclosures related to VAs with a living benefit feature that use derivatives to enhance yields, about the “guarantees” included in these products, and about living benefit products that limit the investment options offered to purchasers.

    In comments today at an investment conference in Washington, a SEC official “encouraged” insurers and their lawyers to assess the effectiveness of disclosures in VAs that feature living benefits and use derivatives to enhance yields.

    Eileen Rominger, director of the SEC Invest Management Division said that this should include elimination of boilerplate disclosure that do not reflect the actual use of derivatives in a fund’s portfolio.

    If necessary, Rominger added, insurers should “improve your disclosure so that it more clearly reflects the actual role that derivatives play in the overall investment strategy of your funds.”

    Rominger made her comments at a Conference on Life Insurance Products sponsored by the American Law Institute/American Bar Association. The conference is being held in Washington.

    Rominger made clear that the SEC views living benefits, “even when offered as riders’, to be an integral part of the contract offering.”

    For that reason, Rominger said, insurers and their lawyers “should pay as much attention to disclosure concerning these benefits as you do to other features of a variable contract.”

    Another issue is that the SEC finds that a number of living benefit products limit the investment options offered to purchasers.

    “Indeed, purchasers of these optional benefits are facing increasing limitations on investment choices, reflecting an effort by insurers to limit volatility of the investments that are subject to the benefits,” Rominger said.

    For example, she said variable annuity contracts often prohibit allocations to the more volatile funds, or require participation in a conservative asset allocation model that is designed and maintained with reference to the insurer’s exposure under its living benefits.

    She said an important staff concern has been to ensure that investors are apprised of the trade-offs involved in such an arrangement.

    “I believe that prospectuses should make clear to investors purchasing the benefits that these investment restrictions may limit the upside potential of their investment, and that such restrictions also reduce the likelihood that the downside protection offered by these benefits will ever actually be ‘in the money’,” she said.

    Rominger also said that many insurers also control underlying investments by implementing asset allocation models that move account value among underlying funds pursuant to a formula.

    “Account allocations to equity funds, or to funds that may involve a higher level of volatility, are changed to more conservative investments, such as government bond funds or money market funds, during declining markets and, in some cases, moved back to the original fund allocation during periods of sustained market growth,” she said.

    As a disclosure matter, “I believe that it is important that any ability of an insurer unilaterally to change account allocations be clearly explained,” Rominger said.

    Similarly, the contract prospectus should make clear to investors the circumstances under which account allocations may be changed and the effects of such changes, such as the possibility of missing a market uptick during a period of fixed income allocations, she said.

    Regarding the tax-advantaged component of VAs, she said that “it is important that an investor purchasing a living benefit be fully informed of any aspect of the arrangement that could limit the market participation reasonably expected by the investor.”

    She also voiced concerns about the use of “guaranteed” in VAs that provide living benefits.

    She said that the term “guaranteed” as used in other contexts often connotes some level of support of an issuer’s obligations by a third-party guarantor.

    She said that as used in the variable products context, the term generally has been used to signify a promise by the insurer, the fulfillment of which is subject to the claims-paying ability of the insurer and is not backed by any third-party guarantor.

    For this reason, Rominger said that the SEC staff is concerned about potential confusion on the part of investors over the nature of so-called “guaranteed” benefits.

    “I would encourage you to review your disclosure to ensure that it makes clear the credit risk associated with any insurer obligation to pay a living benefit — or any other benefit — offered under a variable contract,” she said.

    Originally Posted at LifeHealthPro on November 3, 2011 by Arthur D. Postal.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency