We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Will the Proposed Fiduciary Rule for Advisors Crush IRA Holders?

    April 10, 2012 by Arthur D. Postal

    By Arthur D. Postal

    April 6, 2012 •

     

    A new report by a consulting firm paints a dire picture of the potential impact of a proposed rule establishing a fiduciary standard for investment advisors selling products to IRA holders.

    The study by management consulting firm Oliver Wyman  – “Assessment of the impact of the Department of Labor’s proposed “fiduciary” definition rule on IRA consumers” – says that if the rule proposed by the Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration is imposed, small investors interested in opening an IRA would have less access to investment professionals for guidance and support, making it less likely that they would open an IRA.

    The study also found that, under the proposed rule, many IRA holders would have reduced choice of investment professional, because over one-third of client-facing financial professionals in the industry would not be licensed to help retail investors with their IRA account needs.

    Another finding was that the brokerage IRA investors who could be served in an advisory model would likely face increased costs as a result of the rule-driven change.

    Other findings were that 18 million small IRA investors would lose access to their investment professional if a fiduciary standard was imposed.

    The study found that nearly one million fewer new IRAs would be opened each year; that small businesses could stop setting up new 401(k)s.

    The report estimated that the overall impact would the loss of $240 billion in lost retirement savings over the next 20 years.

    EBSA, which oversees ERISA, called for expanding the definition of “fiduciary” for retirement-plan purposes, in a rule proposed last year. However, it withdrew the rule last September under withering pressure from industry and members of Congress from both parties.

    EBSA officials requested access to the Oliver Wyman study as part of their efforts to include a comprehensive economic impact study as part of a revised proposed rule. They also asked other interested parties, including trade groups representing people who sold these products, to provide data as to possible economic impact of such a rule.

    The report was first prepared by Oliver Wyman last April at the request of 12 financial firms who have retained Davis & Harman, a Washington law firm, to represent their interests on the EBSA issue.

    Davis & Harman commissioned Oliver Wyman to do the study last April; it was revised and updated between January and April after EBSA officials asked for access to both the report and the data underlying it.

    The report and the underlying data used as the basis for the report was submitted late Thursday to EBSA and the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is also attempting to establish a uniform fiduciary standard on sale of investment products.

    Industry opposes the EBSA proposal. Representatives of the advisor industry contend that it would change the relationship they have with clients. They believe that under ERISA, unlike under securities laws, if the broker-dealer is a fiduciary then they would be prohibited from giving the investment services they give today to IRA investors.

    In a letter transmitting the data to EBSA and the SEC, Kent Mason, a partner at Davis & Harmon, said the report was based on information on over 19 million IRA holders who hold $1.79 trillion in assets through 25.3 million IRA accounts.

    The letter said this constitutes approximately 40% of IRAs in the United States and 40% of IRA assets.

    In other interesting finds, the report said that nearly 40 percent of IRAs in the study sample had less than $10,000, and that small investors overwhelmingly favor brokerage relationships over advisory relationships. The report also found that 98 percent of investor accounts with less than $25,000 were in brokerage relationships.

    Other key findings from the report include:

     

    •  Nearly 40% of IRAs in the study sample had less than $10,000. Small investors overwhelmingly favor brokerage relationships over advisory relationships.

     

    •  98% of investor accounts with less than $25,000 were in brokerage relationships. The proposed rule could eliminate access to meaningful investment services for over 7 million IRAs.

     

    •  IRA investors would no longer be able to receive investment services and help from an investment professional as part of a brokerage relationship.

     

    •  Because of account minimums, 7.2 million current IRAs would not qualify for an advisory account with any firm in the study. The proposed rule could well result in hundreds of thousands of fewer IRAs opened per year.

     

    •  In 2010, firms in the study sample opened approximately 890,000 brokerage IRA accounts with assets of less than $10,000.

     

    •  Under the proposed rule, small investors interested in opening an IRA would have less access to investment professionals for guidance and support, making it less likely that they would open an IRA. Many IRA holders would have reduced choice of investment professional, as over one-third of client-facing financial professionals in the industry would not be licensed to help retail investors with their IRA account needs under the proposed rule. The brokerage IRA investors who could be served in an advisory model would likely face increased costs as a result of the rule-driven change.

     

    •  In the study sample, estimated direct costs would increase by approximately 75% to 195% for these investors.

    Originally Posted at LifeHealthPro on April 6, 2012 by Arthur D. Postal.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency