We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Property owners told to be wary of annuities

    June 3, 2012 by Burton Speakman

    Saturday, June 2, 2012

    By Burton Speakman

    bspeakman@vindy.com

    Youngstown

    Those who have received oil and gas lease payments throughout the Valley are being contacted about an investment plan that local attorneys believe could be hazardous.

    There have been multiple groups pushing annuities to people who have received lease payments, said George Millich, a Youngstown attorney with Harrington, Hoppe & Mitchell, LTD.

    “They refer to an IRS form from 1968 that includes language they’re basing their assumptions on,” Millich said. “They don’t have the IRS blessing.”

    The companies calling are telling people these structured payments are done in a way that will delay their tax burden. There are even some IRS rulings that can be used to attack the annuity claim, he said.

    It does not matter if the lease holder receives a lump sum or a series of payments in terms of tax liability, Millich said.

    The plan also has substantial risk. The person who is paid the lease has to provide his or her money to a third party who is overseas to prevent that company from having to pay taxes, he said.

    “These people are taking a bare-bones promise that the third party will pay,” Millich said.

    In addition, many of the local lease payments are for smaller amounts. If a person does not make that much money and his or her lease payment is $20,000 to $25,000, then the tax liability will not be high and any type of annuity payment would be very low, he said.

    “They always couch their pitch with ‘talk to your counsel.’ But then they get upset when I tell clients I don’t think it would work,” Millich said. “I get a lot of angry calls from the people who promote these things.”

    Eric Johnson, a Canfield attorney who deals solely in oil and gas issues, said several of his clients have contacted him asking questions about annuities.

    There is the possibility that if the plan is taken to court and loses, the individual will not have the money to pay the tax bill. For an annuity, the money has to be placed in a way so the owner does not have access to it, he said. If the IRS came to the individual demanding payment and interest, they would not be able to use the lump-sum payments they received to make restitution.

    “If this would work, why did it take 44 years for somebody to come up with it?” Johnson said. “Are the rest of the investment companies, CPAs and tax attorneys so stupid they couldn’t come up with it?”

    Johnson said he recently spoke with a group of attorneys in southern Ohio about oil and gas issues, and all of them were skeptical that annuities would help people who receive lump payments for oil and gas leases to defer their tax payments.

    “When I first saw this, I thought immediately it wouldn’t pass muster,” he said. “I couldn’t find one single case that showed it would work.”

    There are other tax options available to lease recipients such as setting up a Roth IRA, Millich said. They also could reinvest the money into their farm. None of these measures, however, will reduce tax burdens on the initial payment.

    There is not any sort of approach to investment that works in all situations, said Frank Hierro, president of Huntington Bank’s Mahoning Valley region.

    “Annuities can be good under certain circumstances,” he said.

    Huntington generally would not consider annuities to be the best approach for investment for people receiving a lump-sum payment, Hierro said.

    Individuals who receive lump-sum payments and want to invest should take their time to make a decision on how they will invest and plan for taxes. They owe it to themselves to look for investment advice from someone with a long history of success, he said.

    Structured payments, such as annuities, are good for the companies that organize them because of the fees they collect. They just do not appear to be good for the people who have received lease payments, Millich said.

    Originally Posted at The Vindicator on June 2, 2012 by Burton Speakman.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency