We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • DC Insurance Commissioner White: New Solvency Assessments Set for 'Field Tests'

    February 21, 2013 by N/A

    WASHINGTON – U.S. insurance regulators hope to “field test” new comprehensive solvency assessments later this year to help advance international negotiations over how to properly regulate large, multi-national companies, Washington, D.C. Insurance, Securities and Banking Commissioner William White told Best’s News Service.

    White said the field tests aim to see how solvency assessments developed after the 2008 financial crisis will work within an evolving international regulatory landscape. He did not set a specific date for when the field testing would begin, but said he expects it to start before the end of 2013.

    White has been a prominent figure in negotiations between U.S. and EU regulators about how to integrate two fundamentally different regulatory systems. He serves as a member of the Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance under the Federal Insurance Office and as vice-chairman of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ International Insurance Committee.

    As it stands now, international oversight of insurer solvency is led by supervisory colleges, groups of regulators from the United States, European Union and other jurisdictions. However, because the United States and European Union approach regulation from vastly different starting points, companies doing business in both regions have forced regulators to find a way to resolve those differences.

    The European Union employs a top-down regulatory system in which large insurance groups with global books of business would be governed by a single regulatory college. The United States, of course, has a system led by individual states in which each subsidiary of a groups is governed by regulators from the jurisdiction where it is domiciled.

    U.S. regulators, including White, are working with members of the International Association of Insurance Supervisors to create a common framework for regulating insurance companies doing business on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean.

    But progress on the “Common Framework for the Supervision of Internationally Active Insurance Groups,” or ComFrame, has stalled as regulators struggle to bring the two systems in line with each other. One issue that has divided regulators has been whether to enact an international capital standard. Regulators in Europe support a common global approach, whereas U.S. regulators have argued for standards to be set at the subsidiary level by local regulators.

    White said field testing the solvency assessments may allow regulators to know whether they are getting the information they need to answer those questions.

    “We want to make sure that we are looking at really comprehensive risk profiles from a very broad standpoint,” White said. “For the most part, I think we have been able to capture most of the real concerns about risk there. But putting those into a regulatory framework to really test the solvency of a particular group is something we have not yet done.”

    Among the issues White said regulators will have to consider as they develop a model for the field tests is how to balance the goal of gathering information efficiently with the need for strict confidentiality.

    “We have to make sure we’re able to protect the confidentiality of the companies and the information that they provide because you’re looking at a number of supervisors or regulators who are going to be looking at this information,” White said. “A lot of our effort has been spent on making sure we can ensure that and do it in a way where the company can still be forthcoming with the information.”

    Regulators also face questions about how prescriptive the international insurance regulatory regime needs to be in a post-financial crisis world, White said. Some regulators have called for explicit rules and standards that White said “point to a single way of doing things.”

    Taking that approach may not work as well as an “outcomes-based” system in which regulations focus on achieving desired results and not on adhering to strict standards, White said. “That’s my own view and the view of most U.S. regulators.”

    As negotiations move forward, the insurance community will continue to watch the developing role of the FIO. The office was created two years ago by the Dodd-Frank financial reform act and it is still finding its place in the global insurance marketplace.

    FIO and its director Michael McRaith have drawn praise from insurance regulators and from the industry for playing a “positive” role in advocating on behalf of the U.S. regulatory system. McRaith chairs the IAIS Technical Committee, the organization’s influential policy-development arm.

    “What is important here is that this is a new relationship,” White said. “Everyone understands that we operate with a state-based insurance regulatory framework. The FIO was put together really to bring this all into a single area so we can speak with a fairly comprehensive voice when we’re talking about things on an international basis.”

    White said the NAIC serves an important role on the international stage by allowing state regulators to reach a consensus on policy positions and pass those positions to FIO. “So when Michael McRaith speaks on behalf of the United States where appropriate to international regulators, he is speaking from a very strong position.”

    FIO is overseen by the Treasury Department. It does not have regulatory authority but serves as an information-gathering agency for Congress and Treasury on trends in the insurance industry. The office is also charged with identifying systemic risks to the U.S. financial system posed by the insurance industry and with developing federal policy on international insurance matters, giving it significant influence on insurance regulation in the United States and overseas.

    Recently, FIO has played a key role in discussions with the International Association of Insurance Supervisors over how to integrate the U.S. regulatory system with the new Solvency II regulatory framework being implemented in the European Union (Best’s News Service, Dec. 24, 2012).

    Originally Posted at A.M. Best on February 15, 2013 by N/A.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency