We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • MetLife CEO: Regulators Should Target Those Activities That Caused the Financial Crisis in the First Place

    May 2, 2013 by Fran Matso Lysiak

    NEW YORK – As MetLife Inc. posted a first-quarter profit, its chief executive officer said there’s a better way for the federal government to regulate potentially systemic activities in the life insurance sector.

    “Rather than name a handful of life insurance companies as SIFIs [systemically important financial institutions], regulators should target those activities that caused the financial crisis in the first place,” said Steven A. Kandarian, chairman, precopysident and CEO, in a conference call.

    MetLife posted first-quarter net income of $956 million, compared with a net loss of $174 million the same period a year go. Increases in interest rates, changes in foreign currencies and the impact of its own credit spreads contributed to $493 million in derivative net losses, after tax, and other adjustments but these losses were much higher — at $1.3 billion in the first quarter of 2012.

    MetLife (NYSE: MET) uses derivatives to hedge certain risks, such as movements in interest rates and foreign currencies.

    Operating earnings grew 12% to $1.6 billion, reflecting growth in all three business regions — the Americas; Asia; and Europe, Middle East and Africa. Operating earnings included more adjustments to lapse updates on its stock market-linked variable annuities in its retail business in the Americas, which helped by $29 million.

    The year “is off to a good start,” said Kandarian. Operating earnings “were aided by strong equity markets, favorable investment margins and good performance on expenses.” However, he reiterated that MetLife “faces external headwinds that we cannot control, such as low interest rates and regulatory uncertainty.”

    In the Americas, first-quarter sales of variable annuities declined 29% to $3.5 billion. The sales increase in emerging markets, combined with the drop in sales of variable annuities, “reflect substantial progress on our efforts to shift our business mix away from capital-intensive, market-sensitive products,” Kandarian said.

    In 2011, MetLife said it would be exiting the banking business to avoid the additional scrutiny placed on large banks under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Best’s News Service, April 4, 2012). In February, federal regulators approved MetLife’s plan to deregister as a bank holding company following the sale of its bank to General Electric Capital (Best’s News Service, Feb. 15, 2013).

    MetLife faces Federal Reserve supervision if named a non-bank SIFI, Kandarian said. To date, MetLife has not been notified by the Financial Stability Oversight Council that it has been moved to stage three of the process for designating SIFIs, “although the conventional wisdom holds we will be at some point.”

    He noted he’s spending time in Washington participating in the debate on this issue. In a speech delivered at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce last month, “I stated that the traditional business of life insurance does not present systemic risk to the U.S. economy and that MetLife should not be named a SIFI,” Kandarian said.

    The Dodd-Frank Act defined a SIFI as a company whose failure could pose a threat to the financial stability of the United States, Kandarian said. The FSOC clarified that such a threat only exists if there would be an impairment of financial market functioning that would be sufficiently severe to inflict significant damage on the broader economy, he said.

    “There’s no evidence that any traditional life insurance company is sufficiently inter-connected with the rest of the financial system to meet that test,” Kandarian said. “To be clear, I am not suggesting that MetLife could never fail. What I am suggesting is that we cannot think of a single firm that would be brought down by its exposure to MetLife.”

    On the morning of May 2, MetLife Inc.’s stock was trading at $39.51 a share, up 2.89% from the previous close.

    Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. currently has a Best’s Financial Strength Rating of A+ (Superior).
    (By Fran Matso Lysiak, senior associate editor, BestWeek: fran.lysiak@ambest.com) BN-NJ-05-02-2013 1213 ET #

    Originally Posted at AM Best on May 2, 2013 by Fran Matso Lysiak.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency