We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Interest Rates Are Up But Not In UL — Yet

    August 2, 2013 by Linda Koco

    Interest rates may be rising, but life insurance agents shouldn’t be looking for any interest rate bump-up in universal life policies just yet.

    That’s the word from the gurus who are looking at the numbers.

    In a recent report, SNL Financial pointed out that “interest rates have been on a tear for the past two-and-a-half months.” The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury rose to 2.5 percent on July 19 from 1.7 percent on May 1, SNL pointed out.

    By July 22, the yield had risen to above 2.6 percent though it didn’t stay there. Given that the 10-year dropped to below 1.5 percent at one point last year, that spike got a drum-roll.

    Breathing again

    People in the home offices of insurance companies are probably starting to breathe again, surmised Ben Baldwin Jr., owner of Baldwin Financial Systems of Arlington Heights, Ill., in an interview.

    “Finally, some increase in interest rates. Finally, some hope that interest rates will someday, soon we hope, allow some positive margin again.”

    That all-important margin might mean that producers could start seeing a positive impact on interest crediting rates — a good-news story to bring to clients after the long drought of Down.

    But not right now. “The new universal life products we are seeing this year generally have a 2 percent minimum guaranteed crediting rate,” said Michael Mingolelli Jr., chief executive officer of Pinnacle Financial Group, Southborough, Mass. “This is down from about 2.5 percent last year,” he told InsuranceNewNet.

    This means the universal life carriers are still trying to reduce their exposure, he said. “We have no expectation that this will change later this year.”

    A key reason is the lag that traditionally exists between yields on bonds the carriers buy to support their contractual guarantees and the credited rates offered to customers.

    In the current environment, Mingolelli explained, carriers will be buying bonds at today’s somewhat-higher-than-yesterday yields. But it will still take a while before the bonds purchased during the era of prolonged rock bottom rates fall off the books in appreciable numbers. Hence, the bond yields in company reserves will the lag those in the current rising rate environment.

    And that means current crediting rates and guaranteed minimum interest rates also will lag.

    Portfolios might take a year and one-half or more to catch up, Mingolelli said.

    Remember, carriers buy and hold their bonds until maturity, he said. So the industry focus is always on the rates of the bonds the carriers purchase.

    In an advisory his firm published on interest rate trends a year ago, the firm told agents and advisors that “clients should expect potential crediting rate reductions [emphasis added] of up to 50 basis points over the next three years.” Funding scenarios should be modeled with that expectation in mind, the advisory said.

    “We are still recommending that,” said Mingolelli.

    Another factor affecting the rates that universal life carriers can credit is the legacy business that remains in force. Some of those older policies have guaranteed minimum interest rates of 4 percent, pointed out Kenneth Masters, director of life insurance design and development at Pinnacle.

    As a result, carriers that have those policies will tend to be cautious about raising their crediting rates in universal life, he said.

    Catching the trend

    To glimpse trending in universal life crediting rates, producers can look at corporate investment bond rates, Masters suggested. Those rates correlate well with the interest crediting that carriers do, he said. (As an example, he suggested using Moody’s five-year rolling average.)

    Another area to examine is policy reserve levels. That’s not a go-to subject for some producers, but those who have a few minutes to spare might want to dig in because reserves can be revealing.

    According to SNL, life insurance policies are not the only interest-sensitive products that could potentially be affected by the interest-rate environment. Those products also include disability insurance and long-term care insurance; these are considered interest-sensitive “due to the long duration of the policies and the difficulty in determining the frequency of claims,” the researchers said.

    So are fixed annuities. These policies offer guaranteed interest rates and leave the insurer open to interest rate risk.

    SNL decided to check out the aggregate reserves for the four types of interest-sensitive products between the years 2010 and 2012. To do their analysis, the researchers looked at data in the annual supplements on interest-sensitive policies that carriers file with National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC).

    At the top 30 life insurance companies, the aggregate reserves for the industry’s four interest-sensitive product lines rose 4.3 percent in 2011 to nearly $917 billion from roughly $879 in 2010, according to the SNL analysis. Measured by percentage, more than 60 percent of the carriers in the top 30 beefed up interest-sensitive reserves that year; the other carriers kept their reserves flat or dropped them by a hair.

    The increase could be expected, given the interest rate environment, the researchers commented.

    Spot on. Many carriers announced they were shoring up reserves at the time. “They were doing that because they anticipated that the insurance regulators would demand it of them if they didn’t,” observed Baldwin.

    There are other reasons that can account for increased reserves, such as new regulations or substantial growth in new sales. But in 2011, most experts agree that the dominant factor was probably those downhill rates. After all, yields on 10-year Treasuries fell from 3.3 percent in early January to around 1.9 percent by year-end.

    But in 2012, aggregate reserves went south at the top 30. The aggregates declined by 4 percent—to a little over $880 billion, according to the SNL numbers. That’s close to where reserves were in 2010.

    This turn of events is a bit puzzling. Interest rates were still plummeting in 2012—to less than 2 percent on 10-year yields for much of the year—so wouldn’t the carriers have continued to hold or increase their reserves rather than reduce them?

    Actually, they did. Pinnacle’s Mingolelli pointed out that most of the insurers in the top 30 last year reported increased reserves or reserves that stayed level with 2011. Only six carriers, some of them big, reported decreases, so these outliers skewed the overall numbers.

    In the cases were there were declines, “the culprit may have been fixed annuities” rather than disability, long term care or even life insurance trends, said Timothy Pfeifer, president of Pfeifer Advisory of Libertyville, Ill.

    Some customers were 1035-ing out of fixed annuities due to the low interest rates last year, Pfeifer recalled. Meanwhile, many carriers had taken steps to slow down sales, and new buyers were staying away anyhow due to the low rates. So in some cases, there were not enough new sales to stabilize reserves, he said.

    Putting it all together, it appears that interest-sensitive policy reserves may be a type of trailing indicator of what is happening in overall interest crediting, based on what has already happened.

    It’s somewhat of a maze to sort through, but once the inquirer spots momentum, that can be valuable information to share with clients who are interested in interest.

    Next three years

    In the next three years, a “good scenario” for the industry would be a steady rate increase of 100 basis points per annum, said Chicago’s Fitch Ratings in a recent report on interest rate risk for U.S. life insurers. “This scenario is favorable across all major product lines and particularly interest-sensitive products such as fixed annuities, universal life and long-term care.”

    Linda Koco, MBA, is a contributing editor to InsuranceNewsNet, specializing in life insurance, annuities and income planning. Linda can be reached at linda.koco@innfeedback.com.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on July 29, 2013 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency