We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • When “That Person No Longer Works Here

    April 21, 2014 by Linda Koco

    Did you ever email or phone a person you’ve dealt with at an insur­ance com­pany or major sales outlet only to learn the person no longer works there?

    Sometimes — actu­ally, too many times — the only indi­ca­tion that the person has left the com­pany is the bounced email or the phone call rerouting that goes nowhere. The out­side caller or email-sender is left with ques­tions — What hap­pened? Did Jon or Suzanne leave or die? Who do I con­tact now? — and uneasy feelings.

    For sure, if the now-missing person has retired or left the com­pany for “per­sonal rea­sons,” that news some­times makes it into the media, espe­cially if the work­place is a highly vis­ible com­pany. A listing on a social media net­work might pro­vide some clues, too. And, if death is the cause, the obit­uary page of the local paper might carry the news.

    But those are excep­tions, not the rule. It sure is frus­trating, espe­cially if the out­side caller/emailer has reached out for busi­ness rea­sons. If the need is urgent, the time and effort the person must expend to get some help goes beyond being annoying. It becomes aggra­vating, and depending on the out­come, it might make the out­sider wonder if serious prob­lems are afoot at the firm.

    Imagine the wel­come sur­prise, then, when MassMutual issued an announce­ment this week about senior man­age­ment team changes at its Retirement Services Division. The state­ment not only announced the hiring of sev­eral new exec­u­tives; it also included news of the depar­ture of two other exec­u­tives, giving their names and where they’re heading next.

    In addi­tion, the announce­ment quoted a top level exec­u­tive who thanked the departing exec­u­tives for their lead­er­ship, vision and team­work. She also expressed appre­ci­a­tion for their con­tri­bu­tions, and said the com­pany wishes them well in their new endeavors and looks for­ward to “lasting rela­tion­ships in their new capacities.”

    Nicely done, MassMutual. This is cor­dial, pos­i­tive, and busi­nesslike. It injects a sense of con­ti­nuity without going over­board on detail.

    That’s not always pos­sible, of course. Some employees leave a com­pany due to mass lay­offs or because they were fired or entan­gled in “bad blood” dis­putes. Some just relo­cated to another branch. Some are coping with dif­fi­cult per­sonal issues and don’t want any atten­tion drawn to them­selves or their depar­ture. Some may have sev­er­ance pack­ages that include binding non-disclosure pro­vi­sions. Privacy poli­cies, human resource poli­cies, state laws and a myriad of other fac­tors can influ­ence this.

    But even when those very under­stand­able rea­sons are at work, firms should still be able to help out­side callers/emailers learn what they need to know to resolve their busi­ness ques­tions with a min­imum of hassle when an employee leaves.

    A couple of sug­ges­tions come to mind: 1) Provide a clear path for han­dling incoming emails and calls that arrive for a worker who has left; and 2) Let existing staff know exactly what to say when out­siders fish around for reasons.

    Larger car­riers seem to have a drill-down on this but not so the mid-sized and smaller firms and agen­cies. Fortunately, there are plenty of expert resources avail­able on the Web and in person that can pro­vide ideas and assis­tance. Addressing this is one more hassle to deal with when a worker leaves, but if dead-end calls or emails stir up a harmful round of com­plaints or rumors, that hassle will be the least of the firm’s problems.

     

     

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet Blog on April 21, 2014 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency