We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Why FIA Sales Galloped To New Records

    April 8, 2014 by Linda Koco

    Fixed index annuities put the pedal to the metal in 2013. The major annuity researchers show sales premium for the products ringing in very close to $40 billion, a new record.

    In fact, this was the fifth consecutive record-setting year for fixed indexed annuity (FIA) sales, according to Sheryl J. Moore, president and chief executive officer of Wink Inc. Wink has put 2013 fixed indexed annuity (FIA) sales at $38.7 billion, up 13.4 percent from 2012.

    LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute (LIMRA SRI) estimated a somewhat higher total of $39.3 billion — up 16 percent in from the prior year.

    And Beacon Research came in a bit higher still, at $39.6 billion, for an increase of about 15.7 percent from the $34.2 billion that Beacon reported for 2012 sales.

    Why did FIAs gallop?

    By whichever number measured, the double-digit growth occurred in the same year when another type of annuity, the variable annuity, saw sales drop by 1.5 percent. The contrast in growth outcome makes the FIA upward trajectory all the more fascinating. Why did FIAs gallop ahead?

    For the sake of perspective, variable annuity sales still far overshadowed those of FIAs. Morningstar reported that variables sold $142.8 billion in 2013, for instance, a few billion down from the $145 billion sold in 2012. Still, FIAs represented 50 percent of all fixed annuity sales in fourth quarter 2013, according to Beacon, and they have hovered around this percentage all year. This makes FIAs a very significant part of the fixed annuity marketplace.

    So how did they reach a new record in sales? It didn’t happen in a vacuum. Data and commentary from all three research firms indicates that several factors contributed.

    One trend was the overall climate for fixed sales. Beacon president Jeremy Alexander pointed out that the entire fixed annuity industry — not just the indexed sector — “had its best year since 2009.”

    For the year, fixed annuity sales totaled $78.1 billion industrywide, up 16.6 percent from $67 billion in 2012, Beacon reported. In the LIMRA SRI data, the sales were up 17 percent from 2012 on total fixed annuity premium of $84.8 billion.

    A chief driver for that growth was the rising interest rate environment. In 2013, average credited rates for fixed annuity products increased by 40 basis points, Alexander said.

    In early December, the Fisher Annuity Index reported the average rate for all fixed annuities in its database at 2.87 percent, and the high norm was 4.75 percent. Twelve months previous, the average rate was 2.48 percent.

    Joe Montminy, assistant vice president at LIMRA SRI Annuity Research, pointed out that the improved rate environment made the fixed annuity offerings more attractive — a point well taken, given that competing products like bank savings accounts and shorter-term bank certificates of deposit were paying under 1 percent.

    It may be that the rising-tide-lifts-all-boats phenomenon was at work, helping along the FIA sales as well as sales of other fixed annuity products. “For the first time, there were year-over-year increases in sales of all types of fixed annuities,” Alexander said.

    Banks and wirehouses

    So was the if-you-can’t-beat-em-join-em mentality, at least in the banks and maybe the wirehouses.

    Wink’s numbers show that banks and wirehouses have increased their FIA sales. For example, in fourth quarter 2013, bank sales of the products represented 11.5 percent of all sales for the three-month period, the firm said. That’s up from just 6.5 percent in fourth quarter 2012.

    FIA-snipers might say a 11.5 percent share in one quarter is too small to count as significant. But the growth occurred in a quarter when overall FIA sales rose by 35 percent, to $11.5 billion, from the same year-earlier quarter, according to Wink. This means that, in 2013, the banks took a bigger share of a bigger pie. When that happens in any business, most observers consider the gains to be worthy of competitive analysis — and response.

    The growth in banks is significant for another reason, too. Time was when banks sold very little by way of FIAs. For example, in the fourth quarter of 2007, bank share of fixed index annuity sales was 3 percent, and in 2008, it was 4.3 percent, according to Wink reports. But now the bank share is more than double those earlier percentages, signaling greater adoption of the product.

    Some FIA professionals believe that the upside growth potential with downside guarantee has become a compelling story for banks to tell. While that is likely the case, the growth in bank sales was probably influenced by other factors, too. These include greater outreach to banks, especially among FIA carriers that use the multi-channel distribution model, plus the possible availability of a premium bonus.

    The growth in wirehouse distribution is not as dramatic as in bank distribution. But it’s notable due to the disinterest that wirehouses have shown in FIAs over the years. In fourth quarter 2013, wirehouses took a 2.6 percent market share, up from 1.2 percent in 2012, according to Wink.

    That said, independent agents did continue to take the majority of FIA sales last year. Their fourth quarter 2013 share came to nearly 81 percent, according to Wink. That’s very close to the previous quarter’s 82 percent, though down from 87 percent in fourth quarter 2012.

    It’s unlikely that those shifts in share signal that independent FIA agents will retreat from this market. For one thing, growth of FIA sales in the banking and independent broker/dealer channels has been organic and additive, and “not at the expense of the independent channel,” according to LIMRA SRI’s Montminy.

    For another, the independent channel’s market share shifts by a few points virtually every quarter, but for several years it has remained somewhere in the 80 percent range in Wink’s numbers. Insurance and financial practitioners are quick to point out that historical performance is no guarantee of future results; however, they can at least be viewed as a benchmark.

    Other factors

    Some other factors that may have contributed to the FIA sales growth in 2013 include:

    • Barclay’s/Lehman. Wink’s data shows that this index-linking option took 11.2 percent of fourth quarter FIA sales in 2013. That’s up from just 0.6 percent in the previous quarter and 0.3 percent in fourth quarter 2012, an interesting development given that the option is available in only a limited number of currently-sold products. By comparison, the S&P 500 index represented approximately 62 percent of FIA sales in the quarter down from nearly 67 percent in third quarter although the same percentage as in fourth quarter 2012.

     

    • Bigger policies. The average indexed annuity sales premium reported was $83,499 in fourth quarter 2013, according to Wink. That’s down by more than 1 percent from third quarter but up substantially from the average ($69,454) reported in fourth quarter 2012.

     

    • Commissions stayed low. In fact, in fourth quarter 2013, the indexed annuity commission received by the agent averaged 5.58 percent of premium, “the lowest-ever average commission paid to the sales agent,” according to Wink.

     

    • More policies sold. Wink numbers show that overall policy count for fourth quarter 2013 was 103,262, up by more than 18 percent compared to third quarter and up substantially from fourth quarter 2012, when policies sold numbered 85,913.

    Other factors, such as new distribution arrangements, product debuts and concepts, also played a role.

    Putting it together, more FIAs were sold in 2013 than the previous year at higher face amounts. They were sold in an environment paying lower average commissions. Some sales included a still-rare (for indexed annuities) crediting index (Barclay’s/Lehman). All this happened in an economy with rising interest rates, which helped lift sales of all fixed annuity products including the FIAs.

     

     

    FIA Sales Streak

    One Record-Breaker After Another

    2013 $38.7 billion
    2012 $34.1 billion
    2011 $32.4 billion
    2010 $32.3 billion
    2009 $30.1 billion
    Source: Data extracted from Wink Sales & Market Reports. Numbers are rounded.

     

     

    Originally Posted at AnnuityNews.com on April 1, 2014 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Sheryl's Articles
    currency