We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Speakers debate value of global regulatory standard

    May 27, 2014 by Matthew Patane

    An international move to put a global regulatory standard over U.S.-based insurance companies could increase costs to consumers, but it could also help prevent a future financial crisis, speakers at this week’s Global Insurance Symposium said.

    The suggested global standard would create one system for determining how much capital insurance companies would need to have, meaning they would have to save more in their reserves instead of spending money on new products or company expansions.

    The capital requirement, opponents to the standard argue, would put an undue burden on insurance companies in the U.S. Those companies would then have to pass extra costs on to their policyholders.

    “The additional costs of capital will not be borne by shareholders and bondholders, but by policyholders,” said Ben Nelson, the CEO of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

    A singular system, Nelson and others said, could decrease competition in the insurance market and reduce the amount of money insurance companies could spend on new products and lower-priced premiums. That, in turn, could increase the costs for consumers.

    Proponents, however, have said the single system would help quell the possibility of another financial crisis like the one that occurred in 2008 by taking some of the risk out of the insurance market. A more consistent system across markets, they say, will also fit with the increasingly global nature of the insurance industry.

    “Under such evolution, we need a regulatory approach that is somewhat consistent across sectors,” said Naruki Mori, the assistant commissioner for international affairs of the Japan Financial Services Agency.

    The International Association of Insurance Supervisors Executive Committee, where Mori is a vice chair, announced last year that it is working on establishing a risk-based global capital standard by 2016. Full implementation would come in 2019.

    In addition to pressures from the federal level following the financial crisis, that international plan has caused concern among U.S.-based insurers who prefer the nation’s current system where regulations and standards are determined by state.

    “The big issue post-the-financial-crisis, and as a result of Dodd-Frank, is the federal government is coming into insurance regulation in a very big way,” said Larry Zimpleman, chairman, president and CEO of Des Moines-based Principal Financial Group. “It’s just going to take us a few years to sort of harmonize and figure out how those (supervisory) entities work together.”

    Another worry among insurers, Nelson said, is that the proposed regulations under the global standard do not fit with the insurance sector.

    “This is a banking system of regulation that some would like to impose over our system of regulation, which is insurance regulation. They’re not the same,” he said.

    Multiple symposium speakers alluded to how well the insurance sector fared during the financial crisis compared with other industries as another reason a global standard is not necessary.

    When introducing a panel Thursday, for example, Faegre Baker Daniels partner and lawyer Charlie Richardson paraphrased a Warren Buffett quote: “Warren Buffett famously remarked, ‘When the economic tides go out, you see who is swimming naked,’ ” Richardson said. “When the economic tides went out in 2008 and 2009, much of the insurance sector was clothed in Midwest-modest, neck-ankle swimsuits giving the unidigital salute to the bucknaked banks, investment banks, auto sector and so many others that were dropping like flies.”

    Mori acknowledged there are concerns about a single standard and said should a global standard be established, it would have to be done correctly.

    “There is an efficiency gain in having a global standard,” Mori said. “But we have to be careful because we want to maintain the functionality of our insurance companies.”

    Four insurance company executives discuss what they like about working in Iowa during the Global Insurance Symposium in Des Moines on Thursday, May 22. Matthew Patane/The Register
     
     

    What’s next for the symposium?

    The first Global Insurance Symposium had yet to come to an end, but organizers said they were already planning to do another in 2015.

    “We’ve already made the decision that we’re going to move forward and do the second annual Global Insurance Symposium next year,” said Greater Des Moines Partnership CEO Jay Byers.

    The Partnership, the Iowa Insurance Division and the Iowa Economic Development Authority organized this year’s symposium. The conference ended Thursday after three days of speeches and panels focused on insurance regulatory issues.

    At the very end of the symposium, Iowa Insurance Commissioner Nick Gerhart told attendees that the event had brought in about 350 guests during its three days from Tuesday to Thursday.

    At least 125 of those came from outside the U.S., according to the symposium’s organizers.

    Speaking after the event, Gerhart and Byers said they still wanted to assess this year’s symposium but were looking to have more participants at next year’s event.

    Click here to view video

    Originally Posted at Des Moines Register on May 23, 2014 by Matthew Patane.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency