We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • NAFA Response: Beware of the Equity Indexed Annuity blog – Could it be merely a Siren Song?

    June 18, 2014 by NAFA President

    NAFA Response: Beware of the Equity Indexed Annuity blog – Could it be merely a Siren Song?

    NAFA Response to Zamansky LLC Posted: May 07, 2014

    As an organization exclusively dedicated to promoting the awareness and understanding of fixed annuities, NAFA, the National Association for Fixed Annuities, is compelled to share its concerns regarding the way your recent article both inaccurately explains fixed indexed annuities and makes false statements regarding fees.

    Zamansky: Brokers have been pitching their clients who have been seeking yield, “indexed annuities”, a confusing product which really doesn’t fit the clients’ needs.

    NAFA: In our world of fixed annuities, fixed indexed annuities in particular, we are bound by a very important consumer protection feature called the Suitability Standard which requires that BEFORE you make any recommendation you review with each and every client a long list of over a dozen client-specific pieces of information, including: financial objectives, retirement goals, financial timelines and risk tolerance, just to name a few. It is interesting that a law firm who has not reviewed each individual’s needs and therefore does not know what they are, can make the broad and unsubstantiated claim that “indexed annuities don’t fit clients’ needs.” Certainly, they do fit some clients’ needs. Sellers of fixed indexed annuities are prohibited from making ANY recommendation to purchase UNTIL they do a complete suitability review of the individual’s needs and situation. And then each insurer must review A SECOND TIME the same information to double check the recommendation before they can issue an annuity contract.

    Zamansky: Indexed annuities, which appear to simulate the returns of stocks, have come under the scrutiny of FINRA according to a report over the weekend by industry newspaper InvestmentNews. FINRA is looking for red flags such as the cost to clients, as high as 6-8% and whether these complicated fees were adequately disclosed by the broker to clients, according to reporters Bruce Kelly and Darla Mercado.

    NAFA: Indexed annuities DO NOT appear to simulate the returns of stocks. In fact they DO NOT simulate the returns of stocks. They simply and transparently calculate the amount of interest that is credited, based on the positive performance of a market index. When the stock market loses, the fixed indexed annuity owner DOESN’T. The indexed annuity owner does not participate directly in the market index and does not receive all of the gains of the market index. That is simply a tradeoff, as the indexed annuity promises that you will not incur any of the LOSSES of the market indexed; this allows the purchaser to turn their deferred indexed annuity into a series of payments they cannot outlive, guaranteed and insured. Also, it is unclear where you came up with costs of 6-8%. It was not mentioned in the article you cite nor does FINRA state it in their announcement. MOST IMPORTANTLY, indexed annuities do not have fees that the client must pay unless they add on a rider for an additional, optional benefit; notably, there is no rider available today that is anywhere near 6% in cost.

    Zamansky: Indeed, stock brokers are becoming more of a force in the world of equity indexed annuities, which have typically been sold by insurance agents. 

    NAFA: Wrong – indexed annuities can ONLY be sold by insurance agents. You must hold an insurance license to sell indexed annuities. This has been always true and is true of any broker selling fixed annuities. You can also hold a broker’s license or be an investment advisor, but you must be a licensed insurance agent to sell indexed annuities. And according to LIMRA, the brokers selling fixed indexed annuities are not just “stock brokers” but brokers who also sell mutual funds, variable annuities and set-rate fixed annuities or immediate annuities.

    Zamansky: One positive note regarding this trend is that brokers are more highly regulated than insurance agents. Those agents have no central self-governing and regulatory organization like FINRA to watch over the hundreds of thousands of insurance agents currently pumping out expensive and confusing equity indexed annuities. Instead, they are regulated solely by individual states.

    NAFA: If brokers are more highly regulated, why then does FINRA feel the need to step-up their regulation and focus? Is it because almost 35,000 complaints were lodged in 2012 (latest statistic available) against sellers of securities versus only 57 in 2013 for fixed indexed annuities? This statistic is despite the fact that over 335 billion were sold since they were introduced almost 20 years ago. Because individuals who buy fixed annuities can call their own state insurance department (who are charged to protect consumers and aggressively oversee agent sales practices, disclosure, suitability, compliance, etc.) must work with the consumer to directly resolve the issue without the consumer having to hire a lawyer for arbitration as FINRA would require, your siren call of this blog may not bear fruit. ONLY FIXED ANNUITIES require:

    1. State laws and regulations that require insurance companies to review the sale of each and every fixed annuity before a contract is issued to determine the suitability of the recommendation based on an individual’s financial situation and retirement goals.
    2. A “free look” period so that the purchaser can be certain they want to proceed with the purchase.
    3. Product-specific training for each annuity salesperson before making a recommendation.

    Also note, the term “equity” is no longer used in conjunction with indexed annuities. After the first few indexed annuities were introduced (almost 20 years ago), other market indices were quickly added, rendering “equity” archaic and inaccurate. The NAIC Annuity Buyer’s Guides, marketing materials, insurance forms, disclosures and annuity contracts have all removed the term to eliminate consumer confusion and we encourage you to do the same. None of the above is true for salespeople who sell securities. So let’s turn off the sirens, and help people understand – accurately and factually, without prejudice or the desire to drum up business – the benefits and limitations of fixed indexed annuities. Perhaps then, Americans planning for retirement can make informed decisions that benefit their financial needs.

     

    Sincerely,

    Kim O’Brien

    President & CEO

    NAFA

    Originally Posted at NAFA on June 18, 2014 by NAFA President.

    Categories: Negative Media
    currency