We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • It’s no longer safe to say ‘safe’ in Colorado: BLOG

    July 31, 2014 by Linda Koco

    How safe is safe? In Colorado, it appears that the term ”safe” is no longer safe for life insurance and annuity advertisers to use.

    A regulatory amendment that took effect on July 1 adds the term “safe” to the list of terms that life and annuity advertisements may not use. Other additions to the list are the terms “secure” and “certificate of deposit or CD.” The prohibited terms list now numbers 19 verboten terms for use in life and annuity advertisements.

    The change appears in Section 5.B of the amended Colorado Regulation 3 CCR 702 — 4, 4–1-2. The regulation is based on the National Association of Insurance Commissioners advertising model, with some amendments along the way.

    It’s easy to understand the purpose of the change, which is to prevent misrepresentation in advertisements. (Specifically, the regulation says no advertisement shall use the listed terms “in connection with a policy in a context or under such circumstances or conditions as to have the capacity or tendency to mislead.”)

    But life and annuity professionals are bound to wonder, how are they to portray the role of fixed life and annuity contracts or policies with various high-demand guarantees in a customer’s asset allocation (or product allocation) without using the word “safe”?

    The online Merriam-Webster dictionary defines safe as: “not able or likely to be hurt or harmed in any way; not in danger; not able or likely to be lost, taken away, or given away; and not involving or likely to involve danger, harm, or loss.”

    It is likely that these commonly understood definitions are what many insurance professionals have in mind when presenting those fixed and guaranteed contracts as “safe” options for consumers — i.e., “not able or likely to be lost, taken away.”

    Some producers do this to distinguish the policies from products having no underlying guarantees or having no protection from potential loss of principal. This has been a national trend for the past several years.

    A Colorado press officer tells me that regulators there have encountered problems with the misuse of the words “safe” and “secure,” as well as “certificate of deposit.” Hence, the move to prohibit those words. The department’s position is that “the amended regulation is now strong enough for the Colorado Department of Insurance to consider the use of such terms a violation, and if necessary, to push to the Colorado Attorney General’s Office for further review,” he said.

    It would be difficult to find anyone in the insurance industry who objects to prohibitions against the use of misleading language in advertisements and marketing materials. Misrepresentation leads to headaches for all concerned — consumer, agent, company and industry.

    But sometimes, regulations like this make more sense if there are qualifiers. This keeps the baby from being thrown out with the proverbial bathwater.

    An example can be found in the advertising rules of Federal Reserve’s Regulation DD . The rules say, for example, that an advertisement “may not use the word ‘profit’ in referring to interest paid on an account.” Neither may an advertisement “describe an account as ‘free’ or ‘no cost’ (or contain a similar term such as ‘fees waived’) if a maintenance or activity fee may be imposed on the account.”

    Of course, those stipulations apply to advertisements by depository institutions, not insurance firms, but the idea of including a qualifier with the statement is certainly applicable, especially for terms where use is accurate in some cases but not all. I’ve seen similar approaches in insurance regulations.

    For now, it behooves industry professionals, compliance experts and other concerned parties to digest the regulation and the implications for their respective businesses.

    Read at http://blog.insurancenewsnet.com/2014/07/31/its-no-longer-safe-to-say-safe-in-colorado/

     

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet Blog on July 31, 2014 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency