We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • NAMIC: IAIS Basic Capital Requirements Proposal Could Pose Problems to Industry

    July 14, 2014 by Jeff Jeffrey

    WASHINGTON – Representatives of the insurance industry are already expressing concern about the International Association of Insurance Supervisors’ proposed basic capital requirements for global systemically important insurers.

    The IAIS released an updated version of the proposed basic capital requirements on July 9 and asked the industry to submit comments about potential problems or concerns. This is the second comment period the IAIS has held as it develops the requirements (Best’s News Service, July 9, 2014).

    Michelle Rogers, director of financial and regulatory policy for the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, said the IAIS proposed timeline for implementing the requirements and the method for calculating minimum capital levels could pose problems for insurers.

    However, Rogers said she thought the IAIS proposal “could have been worse.”

    She said NAMIC is still analyzing the proposal to see what its impact may be, but the organization was pleased to see that this stage of the IAIS plan is limited to global systemically important insurers. “If the IAIS had moved to apply the requirements to all internationally active insurers at this stage, it would have had a significant impact on how they do business,” Rogers said.

    When the IAIS released the proposal on July 10, the organization said the basic capital requirements currently under development are part of a three-stage process to enact risk-based, group-wide global insurance capital standards. According to the IAIS, the second step is the development of higher loss absorbency requirements for G-SIIs, which are due to be completed by the end of 2015. The final step is to develop risk-based group-wide global insurance capital standards, which are expected to be completed by the end of 2016 and applied to so-called internationally active insurance groups from 2019.

    “We think that if the standards are going to be implemented, the IAIS should be wary of moving too quickly. The staged approach helps to avoid that,” Rogers said.

    That said, the IAIS has set a relatively short window for when comments may be submitted. The industry and regulators have until Aug. 8 to file comment letters. The IAIS said it hopes to submit a final version of the requirements to the G-20 at its meeting in November.

    “There is not a lot of time for the industry to respond and for the IAIS to make any changes,” Rogers said.

    NAMIC is also worried about the proposed method used to calculate basic capital levels, Rogers said.

    Under the proposal, the amount of capital G-SIIs would be required to hold would be calculated on a consolidated group-wide basis, with all holding companies, insurance legal entities, banking legal entities and any other service companies included in the consolidation.

    The IAIS said the basic capital requirements will be constructed to take into account three components: an insurance component; a banking component that applies the Basel III leverage ratio or risk weights; and a component for other non-insurance activities (financial and material non-financial) not currently subject to regulatory capital requirements.

    Fifteen factors will be used to aid in the calculated basic capital requirements for different insurance segments, which include traditional life insurance, traditional non-life insurance, non-traditional insurance and assets, the IAIS said.

    Rogers said U.S. insurers would find it difficult to calculate capital levels on a group-wide basis because the state-led regulatory system used domestically regulates each subsidiary individually. Each state oversees subsidiaries domiciled within their borders.

    But Rogers added only applying the basic capital requirements to G-SIIs would limit the impact on the industry, at least in the short term.

    Currently, there are nine companies set to be designated as G-SIIs. The list includes American International Group Inc.; Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. Inc.; Prudential Financial Inc.; and Prudential plc (Best’s News Service, Oct. 30, 2013). The Financial Stability Board has also given G-SII designations Allianz SE; Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A.; Aviva plc; Axa S.A.; and Ping An Insurance Company of China Ltd. The FSB has indicated that more companies could be added to the list.

    (By Jeff Jeffrey, Washington Bureau manager: jeff.jeffrey@ambest.com)

    Originally Posted at A.M. Best on July 10, 2014 by Jeff Jeffrey.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency