We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Wall St. Bankrolls Ex-Exec As He Sues Over AIG Bailout

    September 26, 2014 by BEN PROTESS and AARON M. KESSLER

    One might call it ”chutzpah,” as several irate lawmakers did, or ”rubbing salt in the wounds” of the American taxpayer. But to a fewWall Street financiers, a lawsuit that accuses the government of shortchanging theAmerican International Group in its 2008 bailout is something else: a promising investment in a cause they support.

    Maurice R. Greenberg, 89, the former A.I.G. chief executive who still holds a large stake in the insurance company, filed the lawsuit on behalf of fellow shareholders. He has now raised several million dollars from threeWall Street companions to help cover the cost of the case. The investors, who are entitled to a cut of any damagesMr. Greenberg collects from the government, contributed about 15 percent of the tens of millions of dollars in legal costs, according to people with knowledge of the arrangement.

    Six years after the government savedWall Street from the brink of collapse, the lawsuit is coming to trial, reopening one of the ugliest chapters in modern financial history. The trial, which begins next week inWashington, will most likely hinge on testimony from the policy makers who orchestrated A.I.G.’s rescue, including former Federal Reserve ChairmanBen S. Bernanke and former Treasury SecretaryTimothy F. Geithner.

    With the legal bills mounting in the three-year case,Mr. Greenberg sought support from a certain breed of investor — those who have misgivings about the government.Kenneth G. Langone, the former director of theNew York Stock Exchange who spent years fending off accusations from theNew York attorney general’s office, contributed toMr. Greenberg’s legal fund, the people said.Steven A. Cohen, whose hedge fund was indicted on charges of insider trading last year, considered investing, too, but ultimately declined.

    The investments fromMr. Greenberg’s friends — their decisions and the details of their arrangement have not been previously reported — have breathed new life into a case that the government thought would never reach trial. After all, by the government’s reckoning, A.I.G. had only one alternative to the bailout: bankruptcy.

    The lawsuit, which seeks more than $40 billion from the government, does not dispute that A.I.G. needed a $182 billion lifeline to survive the financial crisis. It instead challenges the onerous nature of the rescue. The government took what became a 92 percent stake in the company — a step it did not pursue with other bailed-out Wall Street giants — imposed a steep interest rate and steered billions of dollars to the insurer’s trading partners. Those decisions, the suit says, cheated A.I.G. shareholders and violated the Fifth Amendment, which prohibits the taking of private property for ”public use, without just compensation.”

    Mr. Greenberg also contends that the Fed lacked the legal authority to demand a stake in A.I.G. That argument stems partly from past rulings, including aSupreme Court case that challengedPresident Truman’s takeover of the steel industry during the Korean War.

    The case thrusts A.I.G. into a fight that the company itself does not support. For the insurer, which has since repaid the bailout and regained its footing,Mr. Greenberg’s case is a reminder of a time when it was synonymous with the excessive risk-taking that nearly imploded the economy.

    The trial, at theUnited States Court of Federal Claims inWashington, will also place an unwelcome spotlight on the government, forcingMr. Bernanke andMr. Geithner to justify their unconventional policies. The government, which turned a$22.7 billion profit on the A.I.G. bailout, senses a broader public policy threat from the case as well, warning that a verdict inMr. Greenberg’s favor could set a precedent thatWall Street firms are legally entitled to bailouts on their own terms.Mr. Greenberg’s lawyers dispute that notion.

    At times, the case has pitted one government agency against another.The Treasury Department, dismayed that the case made it to trial, briefly considered hiringNeil H. MacBride, a prominent former prosecutor now at the law firm Davis Polk, to supplement theJustice Department lawyers assigned to the case, according to people with knowledge of the matter. That idea irritated someJustice Department officials, the people said, particularly since the law firmDebevoise & Plimpton was already advising the government. Ultimately,Mr. MacBride was not retained.

    For his fight,Mr. Greenberg hiredDavid Boies, the litigator who led theJustice Department’s antitrust trial againstMicrosoft and later helped overturnCalifornia’s ban on same-sex marriage.

    Mr. Boies, 73, has become de facto counsel forMr. Greenberg, steering him through accusations of accounting impropriety during his tenure as chief executive and handling his litigation with A.I.G. after his departure. Their ties extend toYale Law School, where professorships are named for both men.Mr. Boies, an alumnus, and his wife, Mary, financed the professorship inMr. Greenberg’s name.

    In the A.I.G. case, Mr. Greenberg is sparing no expense. His legal team, which has taken over nearly an entire floor of a downtown Washington hotel near the courthouse, also includes the Wall Street law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.

    To help finance the fight,Mr. Greenberg turned to his friends onWall Street, putting a personal twist on so-called litigation financing, a growing industry for hedge funds and specialty firms.

    His pitch resonated withMr. Langone, a close friend and vocal supporter ofMr. Greenberg.J. Christopher Flowers, a private equity executive who happened to warn theTreasury Department inSeptember 2008 that A.I.G. was careering toward collapse, also invested in the legal fund, the people with knowledge of the financing arrangement said. The identity of the third investor could not be learned.

    Mr. Greenberg’s effort came to light in a report byFox Business Network in June. While it is unclear whether that report scared off some potential investors,Mr. Cohen, the hedge fund manager, declined to invest.Peter G. Peterson, an outspoken fiscal conservative who served in the Nixon administration and helped found the giant private equity firmthe Blackstone Group, also turned downMr. Greenberg.

    Mr. Greenberg delivered his pitch to the investors at a meeting in his office this March, according to the people with knowledge of the financing arrangement. He also made personal appeals.Mr. Greenberg was seen having lunch withMr. Cohen at the Four Seasons restaurant inManhattan in April.

    The trial is the latest front inMr. Greenberg’s long campaign to keep a finger on A.I.G., a company he presided over for nearly 40 years and fashioned into the most valuable insurer in the world. Since his resignation in 2005 in the face of accounting investigations — he settled an S.E.C. action in 2009 and is going to trial next year in a 10-year-old lawsuit from theNew York Attorney General’s Office –Mr. Greenberg has fought to maintain his influence.

    The bailout presented a threat to that power. When the government took what became a 92 percent equity stake, it diluted the value and voting rights of shares belonging to existing stockholders, includingMr. Greenberg’s company,Starr International. At the time of the bailout, Starr was A.I.G.’s largest investor.

    Mr. Greenberg, a veteran of two wars who continues to lift weights well into his 80s, registered his complaint withMr. Geithner, who was president of the Federal Reserve Bank ofNew York before becoming Treasury secretary. He calledMr. Geithner at least six times, according toTreasury Department calendars, and met him in 2010 to suggest restructuring the bailout.

    Unsatisfied, Mr. Greenberg filed suit a year later. Initially, the case hit a dead end. A federal judge in Manhattan dismissed the case, a decision that a federal appeals court upheld.

    Now, however, Mr. Greenberg’s legal team could benefit from trying the case before the claims court in Washington, which typically hears more obscure lawsuits over issues like tax rebates and government contracts. Recently, the court has become a go-to site for Wall Street to pursue its grievances with the government, including hedge funds that filed claims over the bailout of the mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

    Driving Mr. Greenberg’s case is the argument that the government singled out A.I.G. to receive the harshest of bailouts.

    For one, it initially paid more than 14 percent interest on a line of credit from the government, which the lawsuit contends was ”an extortionate interest rate.” The decision to use taxpayer and A.I.G. money to repurchase soured mortgage deals that the company insured for big banks in the form of credit-default swaps amounted to a ”backdoor bailout” of Wall Street, the lawsuit says. And the government’s equity stake ”took control of A.I.G. away from its shareholders.”

    The final straw, according to the lawsuit, came when the government ”deliberately ignored and evaded” a shareholder vote against an increase in shares that would accommodate the government’s equity stake. A.I.G. created a reverse stock split, the lawsuit claims, that effectively allowed the company to circumvent that vote.

    The government has dismissed that argument as a ”conspiracy theory.” And government lawyers note that A.I.G.’s board accepted the terms of the bailout, which they argue benefited Mr. Greenberg in the long run, saying that ”the common shareholders’ 20.1 percent equity stake in A.I.G. after the rescue was worth more than their 100 percent equity stake before the rescue.”

    ”Neither the Constitution nor the Federal Reserve Act required American taxpayers to rescue A.I.G. and cushion the fall of its shareholders, much less to do so on terms even more favorable to Starr,” the government said in court papers.

    Michael Corkery, Jessica Silver-Greenberg and Andrew Ross Sorkin contributed reporting.

     

     

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on September 24, 2014 by BEN PROTESS and AARON M. KESSLER.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency