We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • LICENSED TO SELL… AND STAY COMPLIANT! PART II

    November 14, 2014 by Kim O'Brien

    MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT

    In the last issue, we mentioned there were a number of significant developments in state actions against sellers of annuities. Those state actions provided insight about what regulators and prosecutors are watching. Over the course of the last two months, we continued travelling to many of our members’ meetings and spoke to annuity professionals. It won’t surprise you that the most frequently asked questions remained the same:

    1. What licenses should I get?
    2. What designations may I use?
    3. How can I be sure my seminars, website and marketing materials are compliant?

    Since we focused on the types of licenses that may benefit an annuity practice and the types of activities each of those licenses permit and those they prohibit in the last issue, let’s continue with professional designations.

    Professional Designations

    NAFA is a strong proponent of all efforts to improve the education and training for those licensed to sell fixed annuities in any areas relating to insurance, insurance products, consumer financial needs and planning, taxation and any other matters impacting their function as sellers and servicers of insurance products. This may include financial professional designations earned through testing, professional continuing education or producer continuing education. Core principles of designation use are as follows:

    • A designation used in advertising should be current and verifiable.
    • A designation should represent some significant achievement of knowledge that could be relevant to the advertised insurance and will benefit the advertising recipient.
    • A designation should be awarded by a reputable, accredited organization within the insurance and financial industry.

    As a result of this principle, some designations may be eschewed entirely by insurers or regulators either because they are deemed to be insufficient in rigor, scope or applicability to the sale of insurance or are identified as lacking any significant benefit to the advertising recipient. Therefore, they could easily mislead a consumer.

    NAIC Model 278 Overview

    The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) set forth the framework in establishing these guidelines with Model 278. The purpose of this regulation is to set forth standards to protect consumers from misleading and fraudulent marketing practices with respect to the use of senior-specific certifications and professional designations in the solicitation, sale or purchase, or advice made in connection with a life insurance or annuity product.

    It is an unfair and deceptive act or practice for an insurance producer to use a senior-specific certification or professional designation that implies or indicates that said producer has special certification or training in advising or servicing seniors in connection with the solicitation, sale or purchase of a life insurance or annuity product; in the provision of advice regarding the value or advisability of purchasing or selling a life insurance or annuity product, either directly or indirectly through publications or writings; or by issuing or promulgating analyses or reports related to life insurance or annuity products in such a way as to mislead a buyer or prospective buyer.

    Best Practices

    In addition to the items described below, an agent should confer with his state’s department of insurance, the carrier, any applicable broker dealer and specific agency rules to ensure they are meeting all appropriate standards. Recommendations include:

    • Secure appropriate training or credentials to validate your designation.
    • Maintain your right to use and display your approved credential by performing CE tasks or re-certification as required by the issuer.
    • Choose to pursue those designations and credentials that provide a robust curriculum and credentialing process, including examinations.

    Avoid the Following Practices:

    • Do not use acronyms intentionally similar to other accredited designations that further obscure your qualifications.
    • Do not use designations without any meaningful credentialing or testing process that can be earned simply by paying a membership fee.
    • Do not use a designation that you have not earned or maintained (i.e., kept current).
    • Do not use “nonexistent” or “self-conferred” designations.
    • Do not use credentials you have not actually earned through school, training or specific experience.
    • Do not use designations offered by certifying organizations when:
    1. Minimal oversight exists to affirm that the candidate has competently completed the training and certification program
    2. Measures for monitoring and disciplining designees are nonexistent
    3. Lack of or minimal emphasis on ethics
    4. Inadequate overall curriculum

    Remaining Compliant and Transparent

    In communicating with the public, and specifically with seniors, a producer needs to be very careful and very deliberate. Remember:

    • Crucial pieces of information that should be immediately acknowledged if your intent is potentially to sell a fixed annuity product is that you are an insurance agent, that you believe in the product, and a further acknowledgement that like all financial products, there is no single silver bullet to retirement planning.
    • Some designations require more rigorous training than others, and it goes without saying that experience is not uniform. If you are replacing the consumer’s former advisor, make sure to document the reasons that your new client chose you. Holding your designations or experience as superior is not sufficient to encourage the consumer to work with you. Indeed, this kind of approach has resulted in administrative action at many levels.
    • Documenting everything is also very important, and as NAFA has discussed before, keeping these records organized and accessible can help protect producers.
    • Involving the potential heirs in the planning process in some capacity can be extremely beneficial.

    Advertising in General: Case Law Application

    Many cases have been cited publicly as contributing to both NAIC and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) guidance. In most cases, they involve not only the designations themselves, but also the realm of unethical advertising.

    In Massachusetts, a case concerning the use of “Certified Elder Planning Specialist” (CEPS) to conduct what in many instances were called “Senior Financial Survival Workshops” arose. The case ended in a settlement discontinuing the use of CEPS in Massachusetts.

    Also in Massachusetts, the use of “Certified Senior Advisor” (CSA) has resulted in numerous consumer complaints and administrative actions. Two cases in particular drew a great deal of attention, but one involved a producer liquidating the bulk of his client’s securities assets and moving them into fixed indexed annuities. On the surface, this is not necessarily a red-flag matter on its own. Depending on the individual’s needs, liquidity and other intents, simple asset allocation alteration is often appropriate, as with age, risk tolerability typically decreases. Rather, it was the positioning, the marketing and the manner in which the producer implemented the change that caused the consumer to file her complaint. The consumer cited that her decision to leave her current advisor centered on the new advisor’s “accredited” designation and his marketing materials stating his “[training] in many issues, especially senior finances.”

    In Arkansas, there was yet another case involving a producer using the CSA designation in his advertising and marketing materials that implied his unique expertise in working with seniors. The producer’s membership as a CSA had expired at the time of the sale, and he did not use the required disclosure provided by the Society of Certified Senior Advisors and adopted in March of 2007. The individual in this case also used a number of other designations and acronyms that for all intents and purposes referenced established designations that he did not, in fact, hold.

    In Oregon, an agent was fined $9,000 for misleading the public about his expertise and qualifications and failing to report misdemeanor prosecutions. Similar to other cases, the agent’s designation membership had lapsed, the agent claimed to have written an authoritative booklet, and purported to be an owner/operator of an unregistered business.

    Applicability to Registered Investment Advisors (NASAA and SEC)

    Producers who are also Registered Representatives need to pay attention to a host of other governing bodies when deciding upon a senior designation to pursue and use:

    • NASD Rule 2210 (Now FINRA Conduct Rule 2210) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) 472 prohibit firms and registered persons from making false, exaggerated, unwarranted or misleading statements or claims.
    • The North American Securities Administration Association (NASAA) Model Rule on the use of senior-specific certifications and professional designations concerns what the designation implies to the investor, and if it could imply expertise or credentials that may be inaccurate or misleading.
    • Regulatory Notice 11-52 and 07-43 apply to the firm employing the advisor, although being familiar with the recommendations can help ensure that the RIA conducting business on the life/health side stays compliant and above reproach. Notice 11-52 built upon 07-43 by incorporating the results of a survey of 157 firms concerning senior designations.

    Best Practices

    When considering a designation to pursue, take these steps to determine if the designation is appropriate and approved:

    • Check with your insurance carrier’s or Independent Marketing Organization’s (IMO’s) compliance department.
    • Check with your State Department of Insurance if you doubt or are even remotely uncertain about the status of a designation you have been conferred. It’s wise not to use it until you have checked with the appropriate compliance personnel.

    Originally Posted at NAFA on November 2014 by Kim O'Brien.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency