We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Insurers Take Aim At IUL Illustrations

    December 24, 2014 by Arthur D. Postal

    WASHINGTON – A coalition of three large insurance companies is urging the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) to act promptly to adopt a realistic regulation governing the illustrations insurers and agents can use in marketing indexed universal life insurance (IUL).

    The coalition is composed of MetLife, Northwestern Mutual and New York Life.

    In a recent comment letter to the NAIC’s the Life Actuarial (A) Task Force (LATF), the coalition said that aggressive maximum illustrated crediting rates that are widely used in illustrating potential IUL returns must be curbed. The coalition noted a Kansas Department of Insurance survey indicating that most IUL policies in the market are illustrated at crediting rates greater than 7 percent, with the median illustrated crediting rate above 8 percent.

    “We believe that these high illustrated rates are highly unlikely to be achieved, which could lead to widespread consumer disappointment and potentially damage the reputation of the entire life insurance industry,” the coalition letter said.

    “Companies are justifying these aggressive illustrations by pointing to a historical look-back of index returns, based on current non-guaranteed product parameters and options prices.”

    The coalition’s other recommendations included additional uniform consumer disclosure requirements to be included in the revised guidelines. The coalition letter explained that the model regulation the new illustration guidelines will be part of was developed prior to the advent of IUL products. “As such, there are additional IUL disclosures that would be beneficial to consumers beyond what is required by the model regulation,” the letter said.

    The coalition said any guidance to a group that seeks to craft compromise illustration regulation should focus on several issues.

    These issues include curbing aggressive maximum illustrated crediting rates and a concern that the “use of the historical look-back perpetuates the opportunity for gaming.”

    The letter also says that illustration actuaries lack the necessary guidance to certify that IUL illustrations are self-supporting and that there is a need for any illustration guideline regulation to eliminate loan arbitrage. The letter also calls for enhanced consumer disclosures.

    The coalition urged the NAIC task force to have an acceptable illustration guidance rule in effect by July 1 because “the predominant current industry practices result in aggressive IUL illustrations that are likely to lead to consumer disappointment.”

    “We are concerned that IUL writers who benefit from the status quo have little incentive to effectuate meaningful change,” the coalition’s letter states.

    The letter said that this is “evidenced” by a proposal by the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI proposal), “which would only codify the existing practices that we believe lead to aggressive illustrations and unrealistic consumer expectations.”

    At a meeting held Nov. 1 in conjunction with the NAIC fall meeting in Washington, LATF chair Mike Boerner, an actuary with the Texas Insurance Department, set the March 2015 NAIC spring meeting as the deadline for final NAIC adoption of a new guideline, and July 1, 2015, as the guideline effective date.

    That was based on the LATF providing acceptable guidelines from the commissioners by Dec. 18. However, 10 days ago, the conference call to do that was delayed until sometime in January.

    The ACLI illustration proposal, and its pros and cons, were the focus of the November meeting.

    Not only does the coalition oppose the ACLI proposal, but Sheryl J. Moore, president and CEO of Moore Market Intelligence, voiced concern with the part of the ACLI proposal that calls for reliance on historical lookbacks when illustrating indexed life.

    “Reliance on historical lookbacks in this market is problematic for several reasons,” she said. At the same time, she said she had “no problems” with the other components of the ACLI’s proposal, and, “in fact, [I] wholly-support the ACLI’s suggestion of using midpoint illustrations.”

    Moore is critical in principle of the coalition approach.

    She said she “vehemently disagrees with their proposal because it is ridiculous.”

    But she hedged her criticism by saying that, “I believe that their proposal is based on erroneous information that they were provided in conjunction with indexed life hedging and pricing.”

    “Based on this alone, I give the companies the benefit-of-the-doubt that they had good intentions in developing their proposal. They just can’t get it right if their basis for understanding indexed life product pricing is severely flawed.”

     

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on December 23, 2014 by Arthur D. Postal.

    Categories: Sheryl's Articles
    currency