We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Why VA Owners Are Keeping Their Policies

    December 3, 2014 by Linda Koco

    Living benefits riders have been around for a decade now in variable annuities and, more recently, in fixed indexed annuities.

    That invites a natural question: What are policyholders doing with those features?

    A new study on variable annuity (VA) “policyholder behavior” sheds some light on this. It is a light that annuity professionals may find helpful since the patterns revealed in the study can inform conversations with clients and influence recommendations made to clients.

    The money-ness factor

    The researchers found that the “money-ness” of living benefit riders is spurring policyholders to keep (rather than surrender) their annuities. The trend started during the last recession in 2008 and has continued to this day.

    Money-ness refers to the guaranteed value of living benefit riders when compared to the VA’s actual account value, Peter Gourley said. He is vice president at Ruark Consulting, a Simsbury, Conn. actuarial firm that did the study. Ruark has been following VA policyholder behavior at 18 major VA carriers since 2008.

    In general, money-ness goes up when the VA account values decline, he told AnnuityNews. That’s because the values of the guarantees do not fall. Comparatively speaking, they are worth more. And, when considering the rollup provisions and other features that many living benefit riders include, the value of the rider benefits have actually risen since policy issue.

    Bottom line: The new study found that all living benefit riders showed a “dynamic effect.” The dynamic is that policy lapses (surrenders) decline when the value of the rider guarantees rise in comparison to the account value.

    For example, before the last recession, approximately 30 percent of all VAs would lapse during their “shock lapse period.” (This period is the first year following the end of a VA surrender charge period, which might run five to seven years or so. Policy surrenders typically spike at this period because the policyowner now has access to the funds free of early surrender penalties.)

    However, after the 2008 recession hit, VA surrender rates during the shock lapse period fell to around 15 percent, according to Ruark.

    The declining account values at the time made it so that living benefit riders developed proportionately greater value for clients, Gourley said, noting that some riders may have risen to two times account value.

    He suggested that, when policyholders saw that the value of their riders was now higher, more of them decided to hang onto their contracts during the shock lapse period than previously, Gourley said.

    “People became frightened and wanted to hold on to what they had,” he said.

    “Another factor is that those who might have otherwise been interested in exchanging out of an older VA for a new one, had less incentive to do so. That’s because the VA carriers had started de-risking their policies, a process that included offering living benefit riders that were less rich that previous version.”

    That meant that the incentive to move into a richer VA contract was gone. The combined impact was to keep the lapse rate down.

    How advisors help

    Probably, many policyholders did not reach their decision not to lapse on their own, Gourley said. It is likely that their advisors helped them see the value of the riders in view of current conditions. “Otherwise, they may not have even been aware.”

    Ruark studies found that some policyholders did let their policies lapse during that period, even when they were in the money.

    “Some policyholders really needed the money at the time of lapse,” Gourley said. “But others probably no longer had an engaged advisor who could help them make an informed decision.”

    In general, the study’s findings support the interpretation that “an active advisor who regularly engages with a VA client will result in the client being more aware of the value of their riders and other policy features” than advisors who do not engage, he said.

    “If an advisor has left the business or is not involved, it is hard to know what the client will do with an existing VA or how the person will respond to a new advisor who wants to replace the old product with a new one.”

    A surprise in the data

    Since the stock market has been up for the past two years, and has even reached new highs, one might suppose that VA surrender rates during the shock lapse period are now climbing back up. After all, VA account values in many, if not most, contracts have rebounded substantially from their recession lows.

    However, Ruark found that the surrender rates during the shock lapse period have increased only slightly — by about 0.5 percent — from last year. This is nowhere near pre-recession levels.

    Gourley believes that the de-risked policies that came out in the post-recession era may be a key factor in this. VA carriers still have not returned to offering the rich designs of the pre-recession era, he explained, so “today’s policyowners have little reason to move their VA money if their purpose is to get a better guarantee from another contract.”

    This situation may continue for some time. The carriers Ruark has been talking to indicate they have no plans to do so anytime soon.

    Also, although the stock market has been up, the living benefit rider rollups have increased too, so the riders’ comparative value may still be high enough to keep surrenders down.

    Originally Posted at AnnuityNews on December 3, 2014 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency