We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • IUL Illustration Proposal Goes Up For Public Comment

    February 23, 2015 by Arthur D. Postal, arthur.postal@innfeedback.com

    WASHINGTON – A task force in charge of crafting new rules governing indexed universal life insurance (IUL) illustrations agreed to seek public comment on a proposal that would result in crediting rates in the 6-7 percent range and put limits on loan leveraging.

    This represents another step in the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ (NAIC) efforts to adopt comprehensive new rules governing the illustrations to be used in selling IUL. The NAIC’s Life Actuarial (A) Task Force (LATF) agreed to seek public comment on the proposal at a conference call Thursday.

    The proposal is broken into separate sections for the Currently Payable Scale and the Disciplined Current Scale. Specifically, the proposal stipulates that the illustrated scale must be the lesser of the Currently Payable Scale and the Disciplined Current Scale.

    One actuary termed this “a critical component of the proposal as it represents the main control over the maximum illustrated rate.”

    The actuary said that, for the Currently Payable Scale, the proposal uses a look-back approach that generally results in rates in the high 6s (6.83 percent for a 0 percent floor/12 percent cap product).

    For the Disciplined Current Scale, styled by the actuaries as a “guardrail,” the proposal caps the investment return on options at 45 percent.

    On the call, LATF approved several amendments to the version released just a day earlier. One such change closes a potential loophole, according to an interested party.

    Concerns have been raised that the proposal could be interpreted to apply only to policies where “the illustrated credited rate is tied to an external index or indices.” One suggestion was for LATF to delete the word “illustrated” to avoid a company arguing that their illustrated rate is “fixed,” and therefore falling out of the scope.

    In addition to limiting the illustrated crediting rate, the proposal allows for no more than 100 basis points of loan leverage in IUL illustrations.

    The issue of loan arbitrage was discussed at length during the conference. Asked about the issue, one actuary said that, based on the comments, “We believe LATF prefers to eliminate loan arbitrage on all products at some point.”

    However, the actuary concluded from the comments by the LATF members, that the consensus of the regulators was that, “using this actuarial guideline to eliminate loan arbitrage for IUL would expose LATF to criticisms of treating IUL more punitively than other products.”

    For now, “permitting 100 basis points of arbitrage on IUL allows LATF to defer taking action on loan leverage for other products,” the actuary said.

    The proposal meets a key concern of those looking to ensure that IUL illustrations are more in line with the requirements contained in NAIC’s Life Insurance Model Illustration Regulation, according to one actuary.

    However, the likelihood that the proposal will go into effect this year grew cloudier, based on comments at the conference call in which the draft rule was approved for comment.

    That’s because the proposal calls for the rule to be effective Sept. 1. This is two months later than the July 1 deadline the LATF sought to meet when it debated the issue at the NAIC fall meeting in November.

    In addition, comments by the representative of the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) indicated that the ACLI would seek extra time beyond the March 11 closing date set by the LATF for comments. This would give the ACLI time to canvass its members on its views and present them to the LATF.

    Some ACLI members also claimed that they will need time beyond the proposed Sept. 1 deadline to prepare documents, brief its agents — and perhaps even restructure products in order to comply with the new rule and compete in the marketplace. It is not yet known whether the regulators will be sympathetic of those concerns or whether they will devise an alternative approach that results in the new rules taking effect in 2015, according to several industry officials dealing with the issue.

    The three-page proposed rule represents a compromise, a blend of the views of the coalition of insurers led by MetLife as well as those of two groups of IUL writers, one lead by Minnesota Life and the other by Pacific Life. The other members of the coalition include Northwestern Mutual and New York Life. The proposal also includes several provisions from the original ACLI proposal that was submitted to LATF last summer.

    The proposal was approved for comment by all members of the LATF except the actuary representing the New York Department of Financial Services. Its representative, Bill Carmello, said he opposed it because he supports IUL illustration proposals advanced by the coalition of insurers headed by MetLife.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on February 20, 2015 by Arthur D. Postal, arthur.postal@innfeedback.com.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency