We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • FIA Sales Rise In Otherwise Tough 1Q

    May 20, 2015 by Linda Koco, linda.koco@innfeedback.com

    All but two annuity lines saw sales fall in first quarter 2015 over first quarter last year, according to sales estimates from LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute (LIMRA SRI).

    The two product stars were fixed index annuities (FIAs) on sales of $11.6 billion, and structured settlements on sales of $1.4 billion. Sales for these products increased even though total fixed annuity sales of $22 billion dropped by 8 percent compared to first quarter 2014.

    It was a quarter of drops. For instance, total variable annuity sales fell by 5 percent to $32.4 billion from the same year-earlier period. And fixed and variable performance combined produced an industrywide decline of 7 percent to $54.4 billion compared to last year’s first quarter combined sales of $57.7 billion.
    The quarter saw the gap between variable and fixed annuity products narrow a bit more than before. Variable annuity sales now represent 58 percent of total market and fixed annuities, 42 percent. In first quarter last year, the market shares were 59 percent/41 percent respectively, and in 2013, the shares were 68 percent/32 percent.

    Not unexpected

    The down numbers are not unexpected. As Todd Giesing put it, “persistent low interest rates and market volatility in the first quarter had an impact on all product lines.” He is senior business analyst at LIMRA SRI.

    Even FIAs felt the effects. For instance, even though the FIA industry increased sales by 3 percent over last year’s first quarter results of $11.3 billion, that increase is modest compared to the FIA industry’s outsized increase in first quarter last year, when FIA sales surged 43 percent over first quarter 2013, according to LIMRA SRI figures.

    However, the 2015 performance for first quarter FIA sales still stands out. This is for two reasons. One is that the sales grew despite very difficult market conditions for annuities in general. The other is that first quarter 2015 is the eighth consecutive quarter of increased sales for FIAs, according to LIMRA SRI.

    The downside protection/upside potential characteristics of FIAs appear to be continuing to hold sway with consumers.
    Ranked by percentages, structured settlement annuity products made bells ring in first quarter too. Their estimated sales were up 23 percent over first quarter last year, according to LIMRA SRI’s numbers. But the volume was comparatively small — $1.4 billion for the quarter — so this sector’s impact on overall industry results is also comparatively small.

    A review of the LIMRA SRI sales estimates for the top 20 variable and fixed annuity companies provides some insight into how these markets fared.

    Variable sales

    On the variable annuity side of the business, 14 of the top 20 carriers reported sales declines while only four reported increases. Of the remaining two, one remained essentially level with its first quarter sales last year, and one (18th-place Forethought Annuity) was new to the list.

    Even the top-ranked variable annuity seller, Jackson National Life, reported a decline — to $5.4 billion from $6.4 billion in first quarter last year. TIAA-CREF came in second at $3.2 billion, an increase over its first quarter sales last year. AIG Companies came in third with sales of $4.8 billion, a decrease from the same period last year.

    In terms of billions, 10 of the top 20 sellers had production of over $1 billion. That’s down from 11 in that category last year.

    In terms of rankings, 11 of the top 20 variable annuity carriers held the same numeric rankings they held one year ago. By comparison, on a year-over-year basis, nine carriers held their same year-end rankings on the LIMRA SRI top 20 list for all of 2014, as compared to year-end 2013, while 10 others changed rankings.

    That more than half of the top 20 variable annuity carriers have kept their same first quarter positions as one year ago, and that 14 reported sales declines for the quarter, suggest the variable carriers are sitting tight as they weather tough conditions.

    Fixed sales

    On the fixed annuity side of the business, there was a similar pattern, although less pronounced. Ten of the top 20 fixed sellers reported sales declines from first quarter a year ago, while seven reported sales increases.

    The top three fixed annuity sellers — Allianz Life, New York Life, and AIG, in descending order — held their same rankings as in first quarter last year. But two of the top three reported declines from the same year-earlier period. Allianz reported sales of $2.3 billion, a modest decline, and New York Life reported sales of $1.7 billion, also a modest decline. AIG reported sales of $1.5 billion, a modest increase.

    Five of the top 20 fixed annuity carriers reported sales of over $1 billion, compared to just four in first quarter last year. The five included Forethought Annuity, which was new to the fixed annuity top 20 list compared to first quarter last year. Yet this bulking-up of the billion-and-up group was not enough to offset the overall 8 percent decline in the quarter’s fixed annuity sales.

    In terms of rankings, just three of the top 20 fixed annuity carriers held the same numeric rankings they held one year ago. These were the top three sellers. Three others were new to the list compared to one year ago. The remaining 14 changed rankings — possibly reflecting competitiveness coming from the FIA side of the fixed business, which, as noted, continued to increase sales.

    By comparison, at year-end 2014, all but two carriers had shifted their fixed annuity rankings from the year before. In fact, the LIMRA SRI year-end 2014 numbers showed several big year-over-year swings in rankings, with some fixed carriers moving up or down by three, four or more positions compared to 2013. At that time, total fixed sales increased by 13 percent over 2013, much of it due to strong FIA sales.

    But this is the beginning of another year, and market conditions clearly have changed.

    InsuranceNewsNet Editor-at-Large Linda Koco, MBA, specializes in life insurance, annuities and income planning. Linda can be reached at linda.koco@innfeedback.com.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on May 20, 2015 by Linda Koco, linda.koco@innfeedback.com.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency