We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • IUL: Accumulation vs. Protection

    May 19, 2015 by Cyril Tuohy, cyril.tuohy@innfeedback.com

    One of the strategies discussed in the Insider’s Guide to Indexed Universal Life in the March edition of InsuranceNewsNet Magazine sparked some heated discussion from readers.

    The difference in opinion formed over discussing the death benefit with clients. Josh Mellberg, president of J.D. Mellberg Financial in Tucson, advised that in certain instances or for certain clients, IUL is sold for accumulation rather than the death benefit and to bring it up only muddies the process. The article acknowledged that might be a radical approach and, in fact, some readers responded that it was unacceptable to omit the death benefit from the discussion.

    The schism comes in part because IUL is a relatively new product type that is often sold differently than the typical life insurance policy.

    In 2014, according to Sheryl J. Moore, president and CEO of Moore Market Intelligence, 75 percent of index life sales were into products priced primarily for cash accumulation purposes: education funding, supplemental retirement, premium financing, and other sales scenarios.

    That number dipped slightly from 80 percent in 2012.

    By contrast, last year only 13 percent of IUL sales were oriented toward the death benefit, but that was up from less than 1 percent in 2012. So, death benefit-oriented IUL products are on the upswing. The question is why.

    “Carriers are developing death benefit-oriented IUL products because they can’t keep up with what they call the ‘arms race’ that is taking place with illustrated rates on cash accumulation products,” Moore said.

    It is a race exemplified by rosy illustration scenarios, some of which skirt fantasy; and it is a race that has raised questions among state and federal regulators. New rules regarding IUL illustration scenarios could come as early as September, according to a recent agreement by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners Life Actuaries Task Force.

    In many ways, the pricing models designed to favor accumulation features or the death benefit represent the battle between whether an IUL should be structured as an asset accumulation vehicle used in supplemental planning, or as a protection vehicle focused on the death benefit to provide support to families who suffered the loss of a primary breadwinner.

    In every case, though, advisors said the death benefit should factor prominently in any sale of an IUL, for why buy life insurance if not for the death benefit?

    “You’re selling a product to somebody, tell them what it is,” said agent Michael A. Masiello, principal of Masiello Retirement Solutions in Rochester, New York, in an interview with InsuranceNewsNet. “I think it’s irresponsible to put a client in an insurance product and not have them infinitely aware that it is an insurance product.”

    Advisors have an obligation — ethical at the very least if not legal — to make sure clients are aware of the death benefit when selling a life insurance contract no matter how advantageous or valuable the other features within the IUL are.

    Gabe Myers, CEO of the IUL marketing agency Peak Pro Financial in Greenwood Village, Colo., said that the death benefit is a big part of the sale. In the case of people who die before withdrawing the income, the death benefit will return more to heirs than the initial premium.

    “People who go around the death benefit get into trouble,” he said.

    “If someone’s out there trying to make cash value or growth the lead factor, that’s irresponsible,” said Gilbert Armour, a San Diego-based financial planner with SagePoint Financial. “But if approached as, ‘Here’s an individual situation where it makes sense and what we can do to make it more attractive,’ it can be a worthwhile avenue to pursue.”

    Armour said the purpose of insurance is because somebody has dependents who would be affected by a caregiver dying too soon. To ignore the death benefit is “irresponsible because it is the primary feature of life insurance.”

    Besides, he thinks there are plenty of other investment products in the marketplace that cost less than IULs or other forms of permanent life insurance. True enough.

    But Mellberg of J.D. Mellberg Financial says that while there’s value in the death benefit, the death benefit comes at a cost and that cost needs to be weighed against the other features available in an IUL.

    “The idea is that the death benefit is a great benefit but what we want to promote is to avoid structuring IULs with more death benefit then what meets the client’s protection and estate liquidity needs, because doing so results in the lowest cost of insurance and the greatest growth of cash value,” Mellberg said.

    Mellberg said he tries to focus on the cash value accumulation and keeping the cost of insurance low.

    “If we focus only on the death benefit, then many people won’t even give us an opportunity to show them the value of the product,” he said. “The death benefit is definitely valuable but it’s also about focusing on efficiently managing the cost of insurance and the resulting benefit of much higher potential for cash value growth.”

    Whatever the strategy of the advisor, IUL sales have been on a hot streak lately.

    Indexed life sales for the fourth quarter 2014 were $498 million, an increase of 24 percent compared to the year-ago period, according to Wink’s Sales & Market Report. Fourth quarter indexed life sales were up nearly 34 percent compared with the previous quarter, Wink reported.

    Separately, LIMRA’s Individual Life Insurance Sales Summary Report shows that IUL premium market share has grown to 52 percent of universal life premium, an increase from only 15 percent of universal life sales in 2009.

    Locked in a ferocious battle for clients and capital against banks and mutual funds, and struggling with low interest rates to boot, insurance carriers are doing all they can to spruce up their products by piling on features and riders.

    Moore said that many distributors are focused on IUL sales where cash comes out of the policy because index life offers advantageous loan features.

    “People are saying I need some cash and I don’t know if I can go to the bank, but you’re telling me my index life has an option for me to access the cash; tell me more about it,” she said. “It’s a unique feature of index life that consumers don’t know about.”

    But the question that Masiello wonders about is whether life insurance carriers and distributors have sometimes gotten too “sexy and complicated” for their own good. “People think they’ve bought a Mercedes when they bought a bicycle,” he said.

    Moore said some agents won’t even sell cash accumulation at all, preferring only to sell term life or no-lapse guarantee universal life.

    For financial planner Brian Kuhn, a planner with PSG in Fulton, Md., IULs fulfill both ends of the needs spectrum.

    Kuhn, who serves the middle market, said one of his clients is executing a no-lapse IUL. The contract states that there’s no guarantee of an existence of cash value; only the death benefit is guaranteed so long as premiums are paid on time.

    Another client, though, is in the midst of applying for a policy that is comparatively small, and in which the money the client put into the policy is more than is necessary so that the cash value can potentially grow based on indexing, he said.

    “They are both insurance products and both clients are made aware that it is insurance, but the goals are on the opposite ends of the spectrum,” Kuhn said.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on May 2015 by Cyril Tuohy, cyril.tuohy@innfeedback.com.

    Categories: Sheryl's Articles
    currency