We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Wall St. watchdog says Labor Department broker rule ‘not the way to go’

    May 27, 2015 by Suzanne Barlyn

    A U.S. Labor Department plan to reduce conflicts with brokers who offer retirement account advice drew criticism from the chief of Wall Street’s self-funded regulator on Wednesday, who said it would shift enforcement from regulators to investors.

    The plan, unveiled in April, aims to ensure that brokers offering retirement account advice do not steer customers into high-fee products that boost brokers’ commissions. Brokers would sign contracts, promising to act in investors’ best interests.

    The remarks by Richard Ketchum, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (FINRA) chairman and chief executive, could help bolster the arguments of the brokerage industry which has been fiercely lobbying against the Labor Department’s rulemaking effort.

    “It is “not the way to go,” said Ketchum in prepared comments at the watchdog’s annual conference.

    The Labor Department’s plan “would leave enforcement entirely to investors who feel they’re wronged,” Ketchum told reporters. Investors who believe their retirement account brokers did not meet the standard would have to file arbitrations or class action lawsuits to enforce the contracts, Ketchum said.

    A Department of Labor spokesman said the agency was collecting feedback.

    “We are in the midst of the public comment period and hope that these and other concrete suggestions of how to improve the proposal will be submitted for the record,” the spokesman said.

    FINRA, Wall Street’s industry-funded watchdog, oversees more than 638,000 brokers.

    The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is the “right agency” to develop a best interest standard, Ketchum said. However, designing such a standard would be “challenging.”

    Industry rules now require Wall Street brokers, who register with FINRA, to recommend investments that are “suitable” for investors, based on factors such as their age or risk tolerance. Investment advisers who register with states and the SEC, however, must act as “fiduciaries,” or in clients’ best interests.

    A Labor Department fiduciary rule that applies to retirement accounts would lead to “bifurcated rules” instead of a uniform policy that covers all types of brokerage accounts for individual investors, said the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association in a statement on Wednesday.

    Ketchum has long believed that a broker fiduciary standard “is the direction we must go,” he said.

    Nonetheless, he was “disappointed” by “recent rhetoric about the broker-dealer industry and its regulation that accompanied the Labor proposal.” He later declined to identify or elaborate the sources of that rhetoric.

    In February, however, the Labor Department plan gained a higher national profile when President Barack Obama announced his support. He said it would protect investors from being steered into costly retirement investments that produced high commissions for brokers but low returns for investors.

    Some investor advocacy groups fired back at Ketchum in statements.

    “It is revealing, but not surprising, that the head of Wall Street’s self-regulator would be against requiring Wall Street’s brokers to act in their clients’ best interest rather than in the brokers’ own economic interests,” said Dennis Kelleher, president and chief executive of Washington-based Better Markets.

    Wall Street conflicts of interest cost investors $17 billion a year, Kelleher said.
    (Reporting by Suzanne Barlyn; Editing by Jeffrey Benkoe, W Simon and Andrew Hay)

    Originally Posted at Reuters on May 27, 2015 by Suzanne Barlyn.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency