We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • NAIC Proposes Rules to Put Restraints on IUL Illustrations

    June 3, 2015 by Susan Rupe

    A truce could come to the battle described in this month’s article “How to Compete and Win the Illustration War”.

    The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is expected to adopt new rules governing the illustrations to be used in selling index universal life (IUL) products. These rules are expected to be phased in beginning Sept. 1. One area that would be affected is the so-called “guardrail” that limits the expected yield that can be illustrated when selling IUL to prospects.
    The NAIC Life Insurance (A) Committee is expected to vote on passing the rules by early summer.  

    After the Sept. 1 phase-in, it is likely that implementation of the new rules will be completed March 1, 2016.

    As Washington Bureau Chief Arthur D. Postal reported on InsuranceNewsNet.com previously, the proposed rules would allow agents to show prospects a document that supported crediting rates in the 6-to-7-percent range, although so-called “guardrails” mandated by the proposal could limit actual likely yields to as low as 4.5 percent. The proposal also puts limits on loan leveraging.
    Provisions detailing information on policy loans and establishing additional standards would go into effect for all new illustrations on policies sold on or after March 1, 2016.

    The IUL illustration changes are the result of several months of debate and compromise among the NAIC, several state insurance departments, the American Council of Life Insurers, and a coalition of life insurance carriers including MetLife, Pacific Life, Allianz and New York Life.

    In its proposed guidelines, the NAIC said it sought to address the lack of uniform guidance in illustrating IUL. For example, the NAIC said that two illustrations that use the same index and crediting method often illustrated different credited rates. The lack of uniformity can be confusing to potential buyers and can cause uncertainty among illustration actuaries.

    In particular, the NAIC proposal provides guidance in determining the maximum crediting rate for the illustrated scale and the earned interest rate for the disciplined current scale. According to a draft of the proposed rules, limits would be placed on the policy loan leverage shown in an illustration. The rules also would require additional consumer information such as side-by-side illustration and additional disclosures that would help consumers understand the product.

    The rule would limit the credited rate for the illustrated scale for each index account, according to the draft guidelines. Under the guidelines, the average annual credited rate for the benchmark index account would be calculated for the 25-year period beginning on Dec. 31 of the calendar year that is 65 years prior to the current year (for example, Dec. 31, 1950, for 2015 illustrations), and for each 25-year period starting on each subsequent trading day afterwards, ending with the 25-year period that ends on Dec. 31 of the prior calendar year.

    The proposal also addresses the caps that are shown with the illustrated scale. If the insurer offers a benchmark index account with the illustrated policy, the illustration actuary would use the current annual cap for that benchmark account. If the insurer does not offer a benchmark index account with the illustrated policy, illustration actuaries would use their judgment to determine a hypothetical, supportable current annual cap for a corresponding index account that meets the definition of a benchmark index account and use that cap.

    For other index accounts using other equity, bond, or commodity indexes or other crediting methods, illustration actuaries would use their judgment to determine the maximum credited rate for the illustrated scale. The parameters of the scale would be required to have “the appropriate relationship to the expected risk and return” of the benchmark index account.

    As for policy loans, the proposed rules state that if the illustration includes a loan, the illustrated rate credited to the loan balance shall not exceed the illustrated loan charge by more than 100 basis points.

    The proposed rules state that the basic policy illustration also shall include a ledger using the alternate scale shown along with the illustrated scale. In addition, the basic policy illustration shall include a table showing the minimum and maximum average annual credited rates.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet Magazine on June 2015 by Susan Rupe.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency