We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • What Your Financial Adviser Should be Doing for You

    August 26, 2015 by Chuck Epstein

    The age of consumerism has passed over the financial services industry. This means average investors who buy mutual funds, insurance policies, annuities and other types of investments work under the assumption that their financial adviser is working in their best interests.
    2015-08-26-1440614033-7573203-financialadvisorservice.jpg
    This is a false assumption.

    As numerous lawsuits and ongoing battles over the role of transparency and honesty in financial sales attest, financial reps serve two masters: their investment firm-employer and themselves. This means that many put their financial interests ahead of their customers.

    And it is this inherent conflict-of-interest that dominates most financial sales today that are made by large investment firms and insurance companies where the sales staff is compensated based on selling higher-priced investments over lower-cost ones, including investments that are ill-suited to their own clients.

    The most recent example of how this conflict-of-interest has become the fabric in much of the financial services industry concerns the recent debate about the fiduciary standard and whether or not it should be adopted by the financial services industry.

    Like most debates that concern reform in the financial services industry, this issue has been going on for close to a decade. At issue is whether financial sales people should put the interests of their clients before their own.

    That sounds simple, but codifying the way financial reps recommend and sell products will fundamentally change the entire financial services industry.

    The industry has become so conflicted with this basic issue over which master to serve (the customer or the investment firm) that we now have salespeople known as brokers, registered investment advisers, wealth managers, financial representatives, financial consultants and wealth consultants.

    While most people consider this a question of semantics, these names carry very different meanings and levels of disclosure.

    In practice, this raises the question of whether a financial salesperson should just sell the investment that gives them the best commission or whether they have to implement their due diligence and actually find the investment which most closely meets such key criteria as the client’s financial goal, risk tolerance, income, net worth, investment understanding and time horizon. These are not easy questions to answer.

    Even worse, the dollar amounts in commissions, fees and other hidden compensation schemes are staggering.

    Take the case of an investor with $100,000 in her 401(k) account. This investment can pay a 1.5% management fee to a financial adviser, plus a 1.4% annual fund expense charge, totaling almost 3% of a portfolio in total expenses annually. Nobel Prize-winning finance professor Burton Malkiel estimated that, over time, fees of just 3% can devour up to 50% of an investor’s returns. The ill-effects of larger fees are even worse.

    Even in plain vanilla mutual funds sales, the U.S Department of Labor (DOL) has identified 17 distinct fees that fund companies charge individual shareholders. And just to show that the average American is very uninformed about their own investments, a survey found that 71% of plan participants either don’t know what they pay in fees or think their 401(k) plan is free. It certainly is not free.

    At the pension fund level, the damage of fees and commissions is even more devastating. In a May 2015 report in the New York Times, an audit of New York city pension accounts found that over the past 10 years, five pension funds paid out over $2 billion in fees to money managers and “have received virtually nothing in return,” according to New York City Comptroller Scott M. Stringer. The audit covered funds with assets of almost $160 billion. The funds involved cover 715,000 city employees, including teachers, police officers and firefighters.

    Whose Money Is It Anyway?

    While the scales of these two examples are obviously very different, what happened at the pension fund level is occurring at the individual investor level.

    The remedy from the individual investor’s perspective (after all, it is their money) is that they have to get accurate information so they can make the best decisions that will get them the best possible net return (net of all fees and expenses) over time.

    This means they need objective advice from their financial adviser. If that advice is tainted by undisclosed relationships, hidden fees and commissions, and other incentives that put their own client’s interest second, the individual investor loses.

    That industry-wide conflicted situation exists today and it has to change. One main reason is that individual investors today assume all financial risk for their own retirement investments. This means every dollar they can retain can compound over their working lives to help them achieve a more financial secure retirement income. If $1 is lost to undisclosed commissions, it means less money for the owner of the retirement account.

    Yet it is this simple tug-of-war between providing plain old honest advice between individual investors and financial professionals that has emerged into a major industry battle. The stakes are huge.

    And all this hinges on a simple question: Whose money is this anyway? The individual investor who earned it or the financial rep who wants to keep a lot of it without disclosing material information about how they are being compensated and why one investment is better than an alternative?

    The answer seems obvious to me, but the financial services industry refuses to come clean with its own customers. No wonder individual investors are skeptical of Wall Street.

     

    Wink’s Note:

    Fixed, Indexed, and Multi-Year Guaranteed Annuities (MYGAs) are fixed insurance products, and therefore regulated by state insurance laws and the insurance commissioners that enforce them.

    •  Insurance agents who want to sell Fixed and Indexed Annuities must obtain a life insurance license in the state where they are practicing;
    • The insurance commissioner oversees the financial regulatory practices of the insurance industry as well as the solvency of the companies selling the products;
    • Insurance companies, salespeople, and annuity purchasers go through their local state insurance department when they have questions or concerns about Fixed, Indexed, or MYG Annuities.

    Originally Posted at Huffington Post on August 26, 2015 by Chuck Epstein.

    Categories: Negative Media
    currency