We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Federal Roundup

    September 16, 2015 by Cliff Andrews

    The summer of 2015 will long be remembered as the “Summer of Fiduciary.” The hot humid air has returned to Washington, D.C., and along with it, a growing heated policy debate around fiduciary standards for qualified plans and IRAs.

    Since April, the retirement financial services sector has been engulfed by a fiduciary tsunami via a proposed rule by the Department of Labor (DOL). Many observers believe that this proposal is a solution in search of a problem, but the President and the DOL contend that consumers are being misled by advisors, resulting in billions of dollars of wealth stripped every year. While well-intended, if finalized in current form, the proposal would have the effect of paralyzing many retirement professionals, leaving assistance mostly for the wealthy.

    The massive proposal consists of a base proposed rule that would amend the fiduciary definitions in Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code regarding the “investment advice” triggers, and it includes new and updated Prohibited Transaction Exemptions (PTEs), which allow for certain compensation and business models, subject to onerous and, in some cases, unworkable conditions. Essentially, as drafted, all retirement professionals, including insurance agents, will be considered fiduciaries. Additionally, the DOL limits a seller’s exception to large plans (100+ employees), and it restricts education materials such that the mere mention of any specific investment products or specific plan or IRA alternatives or the value of any property or securities would be deemed “investment advice,” thus triggering fiduciary obligations.

    Fundamental to the proposal is adherence to a new “best interest standard,” which requires an advisor to “act with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent person would exercise based on the investment objectives, risk tolerance, financial circumstances and needs of the retirement investor, without regard to the financial or other interests of the [fiduciary]… any affiliate, related entity, or other party.” Furthermore, the advisor must provide a “range of products,” which impacts proprietary sales and advisors who are only registered to sell certain products, and the advisor must disclose conflicts of interests, make no misleading statements, and all compensation must be “reasonable.” Thus, while DOL’s intent to craft a “best interest standard” is laudable, substantive changes are needed to prevent significant adverse consequences for middle-class consumers.

    After extensive analysis of the DOL proposals by NAFA’s Fiduciary Working Group, a robust comment letter was submitted on July 21. Among other items, NAFA urged that the investment advice trigger “should require a mutual understanding that the advice is individualized to the consumer and will serve as a primary basis for the investment decision.” Also, NAFA requested that the DOL consider a practical seller’s exception for needs-based insurance sales transactions that are covered by rigorous state suitability requirements and that a functional definition of educational materials is included.

    Lastly, NAFA focused on proposed changes to PTE 84-24, which permits fiduciary advisors providing annuities to receive commissions subject to numerous conditions. In particular, definitions of “best interest” and “reasonable compensation” were a core focus.

    In conjunction with the comment letter, NAFA conducted a high-level meeting with DOL officials prior to the comment period closing. This meeting was productive for educating the DOL about fixed annuities and for explaining key changes to prevent negative unintended consequences. Next, the DOL will hold public hearings the week of August 10, followed by a second public comment period that will close by the middle of September. NAFA, along with many stakeholders, will likely use this second comment period to address any remaining concerns in final comment letters.

    Lastly, while there have been bipartisan calls from a number of House and Senate members for the DOL to re-propose the rule, most D.C. insiders believe a final rule will be published by February 2016. Accordingly, we anticipate more action in Congress. Indeed, there have been several recent hearings, and the drum beat for legislation is picking up. Currently, there is pending appropriations language in the House and Senate to defund implementation of a final rule, and Rep. Wagner (R-MO) has introduced a bill that would prevent the DOL from implementing a fiduciary rule until 60 days after the SEC issues a final fiduciary rule.

    More hearings are anticipated this fall. At this point, NAFA has taken no position on legislation as NAFA is focused on working with the DOL to ensure that the final rule protects access to the annuity marketplace.

    Originally Posted at NAFA Annuity Outlook Magazine on September 26, 2015 by Cliff Andrews.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency