We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Industry Trade Groups Question ‘Horse-Before-Cart’ IAIS New Global Insurance Surcharge

    October 6, 2015 by Frank Klimko, Washington correspondent, BestWeek: frank.klimko@ambest.com

    WASHINGTON – The International Association of Insurance Supervisors proposed a 10% average capital requirement surcharge for the largest globally active insurance companies, including American International Group, Inc., and MetLife Inc., as part of a regulatory effort to prevent another worldwide financial crisis. However, insurance companies and trade groups have questioned the practicality of releasing the standards when the IAIS has delayed the approval of the quantitative capital standards.

    The IAIS released the new Higher Loss Absorbency standards Oct. 5 at a press conference in Basel, Switzerland. The HLA surcharge would be up to 18.75% for large insurers engaged in risky financial practices, but much lower, about 6% for companies selling traditional insurance products.

    “For most lines of business there is little evidence of traditional insurance either generating or amplifying systemic risk within the financial system or in the real economy,” the IAIS said in a report that accompanied the new HLA standards.

    “A benign record in the past does not ensure the absence of a systemic risk potential in the future,” the IAIS said. “The potential for systemic risk in insurance may become relevant where insurers significantly deviate from the traditional insurance business model and particularly where they engage in nontraditional insurance or non-insurance activities.”

    The quantitative standards will apply to large international insurers (about 50) while the HLAs are reserved for the approximately nine companies identified as global systemically important insurers (Best’s News Service, Sept. 3, 2015).

    The HLA is a surcharge that will be placed on top of a calculation based on each company’s basic capital requirement. Both will act as financial cushions in case of some economic calamity. The 10% average surcharge is less than the 12.5% average HLA standard that IAIS had previously considered.

    IAIS officials said the HLAs are not a one-size-fits-all standard. Companies that engage in nontraditional, non-insurance financial activities would be forced to meet the higher capital standards. Nontraditional insurer activities could amplify systemic risk under specific circumstances, such as reacting to a sudden market downturn or the unexpected withdrawal of capacity, officials said.

    The Property Casualty Insurers Association of America was disappointed the IAIS published the HLAs without updating the metrics of what activities could get companies into trouble.

    “We had felt it was appropriate for them to wait until they finished the redefinition process for nontraditional/non-insurance (activities) and the GSII determination process before moving ahead with this,” Steve Broadie PCI’s vice president, financial policy, told Best’s News Service.

    Neil Alldredge, National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies senior vice president of state and policy affairs, agreed. Alldredge was in Basel for the IAIS stakeholders meeting.

    “NAMIC remains concerned about many aspects of the efforts to create a higher loss absorbency for GSIIs and its potential to impact the broader industry,’ Alldredge told Best’s News Service. “The IAIS admits that the HLA will have to be changed once (or even if) an international capital standard is created.”

    “We question this cart before the horse exercise,” Alldredge said. “Furthermore, the HLA is based on many assumptions, including averaging some aspects of the calculation that raise serious concerns. Several organizations, including increasingly the regulators themselves, are questioning if an international capital standard can even be created.”

    The HLAs are to be formally adopted in November, but the IAIS doesn’t plan to implement it until 2019, giving regulators a chance to fine-tune the requirements.

    Globally active MetLife has also been selected by U.S. regulators as a systemically important financial institution, which is the American counterpart of the GSII designation.

    Randy Clerihue, a spokesman for MetLife, told Best News Service the company welcomed the implementation delays that the IAIS and the Financial Stabilty Board had built into the adoption schedule.

    “MetLife is pleased that the FSB and IAIS acknowledge that the HLA needs further revision,” Clerihue said.

    “There must be significantly more research to understand what, if any, systemic risks can be associated with the business of life insurance,” Clerihue said. “Until that work is completed, higher capital requirements will only raise costs for consumers while failing to achieve the goal of reducing risk in the financial system.”

    AIG, also a SIFI, said it will continue to work with regulators.

    “AIG believes in strong regulatory oversight,” said Jon Diat, AIG vice president, external communications/media relations. “AIG works closely with various regulators and believes such oversight strengthens the safety and security of the financial system and people’s confidence in it.”

    Originally Posted at AM Best on October 5, 2015 by Frank Klimko, Washington correspondent, BestWeek: frank.klimko@ambest.com.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency