We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,244)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (422)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (804)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Buffer Annuities: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly

    February 24, 2017 by ThinkAdvisor

    A new type of annuity product that offers a cross between an indexed annuity and a variable annuity has begun gaining attention in the investment world—and not all of this attention has been positive. While the buffer annuity has strongly appealed to investors in a post-recession market who wish to participate in the equity markets while still obtaining downside protection, many of these clients have lodged complaints about the products with FINRA in recent months. (See Middle-Income Retirees Least Likely to Prefer Annuities: EBRI.)

    It is therefore important that advisors gain a complete understanding of these products before recommending them to interested clients—and this means knowing the good, the bad and the ugly of the buffer annuity. (see State Crackdown on Annuities Sharpens Suitability Issues for Advisors).

    Buffer Annuity Defined

    A buffer annuity is essentially an annuity that incorporates traits of both variable and indexed annuities.  Rather than investing clients’ premiums primarily in mutual funds, buffer annuities’ sub-accounts are typically invested in complicated structured products (such as options contracts). Structured products often provide the potential to offer higher returns, but also carry more significant risks than the traditional mutual fund investment because of the types of underlying investments (including emerging markets and REIT index options, which can be inherently more risky).

    An SPDIA can be a valuable retirement income product, but choosing the right SPDIA can’t be done using a one-size-fits-all…

    Buffer annuities, as a result, often do not protect completely against the risk of investment losses—most products only offer a degree of downside protection (i.e., they offer a “buffer” against market losses).  For example, when a buffer annuity offers a 10% buffer against losses, the insurance company offering the product will absorb the first 10% of losses associated with the product. The investor herself experiences the remainder of the loss.

    Although these products are riskier than indexed annuity products (that typically protect against any loss of principal), they can offer higher “caps” than most indexed annuities. A cap, as the name suggests, serves to cap the client’s credited interest at the cap amount (for example, if the market gained 10% and the cap is 6%, 6% will be credited, but if the gain was 1%, the client would receive the 1% credit because it is less than the cap amount). 

    Buffer annuities usually offer caps of around 8% to 9%.

    Because of this, the client is able to more fully participate in market gains, which is appealing to many clients who feel that annuities create opportunity losses when the markets are strong. However, clients looking for income protection during retirement should think twice about the risks involved with buffer annuities. 

    Potential Pitfalls

    Most of the negative attention buffer annuities are receiving involves the product’s complexity. Much of this complexity arises simply because structured products are a much more complicated investment than mutual funds—meaning that clients are less likely to fully understand the risks associated with these products.

    Clients who are looking to accumulate assets as an investment may be drawn to buffer annuities because of the greater potential to participate in market gains, but those looking to secure reliable income during retirement should be wary of this type of investment. Because buffer annuities do not entirely protect against the risk of market losses, it is possible that clients can lose a portion of their principal investment.

    It is therefore important for clients to understand the concept of the buffer—which is different than the “floor” that is a common annuity feature. While the floor provides a limit below which the product earnings are guaranteed not to fall, a buffer only reduces the amount that the client can lose by a set percentage. Serious investment losses can cause the product to lose more than the buffer will protect against.

    Conclusion

    Because the buffer annuity is only a few years old, it is especially important for advisors to become educated in the product to ensure that interested clients are getting a suitable product that they understand fully in order to prevent unpleasant surprises down the road.

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on February 23, 2017 by ThinkAdvisor.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency