We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,244)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (422)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (804)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • OMB Reviewing Request to Delay Fiduciary Rule Deadline

    February 28, 2017 by Frank Klimko,

    WASHINGTON – The U.S. Office of Management and Budget is reviewing an interim rule that would delay the implementation deadline of the new fiduciary mandates set to be imposed by the U.S. Department of Labor beginning on April 10.

    The OMB received a request for the delay on Feb. 9, but has yet to publish the content of any proposed rule. The DOL made the request for a delay in response to memorandum from President Trump to review and possibly rescind the rule (Best’s News Service, Feb. 7, 2017).

    The OMB now is considering how to proceed with a delay rule, attorney Erin M. Sweeney, a member with Miller & Chevalier in Washington, D.C., told Best’s News Service.

    “They won’t rescind the rule with what they are filing now,” Sweeney said. “They will have to go through another process. The only thing they are asking for is a delay at this point.”

    No time-frame has been published for release of the content of the proposed OMB rule. It could come out as early as next week, Sweeney said.

    The initial compliance deadline is in April, with a final deadline of Jan. 1, 2018, and industry groups are hoping that the OMB action will provide for a six-month delay. Because finalized rules, like the fiduciary rule, have a body of evidence and precedent behind them, the new administration must demonstrate the evidence is incorrect before a rule can be rescinded, Sweeney said.

    And, the courts have ruled that agencies have an obligation to enforce finalized rules, she said.

    The DOL will use the delay period to establish a record to rescind the rule, Sweeney said. Gathering enough evidence in that short period of time won’t be easy.

    “It will be a full-on sprint to get a record put together,” she said. “It will be very, very hard. You just have this very complicated rule.”

    The new rule, which changes how retirement advisers conduct business, aims to ensure that any transaction is in the best interest of the client. And, except for special circumstances, it generally moves such transactions away from commission-based compensation.

    “That central argument is that as long as you are compensated by insurers, and are not taking all your commission from a fee, then you inherently don’t have your client’s best interest at heart,” said Joel Wood, senior vice president of government affairs for the Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers. “It all goes back to the big battle over compensation and it is just a big bonanza for the trial bar.”

    “We very strongly support a delay and would be very surprised if they don’t maintain their momentum in getting rid of it,” Wood told Best’s News Service.

    In a related effort to keep up the pressure for a delay, the Americans for Annuity Protection on Feb. 23 launched a ‘repeal and replace’ social media campaign. They asked members to post messages critical of the rule on President Trump’s FaceBook page and Twitter account.

    “Repeal and Replace the DOL rule!” a sample message said. “The rule doesn’t help consumers save! As written it is a complete mess and no amount of tweaking will help.”

    However, the rule continues to have its supporters.

    Kathleen M. McBride, past chairwoman for the Committee for the Fiduciary Standard, said the committee does not endorse a delay.

    “No delay, no obstruction,” McBride told Best’s News Service. “We met with OMB last week. Insurance companies that want a delay are working directly against the interests of American retirement investors.”

    “We oppose any delay and in fact as the courts have stated, there is no reason to delay; delay would not be in the public interest,” McBride said.

    Last week, Judge Daniel D. Crabtree, of the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, granted a summary judgment against the rule in a case brought by Market Synergy, an insurance agency licensed in Kansas. Last year, he refused to issue a preliminary injunction and the latest action makes that decision final (Best’s News Service, Nov. 29, 2016).

    (By Frank Klimko, Washington correspondent, BestWeek: Frank.Klimko@ambest.com)

    Originally Posted at AM Best on February 23, 2017 by Frank Klimko,.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency