We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Industry Representatives: Delay Gives Needed Time to Review DOL Fiduciary Rule

    March 21, 2017 by Frank Klimko

    WASHINGTON – Trade representatives support a 60-day delay of the U.S. Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule deadline that will give the department more time to remake or nullify the new mandates, which critics say will upend the retirement advice industry.

    The rule would postpone the current April 10 deadline until June 9 and is part of the Trump administration’s effort to roll back the fiduciary rule that was initiated by the DOL under President Barack Obama.

    Insured Retirement Institute President and Chief Executive Officer Cathy Weatherford said IRI was in favor of the delay. The IRI was among a number of trade groups that filed unsuccessful litigation to block the rule.

    “The fiduciary rule will make it harder for retirement savers to plan for retirement by depriving them of access to affordable, holistic financial planning and education and a wide range of investment options,” Weatherford said in a comment filed with the agency.

    The fiduciary rule inappropriately expands the definition of fiduciary, Weatherford said.

    “An agent who receives a commission on the sale of a product is paid for effecting the sale, not for any investment advice they may have provided,” Weatherford said. “This is clear from the fact that agents are paid only if they make a sale.”

    The rule imposes a complex regime that will put a tremendous burden on advisers who serve the middle market, said Paul Dougherty, president of the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors.

    “The 60-day proposed delay is absolutely necessary, given the fast-approaching April 10 applicability date,” Dougherty said in a comment letter, “and will provide the department a bare minimum of time to consider and implement its next steps without the disputed rule becoming applicable in the meantime.”

    The DOL recently said it will not enforce sanctions against companies that don’t comply with the new fiduciary rule if the department is not able to finalize the hiatus before the initial compliance date (Best’s News Service, March 13, 2017).

    Richard Foster, senior vice president and senior counsel for regulatory and legal affairs, Financial Services Roundtable, supported the delay. He suggested the DOL adopt an additional six-month delay to give the department more time to review the evidence used to justify the new mandates.

    The DOL under Obama used faulty data that suggested consumers were losing $17 billion due to conflicted investment advice given by advisers not acting in their client’s best interest, Foster said. The findings were extrapolated from a study on mutual fund investments that does not apply to retirement advice, Foster said.

    “The adverse effects, both near term and long term, of the final rule are apparent,” Foster said in a comment to the DOL. “Published reports indicate that several large providers of financial products and services to retirement investors have determined to cease entirely serving such investors as a result of the final rule.”

    Jon Stein, founder and chief executive officer of Betterment LLC, a Securities and Exchange Commission-registered investment adviser, opposed the delay.

    “The fiduciary rule is necessary to ensure that Americans receive investment advice that is in their own interests, instead of conflicted sales pitches for high-fee products,” Stein said in a comment letter. “We believe that any delay would needlessly perpetuate conflicted advice at investors’ expense.”

    The new fiduciary rules, which change how financial intermediaries conduct business, aim to ensure that any transaction is in the best interest of the client. Except for special circumstances, the requirements generally move such transactions away from commissions to a fee-based compensation system.

    The 60-day delay will not be triggered until the rule, which was published in the Federal Register on March 2, becomes final. It can’t become final until after the department has a chance to review the public comments, which were due by March 17.

    (By Frank Klimko, Washington correspondent, BestWeek: Frank.Klimko@ambest.com)

    Originally Posted at AM Best on March 17, 2017 by Frank Klimko.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency