We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Rebutting Ken Fisher

    March 19, 2017 by Stephen Kelley, CSA

    Ken Fisher was on TV last week. I know because I saw him. I saw him up there on the tube, trashing the products I use every day to make my clients safe and ensure they have a secure and happy retirement. It’s not so much his message that I object to (though I surely do) as much as the hypocrisy. See, all the while he was proclaiming “we don’t sell annuities and we never will,” he left out the fact that he is a major investor in one of the top three annuity companies in the world.

    See, Fisher’s objection to annuities isn’t driven by any real belief about whether or not they are suitable for their clients; it’s all about marketing and making money. How do I know that? Because of his very “never will” position. Because surely there must be someone somewhere for whom annuities must be the best choice. Don’t you think? I mean I have hundreds of clients who come into our offices who make that choice, and I am an ant compared to his elephant. So if I can find hundreds of people for whom they are the best choice, don’t you think he could find one? If so, why would he not provide it as the answer?

    Annuities do something nothing else in the market does. They ensure against living too long and running out of money. As it happens, running out of money is the number one fear of retirees and those getting ready to retire. In fact, more people fear running out of money than death. By a two-to-one margin.

    So if running out of money is the number-one fear, and there is a product out there that would deal with that number-one fear head on, that was specifically designed to address that fear, and could do it in a way that saved money, lowered fees, and provided two to three times the income that more “traditional” (more about that in a minute) approaches provide, why wouldn’t someone offer that as a choice?

    Would you like to know what I think? I think it’s all about the money, and not about the client. Let’s look at his primary objection: high surrender fees and long surrender periods. Okay, I get that. These are a long-term commitment, and once committed you are pretty much, well, committed. But what are you committing to? Dependable and predictable lifetime income you cannot outlive? How do you even achieve that without a long-term commitment? I mean that’s the definition of long-term commitment, don’t you think? If you are buying something that is supposed to make you safe and secure for the rest of your life, why would you want to get out of it? It doesn’t make sense! Wouldn’t you want a product that you purchased for lifetime income to last a lifetime? Why would you want to get out of it?

    Another reason people who trash annuities give for doing so is loss of principal. Immediate annuities, which are sold exclusively for cash flow and income, often do require you to give up control of your money. Why? So if you die the insurance company will become even richer than it is? No! It’s how they spread the risk. The job of the annuity is to ensure you have income for life, even after the annuity has run out of money. Doesn’t it make sense that if you live a long life at some point your annuity would run out of money? I mean isn’t that what you hope would happen? If it didn’t, why would you buy it in the first place? After all, the whole point is to provide more income than those “more traditional” approaches do, right? Not only more, but guaranteed and dependable. Predictable. Income you know you can never outlive. If you could do that with a T-bill or a CD, or even the market, you would probably use that, right? The reasons annuities do their job is they provide more income together than an individual could get on their own, and they do that by monetizing life expectancy.

    In a nutshell what that means is those who live long lives are subsidized by those who didn’t. It’s a risk pool, just like fire insurance. Fire insurance works because those whose houses do burn down are helped made whole by those whose houses don’t. That means if you buy fire insurance and your house does not burn down, you don’t get your money back. Your money goes into the risk pool and covers the cost of rebuilding houses that do burn down.

    Annuities are just the same. If you live past the point of depleting your savings, the savings of those who passed early provide you income until you pass. That’s the point of spreading the risk … allowing you to achieve a goal you would not be able to on your own.

    That having been said, it is true that people don’t always want to commit their money permanently, even though the goal is to solve a permanent problem. So, while the goal of having income for life can be best solved by a solution that dies when you do, insurance companies have created actuarial-based solutions that give your heirs whatever is left after you are gone. So, if you don’t spend it all, whatever is left over goes to your beneficiaries.

    These new products are relatively new; in fact they have only been around for about a decade. So, to be clear, it is possible to protect your lifetime income needs without having to give up control of your money. That is a new thing that you might want to look at.

    What is not new is the whole approach taken by annuities. Annuities have been around since Roman times. In fact the name annuity comes from “annua,” the term given to Roman soldiers’ pensions. So they have been around almost forever. It should not be missed that some other things that we rely heavily on for retirement are also annuities. Social Security, for one, is an annuity. So are pensions. And no one ever gets on TV to trash pensions and Social Security (unless, perhaps, they are a member of Congress!).

    So if you are looking for a “traditional” approach to retirement planning, why not look at the original solution? Sometimes things that last a few millennia are actually worth considering.

    Read more: http://www.lowellsun.com/news/ci_30866523/rebutting#ixzz4bypg9qRX

    Originally Posted at LowellSun on March 19, 2017 by Stephen Kelley, CSA.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency